Читать книгу Russian business law: the essentials - - Страница 14

In comparison with federal constitutional laws, the federal laws have a simpler adoption procedure and less legal force. Therefore, federal laws cannot contradict the federal constitutional laws. In case of a contradiction, the federal constitutional law shall be applied. This rule is not fixed in any normative legal act, but it is generally accepted.

4.2.1. The Laws of the Russian Federation

The modern system of sources of law started to form in Russia after the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993. Such terms like "the federal constitutional law" and "the federal law" were first set in the Constitution. At the same time, in the history of Russia there was a period of two years (from the end of 1991 till the end of 1993) when the Soviet Union had already collapsed, and the new constitution was not yet adopted. The laws being adopted at that time were called as laws of the Russian Federation (laws of the RF), and were not called federal laws.[19] Some of those continue to operate until today (for example, Law on Mass Media, Law on Consumer Rights Protection, and the Competition Law). The laws of the RF are of the same legal force as federal laws.

4.2.2. Codes

In Russia, the code is a form of a federal law, therefore in case of an absence of special instructions, it has the same legal force as federal laws. However, such instructions are contained in the majority of codes. For instance, paragraph 2 of Clause 2 of Article 3 of Civil Code of the Russian Federation (hereafter CC of the RF) stipulates that the norms of civil law, which are contained in other laws, have to correspond with the CC of the RF. This rule finds confirmation thereof in the judicial practice.

An agreement was concluded by and between an organization (subscriber) and a telecommunication operator, according to which the telecommunication operator provided to the subscriber access to a telephone network. Despite the fact that the agreement was made for an indefinite term, the telecommunication operator refused to prolong its action for the recurrent year. Due to the disconnection from telecommunications, the subscriber addressed the court. The subscriber referred to the following: according to the CC of the RF the agreement of the provision of communication services is public, and therefore the operator could not have terminated it unilaterally. The telecommunication operator claimed that according to the federal law N 126-FZ dated July 7, 2003 "On Communication," such an agreement is public, provided that it has been concluded with a citizen.

The Supreme Court of Arbitration of the Russian Federation considered the case as a supervisory instance. In the Decision of the Supreme Court of Arbitration No. 9548/09, dated October 5, 2009, it was specified that by virtue of paragraph 2 of Clause 2 of Article 3 of the CC of the RF norms of civil law, as is contained in other laws, shall correspond with the CC of the RF. In this regard the provisions of the Federal Law N 126-FZ dated July 7, 2003, "On Communication," which stipulates that the agreement for provision of communication services, concluded with a citizen, is public, and cannot be interpreted as a limiting norm of CC of the RF. Therefore, any agreement of the provision of communication services is public.

At the same time, courts do not always adhere to the rule about the supremacy of norms of the CC of the RF, over the civil norms that are contained in other sources. Thus, courts apply the norms of Articles 6–11 of FL on Transportation-Forwarding Activities, which contradict Article 803 of the CC of the RF. These articles state norms on the responsibility of the forwarding agent under the transportation-forwarding contract. Article 803 of the CC of the RF states that the basis and the extent of responsibility are defined explicitly by the norms of chapter 25 of the CC of the RF. In contradiction to this rule, clause 1 of Article 6 of FL on Transportation-Forwarding Activities, states that the basis and the extent of the responsibility of the forwarding agent are defined not only by the CC of the RF, but also by the FL on Transportation-Forwarding Activities. Furthermore, Clauses 3–5 of Article 6 and Articles 7–11 of the aforementioned law, set a different, more difficult order for bringing the forwarding agent to responsibility, than is provided by the CC of the RF.

The necessity for the application of the mentioned articles of FL on Transportation-Forwarding Activities is also confirmed by the supreme courts (see, for example, the Information Letter No. C5–7/UZ-886 dated March 5, 2003 of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF "About the Federal Law On Transportation-Forwarding Activities).

The core codes for conducting entrepreneurship in Russia are:

i) The Civil Code of the Russian Federation

The CC of the RF consists of four parts,[20] each of which is considered as a separate federal law. However, these four laws make a uniform code. Under the term “the civil code,” all four parts thereof are regarded. The numbering of all articles of the code is continuous.

