Читать книгу Pediatric Epidemiology - Группа авторов - Страница 16
References
Оглавление1Spriggs M, Caldwell PH: The ethics of paediatric research. J Paediatr Child Health 2011;47:664–667.
2Leikin S: Ethical Issues in Epidemiologic Research with Children; in Coughlin SS, Beauchamps TL (eds): Ethics and Epidemiology. New York, Oxford, 1996, pp 199–218.
3Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies. Geneva, 2009.
4Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bräunlich A, Zeeb H, Razum O: Theorie und Praxis der Epidemiologie. Teil I: Systematik theroetischer Grundlagen der Epidemiologie als zentrale Fachdisziplin von “Public Health.” Prävention und Gesundheitsforschung 2006;3:190–197.
5Gross D: Zwischen Gesundheitsforschung und Gesundheitserziehung. Der Rollenkonflikt des Epidemiologen und seine ethischen Implikationen; in Gross D (ed): Zwischen Theorie und Praxis 2: Ethik in der Medizin in der Lehre, Klinik und Forschung. Würzburg, Könighausen & Neumann, 2002, pp 277–300.
6Weed DL, Mink PJ: Roles and responsibilities of epidemiologists. Ann Epidemiol 2002;12:67–72.
7Buchanan A, Daniels N, Brock D, Wikler D: From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
8Schröder P: Public-Health-Ethik in Abgrenzung zur Medizinethik. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 2007;50:103–111.
9Wagner S: Ein unterdrücktes und verdrängtes Kapitel der Heimgeschichte. Arzneimittelstudien an Heimkindern. Sozial Geschichte Online 2016;19:61–113.
10Gesetz zur Neuordnung des Arzneimittelrechts. http://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl176110.pdf. vol 24, August 1976.
11Schmidt-Langels D, Langels O: Das lange Leiden nach dem Kinderheim. SPON 2/2/2016:http://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/diagnose/medikamententests-in-deutschland-das-lange-leiden-nach-dem-kinderheim-a-1075196.html.
12Beauchamp TL: In the Shadow of Nuremberg: Unlearned Lessons from the Medical Trial; in Rubenfeld S, Bendict S (eds): Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust. Cham, Heidelberg, Springer, 2014, pp 175–193.
13Brody H: The Origins and Impact of the Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial; in Rubenfeld S, Bendict S (eds): Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust. Cham, Heidelberg, Springer, 2014, pp 163–173.
14Elkeles B: The German Debate on Human Experimentation between 1880 and 1914; in Roelcke V, Maio G (eds): Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subject Research. Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2004, pp 19–33.
15Bonah C, Menut P: BCG Vaccination around 1930 – Dangerous Experiment or Established Prevention? Practices and Debates in France and Germany; in Roelcke V, Maio G (eds): Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subject Research. Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2004, pp 111–127.
16Nadav D: The “Death Dance of Lübeck”: Julius Moses and the German Guidelines for Human Experimentation, 1930; in Roelcke V, Maio G (eds): Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subject Research. Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2004, pp 129–135.
17Roelcke V: The use and abuse of medical research ethics. The German Richtlinien/guidelines for human subject research as an instrument for the protection of research subjects – and of medical science, ca. 1931–61/64; in Weindling P (ed): From Clinic to Concentration Camp. Reassessing Nazi Medical and Racial Research, 1933–1945. London/New York, Routledge, 2017, pp 33–56.
18Hinz-Wessels A: Das Robert Koch-Institut im Nationalsozialismus. Berlin, Kadmos, 2008.
19Bruns F: Medical Ethics and Medical Research on Human Beings in National Socialism; in Rubenfeld S, Bendict S (eds): Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust. Cham, Heidelberg, Springer, 2014, pp 39–50.
20Roelcke V: Sulfonamide Experiments on Prisoners in Nazi Concentration Camps: Coherent Scientific Rationality Combined with Complete Disregard of Humanity; in Rubenfeld S, Bendict S (eds): Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust. Cham, Heidelberg, Springer, 2014, pp 51–66.
