Читать книгу A Guide to the Scientific Career - Группа авторов - Страница 95

1 Abramo, G. , D'angelo, C.A. , and Viel, F. (2013). The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions. Scientometrics 97 (3): 555–570.

2 Acuna, D.E. , Allesina, S. , and Kording, K.P. (2012). Future impact: predicting scientific success. Nature 489: 201–202.

3 Adler, R. , Ewing, J. and Taylor, P. (2008). Citation statistics. Joint IMU/ICIAM/IMS‐Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research. [WWW] Available at: http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf. [12/14/2017]

4 Alonso, S. , Cabrerizo, F.J. , Herrera‐Viedma, E. et al. (2010). hg‐index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h‐ and g‐indices. Scientometrics 82: 391–400.

5 Anderson, T.R. , Hankin, R.K.S. , and Killworth, P.D. (2008). Beyond the Durfee square: enhancing the h‐index to score total publication output. Scientometrics 76: 577–588.

6 Bollen, J. , Van de Sompel, H. , Hagberg, A. et al. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS One 4 (6): e6022.

7 Bornmann, L. , Mutz, R. , and Daniel, H.‐D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h‐index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h‐index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (5): 830–837.

8 Bornmann, L. , Mutz, R. , Hug, S.E. et al. (2011). A multilevel meta‐analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h‐index and 37 different h‐index variants. Journal of Informetrics 5 (3): 346–359.

9 Costas, R. and Bordons, M. (2008). Is g‐index better than h‐index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics 77 (2): 267–288.

10 Costas, R. and Franssen, T. (2018). Reflections around ‘the cautionary use’ of the h-index: response to Teixeira da Silva and Dobránszki. Scientometrics 115 (2): 1125–1130.

11 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) (2014) Triennial review of the research councils (BIS/14/746) [WWW] UK Government. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/triennial-review-of-the-research-councils [Accessed 4/19/2017]

12 Dodson, M.V. (2009). Citation analysis: maintenance of the h‐index and use of e‐index. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 387 (4): 625–626.

13 Egghe, L. (2006a). How to improve the h‐index. The Scientist 20 (3): 14.

14 Egghe, L. (2006b). An improvement of the h‐index: the g‐index. ISSI Newsletter 2 (1): 8–9.

15 Egghe, L. (2006c). Theory and practice of the g‐index. Scientometrics 69 (1): 131–152.

16 Egghe, L. (2007). From h to g: the evolution of citation indices. Research Trends 1 (1): https://www.researchtrends.com/issue1-september-2007/from-h-to-g/.

17 Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. (2008). An h‐index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing & Management 44: 770–780.

18 Falagas, M.E. , Pitsouni, E.I. , Malietzis, G.A. et al. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal 22 (2): 338–342.

19 Franceschet, M. (2010). A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 83 (1): 243–258.

20 Hellenic Quality Assurance And Accreditation Agency (HQAA) (2012). Guidelines for the members of the external evaluation committee (Available at: http://www.hqaa.gr/data1/Guidelines%20for%20External%20Evaluation.pdf)

21 Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102 (46): 16569–16572.

22 Hovden, R. (2013). Bibliometrics for internet media: applying the h‐index to YouTube. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (11): 2326.

23 Jacsó, P. (2008). The plausibility of computing the h‐index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference‐enhanced databases. Online Information Review 32 (2): 266–283.

24 Jin, B.‐H. (2006). H‐index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus 1 (1): 8–9.

25 Jin, B.‐H. , Liang, L. , Rousseau, R. et al. (2007). The R‐ and AR‐ indices: complementing the h‐index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52: 855–863.

26 Kelly, C.D. and Jennions, M.D. (2006). The h‐index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (4): 167–170.

27 Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch‐type index saves time and works equally well as the original h‐index. ISSI Newsletter 2 (3): 4–6.

28 Kosmulski, M. (2007). MAXPROD: a new index for assessment of the scientific output of an individual, and a comparison with the h‐index. International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics 11 (1): 5.

29 Malesios, C.C. and Psarakis, S. (2014). Comparison of the h‐index for different fields of research using bootstrap methodology. Quality & Quantity 48 (1): 521–545.

30 McIntyre, K.M. , Hawkes, I. , Waret‐Szkuta, A. et al. (2011). The h‐index as a quantitative indicator of the relative impact of human diseases. PLoS One 6 (5): e19558.

31 Meho, L.I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World 29 (1): 32–36.

32 Meho, L. and Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h‐index of human–computer interaction researchers: a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (11): 1711–1726.

33 Meho, L.I. and Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (13): 2105–2125.

34 Miller, C.W. (2006). Superiority of the h‐index over the Impact Factor for Physics, arXiv: physics / 0608183.

35 Norris, M. and Oppenheim, C. (2010). The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. Journal of Documentation 66 (5): 681–705.

36 Panaretos, J. and Malesios, C.C. (2009). Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics 81 (3): 635–670.

37 Panaretos, J. and Malesios, C.C. (2012). Influential mathematicians: birth, education and affiliation. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 59 (2): 274–286.

38 Penner, O. , Pan, R.K. , Petersen, A.M. et al. (2013). On the predictability of future impact in science. Scientific Reports 3: 3052.

39 Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h‐index? Scientometrics 84: 153–165.

40 Sanderson, M. (2008). Revisiting h measured on UK LIS academics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (7): 1184–1190.

41 Schreiber, M. (2007). Self‐citation corrections for the Hirsch index. EPL 78: 30002, 1–6.

42 Schreiber, M. (2008a). A modification of the h‐index: the h m ‐index accounts for multi‐authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics 2 (3): 211–216.

43 Schreiber, M. (2008b). An empirical investigation of the g‐index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h‐index, the A‐index, and the R‐index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (9): 1513–1522.

44 Schreiber, M. , Malesios, C.C. , and Psarakis, S. (2011). Categorizing Hirsch index variants. Research Evaluation 20 (5): 397–409.

45 Schreiber, M. , Malesios, C.C. , and Psarakis, S. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h‐type variants and some traditional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Informetrics 6: 347–358.

46 Schubert, A. (2007). Successive h‐indices. Scientometrics 70 (1): 201–205.

47 Silagadze, Z.K. (2010). Citation entropy and research impact estimation. Acta Physica Polonica B 41: 2325–2333.

48 Sypsa, V. and Hatzakis, A. (2009). Assessing the impact of biomedical research in academic institutions of disparate sizes. BMC Medical Research Methodology 9: 33.

49 Tol, R.S.J. (2009). The h‐index and its alternatives: an application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics 80 (2): 317–324.

50 Van Eck, N.L. and Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h‐ and g‐indices. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4): 263–271.

51 Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Testing the validity of the Hirsch‐index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation 17 (2): 157–160.

52 Van Parijs, P. (2009). European higher education under the spell of university rankings. Ethical Perspectives 16 (2): 189–206.

53 Vinkler, P. (2007). Eminence of scientists in the light of the h‐index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 33: 481–491.

54 Vinkler, P. (2009). The π‐index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact. Journal of Information Science 35: 602–612.

55 Waltman, L. and vanEck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h‐index. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology 63 (2): 406–415.

56 Wu, Q. (2010). The w‐index: a measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61: 609–614.

57 Zhang, C.T. (2009). The e‐index, complementing the h‐index for excess citations. PLoS One 4: e5429.

58 Zhang, C.T. (2013). The h‐index, effectively improving the h‐index based on the citation distribution. PLos One 8 (4): e59912.