Читать книгу Clinical Pancreatology for Practising Gastroenterologists and Surgeons - Группа авторов - Страница 90

References

Оглавление

1 1 Banks PA, Freeman ML, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(10):2379–2400.

2 2 Clavien PA, Hauser H, Meyer P, Rohner A. Value of contrast‐enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. A prospective study of 202 patients. Am J Surg 1988; 155(3):457–466.

3 3 Balthazar EJ. CT contrast enhancement of the pancreas: patterns of enhancement, pitfalls and clinical implications. Pancreatology 2011; 11(6):585–587.

4 4 Robertson JF, Imrie CW. Acute pancreatitis associated with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Br J Surg 1987; 74(5):395–397.

5 5 Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108(9):1400–1415, 1416.

6 6 Balthazar EJ. Staging of acute pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40(6):1199–1209.

7 7 Saokar A, Rabinowitz CB, Sahani DV. Cross‐sectional imaging in acute pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45(3):44–60, viii.

8 8 Bize PE, Platon A, Becker CD, Poletti PA. Perfusion measurement in acute pancreatitis using dynamic perfusion MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186(1):114–118.

9 9 Hameed AM, Lam VW, Pleass HC. Significant elevations of serum lipase not caused by pancreatitis: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17(2):99–112.

10 10 Simpson WF, Adams DB, Metcalf JS, Anderson MC. Nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors presenting as pancreatitis: report of four cases. Pancreas 1988; 3(2):223–231.

11 11 Chikuie E, Fukuda S, Tazawa H, et al. A solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in a man presenting with acute pancreatitis: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017; 31:114–118.

12 12 Shirai Y, Okamoto T, Kanehira M, et al. Pancreatic follicular lymphoma presenting as acute pancreatitis: report of a case. Int Surg 2015; 100(6):1078–1083.

13 13 Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, et al. Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi‐detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 2002; 224(3):764–768.

14 14 Tasu JP, Rocher L, Amouyal P, et al. Intraluminal duodenal diverticulum: radiological and endoscopic ultrasonography findings of an unusual cause of acute pancreatitis. Eur Radiol 1999; 9(9):1898–1900.

15 15 De Rai P, Castoldi L, Tiberio G. Intraluminal duodenal diverticulum causing acute pancreatitis: CT scan diagnosis and review of the literature. Dig Surg 2000; 17(3):288–292.

16 16 Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 1990; 174(2):331–336.

17 17 Casas JD, Diaz R, Valderas G, et al. Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182(3):569–574.

18 18 Wiesner W, Studler U, Kocher T, et al. Colonic involvement in non‐necrotizing acute pancreatitis: correlation of CT findings with the clinical course of affected patients. Eur Radiol 2003; 13(4):897–902.

19 19 Inoue K, Hirota M, Beppu T, et al. Angiographic features in acute pancreatitis: the severity of abdominal vessel ischemic change reflects the severity of acute pancreatitis. JOP 2003; 4(6):207–213.

20 20 Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology 1999; 211(3):727–735.

21 21 Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(5):1261–1265.

22 22 Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(2):386–392.

23 23 London NJ, Neoptolemos JP, Lavelle J, et al. Contrast‐enhanced abdominal computed tomography scanning and prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1989; 76(3):268–272.

24 24 King NK, Powell JJ, Redhead D, Siriwardena AK. A simplified method for computed tomographic estimation of prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38(4):433–436.

25 25 Ishikawa K, Idoguchi K, Tanaka H, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis based on retroperitoneal extension: application of the concept of interfascial planes. Eur J Radiol 2006; 60(3):445–452.

26 26 De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, et al. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas 2007; 34(2):185–190.

27 27 Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107(4):612–619.

28 28 Balthazar EJ. Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 2002; 223(3):603–613.

29 29 Bakker OJ, van Santvoort H, Besselink MG, et al. Extrapancreatic necrosis without pancreatic parenchymal necrosis: a separate entity in necrotising pancreatitis? Gut 2013; 62(10):1475–1480.

30 30 Sakorafas GH, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG. Extrapancreatic necrotizing pancreatitis with viable pancreas: a previously under‐appreciated entity. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188(6):643–648.

31 31 Wang M, Wei A, Guo Q, et al. Clinical outcomes of combined necrotizing pancreatitis versus extrapancreatic necrosis alone. Pancreatology 2016; 16(1):57–65.

32 32 Bouwense SA, van Brunschot S, van Santvoort HC, et al. Describing peripancreatic collections according to the Revised Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis: an international interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 2017; 46(7):850–857.

