Читать книгу Graves' Orbitopathy - Группа авторов - Страница 36

How Is Severity Best Classified?

Оглавление

As discussed in the section “What Value Does the Mnemonic ‘NOSPECS’ Have?”, the NOSPECS classification is unsuitable for the management of GO. Instead, EUGOGO has proposed a classification of severity of relevance to patient management [67]. It is based on the impact of GO on the patient’s quality of life and the risk of visual loss. Three categories of severity are recognized: mild, moderate-to-severe, or sight-threatening as follows:

1.Mild: characteristics of GO have minimal impact on the patient’s life. They usually present one or more of the following signs:

(a)minor lid retraction (<2 mm);

(b)mild soft-tissue involvement;

(c)exophthalmos <3 mm (above the normal range for the race and gender);

(d)transient or no diplopia;

(e)corneal exposure responsive to lubricants

2.Moderate to severe: patients without sight-threatening GO whose eye disease has sufficient impact on daily life to justify the risks of immunosuppression (if active) or surgical intervention (if inactive); patients usually present one or more of the following signs:

(a)lid retraction (>2 mm);

(b)moderate or severe soft-tissue involvement;

(c)exophthalmos ≥3 mm (above the normal range for the race and gender);

(d)inconstant or constant diplopia

3.Sight-threatening GO: patients with DON or corneal breakdown due to severe exposure; other infrequent cases are ocular globe subluxation, severe forms of frozen eye, choroidal folds, and postural visual darkening; this category warrants immediate intervention

As a rule of thumb, it is considered that all patients who do not have a mild or a sight-threatening ophthalmopathy present with moderate-to-severe disease [68].

Graves' Orbitopathy

Подняться наверх