Читать книгу Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine - Группа авторов - Страница 485

Epidemiology of faecal incontinence Prevalence

Оглавление

Faecal incontinence is under‐reported by sufferers, and as such, it is challenging to collect accurate prevalence data. In a US representative sample of 2229 women and 2079 men, Whitehead and colleges reported a prevalence of faecal incontinence (defined as any involuntary loss of mucous, liquid, or solid stool in the preceding month) of 15.3% in the over‐75 age group.24 In New Zealand, Sharma et al. surveyed 2000 adults by post, with an average age of 51.6: 14.7% of participants ‘felt they had a problem with bowel control’, and 12.4% had faecal incontinence when defined using the Faecal Incontinence Severity Index table as ‘leakage of liquid or solid stool ≥ 1/month’.25 A systematic review in 2016 synthesized 30 trials, reporting a prevalence of monthly FI of 8.3–8.4% in face‐to‐face or telephone interviews and 11.2–12.4% for postal surveys. Age‐stratified data were not reported.26 The prevalence among those living in long‐term care is unsurprisingly higher, with a recent systematic review reporting rates between 10 and 70% using a wide variety of data‐collection tools and case definitions. The median prevalence in all studies was 42%.27 In younger people, the prevalence of faecal incontinence is higher in women, largely driven by obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS), but this differential disappears in older age.28 Faecal and urinary incontinence frequently co‐exist, and those presenting with urinary incontinence should be asked specifically about bowel control and faecal incontinence.

Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine

Подняться наверх