Читать книгу Animal Behavior for Shelter Veterinarians and Staff - Группа авторов - Страница 175

Safety net programs come in a variety of formats, but all have the same goal of facilitating pet retention. Their impact is the direct effect or outcome of the program—that is, increased pet retention. Benefits, on the other hand, are broader, positive effects that contribute to an improvement in the pet‐owning environment. A safety net program’s impact on the goal of reducing pet relinquishment should be a measurable effect, while a program’s benefits may extend beyond the immediate goal of keeping pets in homes to broader positive changes for the pet, owner, sheltering organization, and community.

Pets derive direct benefits from safety net programs through accessible resources necessary for their welfare, such as basic needs, veterinary care, and behavioral support. Provisioning these resources and services directly improves an animal’s health and welfare while reducing the risk of relinquishment. Keeping animals out of shelters through programs that support pet ownership also eliminates the stress of transition and inherent stressors of a shelter environment on the animal.

Pet owners also benefit from safety net programs. Programs that support pet ownership facilitate pet retention, decrease the stress related to an inability to meet the needs of the pet, and eliminate the need for a difficult relinquishment decision. Continued pet ownership may also allow owners to enjoy the benefits of improved physical and mental health (McCune et al. 2014; Wells 2019). In addition, safety net programs provide support services that can enhance the owner‐pet relationship. Informational resources can improve an owner’s understanding of the pet’s needs and enable an owner to better meet those needs (Kidd et al. 1992; New et al., 2000; Patronek et al. 1996a; Patronek et al. 1996b). Knowing more about species‐specific behavior may normalize the pet’s behavior, which can reduce an owner’s frustration.

Safety net programs also yield beneficial effects for the sheltering organization and the community at large. One obvious effect of reducing pet relinquishments is the potential to reduce shelter intakes. A reduction in shelter animal population better enables an organization to function within its capacity for care, improving the well‐being of animals and personnel within the shelter, and potentially allowing care for animals that require more resources. In addition, reduced intakes may allow an organization to scale up or down or to shift focus, including expanding their community programs to support pet ownership. Such expansion may include strategic community partnerships that allow the organization to provide more comprehensive support through coordinated and targeted services. Greater engagement with the community improves knowledge of its pet ownership needs and challenges, facilitating more tailored programs and increasing their impact. Additionally, increased engagement with the community provides the organization multiple touchpoints, engendering positive perceptions and cementing the idea that an animal sheltering organization is a supportive resource for all pet owners.