33 33 Ageno W, Squizzato A, Togna A, et al. Incidental diagnosis of a deep vein thrombosis in consecutive patients undergoing a computed tomography scan of the abdomen: a retrospective cohort study. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10(1):158–160.

34 34 Butler JR, Eckert GJ, Zyromski NJ, et al. Natural history of pancreatitis‐induced splenic vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of its incidence and rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13(12):839–845.

35 35 Roch AM, Maatman TK, Carr RA, et al. Venous thromboembolism in necrotizing pancreatitis: an underappreciated risk. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23(12):2430–2438.

36 36 Verde F, Fishman EK, Johnson PT. Arterial pseudoaneurysms complicating pancreatitis: literature review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015; 39(1):7–12.

37 37 Occhionorelli S, Morganti L, Cappellari L, et al. Asymptomatic and early pseudoaneurysm of posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery and right gastric artery complicating acute pancreatitis: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 28:344–347.

38 38 Burke JW, Erickson SJ, Kellum CD, et al. Pseudoaneurysms complicating pancreatitis: detection by CT. Radiology 1986; 161(2):447–450.

39 39 Brar R, Singh I, Brar P, et al. Pancreatic choledochal fistula complicating acute pancreatitis. Am J Case Rep 2012; 13:47–50.

40 40 Chen C, Huang Z, Li H, et al. Evaluation of extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of organ failure in acute pancreatitis as defined by the revised Atlanta classification. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(15):e6517.

41 41 Dhall JC, Marwah S, Singh RB, et al. Extra‐hepatic biliary‐ductal necrosis in acute pancreatitis: a rare complication. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16(3):209–210.

42 42 Ho HS, Frey CF. Gastrointestinal and pancreatic complications associated with severe pancreatitis. Arch Surg 1995; 130(8):81–83.

43 43 Alexander ES, Clark RA, Federle MP. Pancreatic gas: indication of pancreatic fistula. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139(6):1089–1093.

44 44 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence‐based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13(4 Suppl 2):e1–e15.

45 45 Dachs RJ, Sullivan L, Shanmugathasan P. Does early ED CT scanning of afebrile patients with first episodes of acute pancreatitis ever change management? Emerg Radiol 2015; 22(3):239–243.

46 46 Jin DX, McNabb‐Baltar JY, Suleiman SL, et al. Early abdominal imaging remains over‐utilized in acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62(10):2894–2899.

47 47 Shinagare AB, Ip IK, Raja AS, et al. Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(2):272–277.

48 48 Sutton PA, Humes DJ, Purcell G, et al. The role of routine assays of serum amylase and lipase for the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009; 91(5):381–384.

49 49 Kamal A, Faghih M, Moran RA, et al. Persistent SIRS and acute fluid collections are associated with increased CT scanning in acute interstitial pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53(1):88–93.

50 50 Kothari S, Kalinowski M, Kobeszko M, Almouradi T. Computed tomography scan imaging in diagnosing acute uncomplicated pancreatitis: usefulness vs cost. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(9):1080–1087.

51 51 Spanier BW, Nio Y, van der Hulst RW, et al. Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study. Pancreatology 2010; 10(2–3):222–228.

52 52 Reynolds PT, Brady EK, Chawla S. The utility of early cross‐sectional imaging to evaluate suspected acute mild pancreatitis. Ann Gastroenterol 2018; 31(5):628–632.

53 53 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis – 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62(1):102–111.

54 54 Morcos SK, Thomsen HS. Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 2001; 11(7):1267–1275.

55 55 Nicola R, Shaqdan KW, Aran K, et al. Contrast‐induced nephropathy: identifying the risks, choosing the right agent, and reviewing effective prevention and management methods. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2015; 44(6):501–504.

56 56 Moore A, Dickerson E, Dillman JR, et al. Incidence of nonconfounded post‐computed tomography acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients with stable renal function receiving intravenous iodinated contrast material. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2014; 43(5):237–241.

57 57 De Simone B, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, et al. Is the risk of contrast‐induced nephropathy a real contraindication to perform intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomography for non‐traumatic acute abdomen in emergency surgery department? Acta Biomed 2018; 89(9‐S):158–172.

58 58 Schauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Medical exposure: are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 2009; 97(1):1–5.

59 59 Morgan DE, Ragheb CM, Lockhart ME, et al. Acute pancreatitis: computed tomography utilization and radiation exposure are related to severity but not patient age. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8(3):303–308; quiz e33.

60 60 Ball CG, Correa‐Gallego C, Howard TJ, et al. Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: how much is too much? J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14(10):1529–1535.

61 61 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(22):2277–2284.

Clinical Pancreatology for Practising Gastroenterologists and Surgeons

Подняться наверх