21Weindling P: “No Mere Murder Trial”: The Discourse on Human Experiments at the Nuremberg Medical Trial; in Roelcke V, Maio G (eds): Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subject Research. Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2004, pp 167–180.
22Schmidt U: The Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial and the Nuremberg Code; in Schmidt U, Frewer A (eds): History and Theory of Human Experimentation. The Declaration of Helsinki and Modern Medical Ethics. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2007, pp 71–116.
23Weindling P: From Clinic to Concentration Camp. Reassessing Nazi Medical and Racial Research, 1933–1945. London/New York, Routledge, 2017.
24Rotzoll M, Hohendorf G: Murdering the Sick in the name of Progress? The Heidelberg Psychiatrist Carl Schneider as a brain Researcher and “Therapeutic Idealist”; in Weindling P (ed): From Clinic to Concentration Camp. Reassessing Nazi Medical and Racial Research, 1933–1945. London/New York, Routledge, 2017, pp 163–182.
25Roelcke V: Human Subjects Research during National Socialist Era, 1933–1945; in Roelcke V, Maio G (eds): Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subject Research. Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2004, pp 151–166.
26Hohendorf G, Rotzoll M: Medical Research and National Socialist Euthanasia: Carl Schneider and the Heidelberg Research Children from 1942 until 1945; in Rubenfeld S, Bendict S (eds): Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust. Cham, Heidelberg, Springer, 2014, pp 127–138.
27Roelcke V: Psychiatrische Wissenschaft im Kontext nationalsozialistischer Politik und “Euthanasie.” Zur Rolle von Ernst Rüdin und der Deutschen Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie/Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut; in Kaufmann D (ed): Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus. Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven der Forschung, Vol. 1/1. Göttingen, Wallstein, 2000, pp 114–148.
28Lederer SE: Research without borders: The origins of The Declaration of Helsinki, in Roelcke V, Maio G (eds): Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subject Research. Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations. Stuttgart, Steiner, 2004, pp 199–217.
29Susser M, Stein Z, Kline J: Ethics in epidemiology. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 1978;437:128–141.
30Sass HM: [Ethics in epidemiology]. Gesundheitswesen 1993;55:119–126.
31Weed DL, Coughlin SS: New ethics guidelines for epidemiology: background and rationale. Ann Epidemiol 1999;9:277–280.
32Deutsche Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie (DGEpi): Leitlinien und Empfehlungen zur Sicherung von Guter Epidemiologischer Praxis (GEP). https://dgepi.de/fileadmin/pdf/leitlinien/GEP_mit_Ergaenzung_GPS_Stand_24.02.2009.pdf. July 2008.
33Inter alia: Spiegel Online 2/2/2016, “...in Frontal 21 sprechen sie erstmals über ihr Schicksal: Kinder als Versuchskaninchen;” Hamburger Abendblatt 24/9/2016, “Wurden Medikamente an Bremer Heimkindern getestet?;” NDR Schleswig-Holstein Magazin 11/10/2016, “Medikamentenversuche: Opfer wollen Aufklärung;” ARD/MDR Fakt exklusiv 18/19/2016, Medikamentenversuche an Kindern in westdeutschem Heim; WDR 19/10/2016, “Medikamententests auch an Essener Heimkindern;” Bild online 19/19/2016, “Medizin-Skandal enthüllt: Heimkinder für Medikamenten-Tests missbraucht;” WDR 20/10/2016, “Bethel räumt Medikamenten-Versuche ein;” Westfalenblatt 03/11/2016, “Medikamentenversuche an Heimkindern: Studie zur Aufklärung im Gesundheitsausschuss des Landtags angekündigt;” Giessener Nachrichten 16/12/2016, ”Giessener Klinik bis in 70er in Kinderversuche verstrickt?”.
Prof. Dr. Maike Rotzoll
Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Im Neuenheimer Feld 327, Raum 107a
DE–69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
