Читать книгу Energy Fields Electrophotonic Analysis In Humans and Nature - Konstantin M.D. Korotkov - Страница 19

EPI has been used as the basis for significant research and in each instance, the reliability and value of the entire system has been confirmed.

•The EPI system has been presented at the USA National Institutes of Health to an audience of 27 world-class scientific investigators participating with Dr. Wisneski and Dr. Korotkov. This represented a diverse group of recognized experts from the US government and academic institutions.

•A Penn State study was conducted by scientists from the National Institutes on Aging, which validated that EPI can be used in high volume venues and accurately offer a consumer-friendly assessment of health status.

•EPI has also been the basis of graduate doctoral dissertations in various countries, which included research both in medical and technical fields. Short descriptions and analysis of published papers can be found in Appendix 1 of this book.

•Dr. Korotkov has hosted a series of annual international scientific congresses in Russia during the last 14 years, at which scientists from 46 countries have participated in and presented their research outcomes in a variety of research areas, utilizing EPI protocols, including some significant studies involving early cancer diagnosis.

•The meta-analysis of papers published in English or Russian language from 2003 to 2007 was presented in “The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine”. January 2010, 16(1): 13-25. Korotkov K.G., Matravers P, Orlov D.V., Williams B.O. Application of Electrophoton Capture (EPI) Analysis Based on Gas Discharge Visualization (GDV) Technique in Medicine: A Systematic Review.

“All randomized controlled studies (RCS) and systematic research reports (SRR) were evaluated using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and Jadad checklists. The search yielded 136 articles addressing four different fields of medical and psychophysiologic applications of EPI (GDV). Among them 78 were rated ‘‘high’’ on the two conventional checklists. 5303 patients with different problems were compared to more than 1000 healthy individuals.