Читать книгу Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation - Группа авторов - Страница 43

Back to image

Dimensions of Form in CAE Practice has three categories:

All three categories have a horizontal line with ratings from 1 to 5 that have vertical partitions numbered at partitions 1, 3, and 5

 Control of technical decision-making has a horizontal numbered line where 1 aligns to stakeholder and 5 to evaluator.

 Diversity among stakeholders selected for participation has a horizontal numbered line where 1 aligns to diverse and 5 to limited.

 Depth of participation has a horizontal numbered line where 1 aligns to consultation and 5 to deep participation.

Back to Figure

The figure shows a three-dimensional cross that has different terms near the six arms. Stakeholder is the head of the cross. On the extreme left is Consultation, in front is Diverse and at the back is Limited. At the bottom lies Evaluator and the right is termed Deep Participation.

The top of the figure has the term Control of technical decision making, toward the bottom left is the term Diversity among stakeholders selected for participation, and to the far right is the term Depth of participation.

Near Diverse is a circle named SBE, Evaluator has a circle nearby called T-PE and Deep Participation has a circle named P-PE close to it.

A legend key at the bottom states:

P-PE is Practical Participatory Evaluation.

T-PE is Transformative Participatory Evaluation.

SBE is Stakeholder-based Evaluation.

Back to Figure

The figure shows an arrow termed “Call for collaborative inquiry” pointing toward a pyramid named “Context”.

This pyramid subdivides into 6 sections: Accountability/Outcome/Impact, Formative/Improvement, Capacity Building, Process Use, Developmental, and Knowledge Exchange.

Leading from this is an arrow with the questions:

 What control should I have over the evaluation process?

 Who should participate?

 How engaged should participants be?

Back to Figure

The figure has a series of interconnected hexagonal shapes that state the principles that guide collaborative approaches to evaluation. These are mentioned below:

 Clarify motivation for collaboration

 Foster meaningful relationships

 Develop a shared understanding of the program

 Promote appropriate participatory processes

 Monitor and respond to the resource availability

 Monitor evaluation progress and quality

 Promote evaluative thinking

 Follow through to realize use

In the center of the hexagonal shapes the title “Principles to Guide Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation” is stated in bold black lettering.