Читать книгу Innovations in Digital Research Methods - Группа авторов - Страница 58

In this chapter, we have highlighted the wide range of data – both orthodox forms and new data types – that are likely to be used, or considered for use, for social science research in the future. The new data types can track people’s daily lives in a more detailed and biographical way than ever before. The potential is that the data retains the strengths of more established forms of quantitative and qualitative data. The risk is that we are distracted by the scale and immediacy of the new data and may lose sight of the carefully constructed and tested rigour of traditional social science research methods.

Within each of the example policy areas we have explored, we note that similar patterns are emerging in the data sources: surveys, cohort studies, administrative data, commercial data, data deriving from new types of media, and trace data. We also note that different data types are now being combined and linked to address particular research questions. The potential of multiple data approaches presents an opportunity for social science research to tackle previously intractable social research questions and to facilitate a closer link to the policy making process by providing results that are grounded in real-world behaviour and delivered in almost real time.

The data identified across the example research areas cuts across all eight data types: orthodox intentional data, participative intentional data, consequential data, self-published data, social media data, trace data, found data and synthetic data. As such data becomes more accessible and the methods for exploiting the data mature, we would expect that selecting and combining data from different parts of the array will increasingly become a routine part of the research process and will transcend traditional divides such as those between qualitative and quantitative methodologies and primary and secondary research and data.⁷⁹

As we have outlined, social science is moving from the idea of datasets to data streams and data arrays. Social science researchers may increasingly use near real time data systems as a tool and combine what, in the past, might have been seen as very different data types. This does not mean it is the end of theory, as has been debated (Anderson, 2007). Perhaps, more than ever, the testing of theories and hypotheses as a principal of social science research is paramount. Even with inductive techniques such as data mining, theory is still important. Without theory and hypothesis driven research, risks are posed by letting the data lead the research process.

The social and historical evolution of what has been termed the data environment has been, and will continue to be, characterized by a blurring of boundaries between data and subject, between researchers and researched, between research and its impact. In this new challenging context, there is a need to develop a new framework of ethics and good practice for accessing, analysing and archiving such data. This need cuts across society but the social science researchers should be at the forefront of developing and championing this new framework. In the next chapter we examine in more detail the methodological challenges and opportunities of using the new types of data and consider exemplar analyses.