The CC of the RF is the basis of the civil legislation which “defines the legal status of the participants of the civil turnover, the grounds of emergence, and the procedure of the implementation of property rights and other real rights, rights for the results of intellectual activity, and means of individualization (of intellectual rights) equated to them, regulates the relations connected with the participation of corporate organizations or with their management (the corporate relations), contractual and other obligations, and also other property and personal non-property relations based on equality, an autonomy of will, and property independence of participants,” (clause 1 of Article 2 of the Civil Code of the RF).

ii) The Civil Procedure Code of the RF

The Civil Procedure Code of the RF regulates the procedure of civil legal proceedings in the courts of general jurisdiction.

iii) The Arbitration Procedural Code of the RF

The Arbitration Procedural Code of the RF regulates the legal proceedings form in the arbitration courts. The arbitration courts in the Russian Federation administer jurisdiction in the sphere of entrepreneurial and other economic activity (Article of 1 Arbitration Procedural Code of the RF).

iv) The Tax Code of the RF

The Tax Code of the RF, as well as the CC of the RF, consists of several parts which represent separate federal laws, but collectively form a uniform code. However, unlike the CC of the RF, there are two parts (not four parts) in the Tax Code of the RF.

The Tax Code of the RF stipulates the basis of the legislation on taxes and levies which regulates "relations of power with respect to the establishment, introduction, and collection of taxes and levies in the Russian Federation, as well as the relations which arise in the process of exercising tax control, and appealing against acts of tax authorities and the actions (and inaction) of their officials, and imposing sanctions for the tax offences," (Article 2 of the Tax Code of the RF).

Other federal laws on taxes and levies have to correspond with the Tax Code of the RF (Clause 1 of Article 1 of the Tax Code of the RF).

v) The Land Code of the RF

The Land Code of the RF regulates the relations on the use and protection of lands in the Russian Federation.

The norm of the land law, as contained in other federal laws, in laws of the subjects of the Russian Federation have to correspond with the Land Code of the RF (paragraph 2, Clause 1 of Article 2 of the Land Code of the RF).

vi) The Labor Code of the RF

The Labor Code of the RF is the basic law regulating the relations between the employee and the employer, as well as between the employer and the state.

The norms of the labor law, as contained in other federal laws, have to correspond with the Labor Code of the RF (Part 3 of Article 5 of the Labor Code of the RF).

vii) The Criminal Code of the RF

The Criminal Code of the RF provides for criminal liability for serious offenses/crimes. The criminal liability for different deeds can be established only by the Criminal Code of the RF.

viii) The Criminal Procedure Code of the RF

The Criminal Procedure Code of the RF regulates the procedure for criminal legal proceedings in the courts.

ix) The Code of Administrative Offences of the RF

The Code of Administrative Offences of the RF provides for administrative responsibility for the deeds listed therein, and lists the bodies which are authorized to consider cases of administrative offenses. It also regulates the proceedings, as well as the execution of decisions on cases of administrative offenses.

Unlike the Criminal Code of the RF, the Code of Administrative Offences of the RF does not contain an exhaustive list of deeds which result in administrative responsibility. The structures of administrative offenses and sanctions thereof are fixed in other legal acts as well. Thus, part 1 of Article 34 of the FL on Protection of Competition provides for the possibility of compulsory liquidation of the organization, in case it was created without receiving a prior consent of antimonopoly authority, provided that the necessity of receiving such consent is defined by the law. Additionally, the administrative responsibility can be established by the laws of the subjects of the Russian Federation.

4.2.3. The Federal Laws

In addition to the codes which contain most general norms, the activities of the entrepreneurs in Russia are also regulated by the federal laws. Some of them are listed below:

i) The Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies,

ii) The FL on Limited Liability Companies,

iii) The FL on Registration,

iv) The FL on Advertising,

v) The FL on Licensing,

vi) Foreign Investment Law.

Sometimes, the word «legislation» does not only refer to laws, but also to any other legal acts. For example, Clause 6 of Article 1 of the Tax Code of the RF directly states: “The laws and other normative legal acts which are referred to in this Article shall hereafter in the text of this code be referred to as ‘tax and levy legislation.’ ”

Moreover, it is necessary to remember that legal acts such as the “On Railway Transport Charter of the Russian Federation,” (RTC) and the “The Charter of Motor and Urban Surface Electric Transport,” (MUSETC) are also federal laws, despite the existence of the word «charter» in their names. This type of a legal act as the charter, does not exist in Russia, whereas this word sometimes occurs in names of various acts (not only in federal laws). When determining the legal nature of a legal act, it is always necessary to refer to its type (federal law, decree, decision, etc.) and the adopting body thereof (The President of the RF, the Government of the RF, etc.). This determination is not made by the name of the legal act.