Читать книгу The Witch-cult in Western Europe: A Study in Anthropology - Margaret Alice Murray - Страница 16
ОглавлениеFOOTNOTES:
[27] Danaeus, E 1, ch. iv.
[28] Gaule, p. 62.
[29] Cannaert, p. 45.
[30] Spalding Club Miscellany, i, pp. 171, 172.
[31] De Lancre, Tableau, pp. 398, 399.
[32] Id., L'Incredulité, p. 801.
[33] Baines, i, p. 607 note. For the name Mamillion see Layamon's Brut, p. 155, Everyman Library.
[34] Bourignon, Vie, p. 222.—Hale, p. 37.
[35] Pitcairn, iii, pp. 605, 607, 613.
[36] Hale, p. 58.
[37] Surtees Soc., xl, pp. 191, 193.
[38] Fountainhall, i. 15.
[39] Howell, vi, 660.—J. Hutchinson, ii, p. 31.
[40] Alse Gooderidge, pp. 9, 10.
[41] Boguet, p. 54.
[42] Wonderfull Discouerie of Elizabeth Sawyer, C 4, rev.
[43] County Folklore, iii, Orkney, pp. 103, 107–8.
[44] Stearne, pp. 28, 38
[45] Highland Papers, iii, pp. 16, 17.
[46] It is possible that the shoe was cleft like the modern 'hygienic' shoe. Such a shoe is described in the ballad of the Cobler of Canterbury, date 1608, as part of a woman's costume:
'Her sleevës blue, her traine behind,
With silver hookes was tucked, I find;
Her shoës broad, and forked before.'
[47] Danaeus, ch. iv.
[48] De Lancre, Tableau, p. 69.
[49] Cooper, Pleasant Treatise, p. 2.
[50] Burns Begg, p. 217.
[51] Examination of John Walsh.
[52] Potts, D 3, B 2.
[53] Baines, i, p. 607 note.
[54] Hale, p. 46.
[55] Howell, iv, 833, 836, 840, 854–5.
[56] Stearne, p. 13.—Davenport, p. 13.
[57] Stearne, pp. 22, 29, 30.
[58] Glanvil, pt. ii, pp. 136, 137, 147, 149, 156, 161–5.
[59] Hale, p. 58.
[60] Petto, p. 18.
[61] Denham Tracts, ii, p. 301.
[62] Howell, viii, 1035.
[63] Elinor Shaw and Mary Phillips, p. 6.
[64] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, pp. 51–6.
[65] Id., i, pt. ii, p. 162.
[66] Id., i, pt. ii, pp. 245–6, 239. Spelling modernized.
[67] Melville, pp. 395–6.
[68] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, p. 210.
[69] Spalding Club Miscellany, i, pp. 124, 127, 164, 172.
[70] Pitcairn, ii, p. 537.
[71] County Folklore, iii, p. 103. Orkney.
[72] From the record of the trial in the Justiciary Court, Edinburgh.
[73] Spottiswode Miscellany, ii, p. 65.
[74] Pitcairn, iii, p. 599.
[75] Sinclair, p. 122.
[76] Id., p. 47.
[77] Arnot, p. 358.
[78] Scottish Antiquary, ix, pp. 50, 51.
[79] Kinloch, pp. 114, 128, 132.
[80] Pitcairn, iii, p. 601.
[81] From the records in the Justiciary Court, Edinburgh.
[82] Pitcairn, iii, p. 603.
[83] Burns Begg, pp. 221–39.
[84] Sharpe, pp. 131, 134.
[85] Hogers, a coarse stocking without the foot.
[86] Glanvil, pt. ii, pp. 291–5, 297.
[87] Scots Magazine, 1814, p. 200.
[88] Narrative of the Sufferings of a Young Girle, pp. xxxix-xli—Sadd. Debell., pp. 38–40.
[89] A true and full Relation of the Witches of Pittenweem, p. 10.—Sinclair, p. lxxxix.
[90] Sharpe, p. 191.
[91] Camden Society, Lady Alice Kyteler, p. 3.
[92] Journal d'un bourgeois de Paris, p. 687.
[93] De Lancre, Tableau, p. 123.
[94] Bodin, p. 226.
[95] Boguet, pp. 8, 96.
[96] De Lancre, Tableau, p. 130.
[97] Id., L'Incredulité, pp. 799, 800. The second Devil is called Tramesabot on p. 802.
[98] Van Elven, La Tradition, v (1891), p. 215. Neither the witches' names nor the place are given.
[99] Cannaert, pp. 44, 53–4, 60.
[100] Fountainhall, i, p. 14.
[101] Horneck, pt. ii, p. 316.
[102] Taylor, pp. 81, 118.
[103] Green, pp. 9, 14.
[104] Howell, vi, 660, 664; J. Hutchinson, ii, pp. 31, 37.
[105] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, p. 51.
[106] Melville, p. 395.
[107] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, p. 246. Spelling modernized.
[108] Spalding Club Misc., i, p. 127.
[109] De Lancre, Tableau, p. 68.
[110] Scottish Antiquary, ix, pp. 50, 51.
[111] Pitcairn, iii, p. 601.
[112] Burns Begg, pp. 221, 223, 234, 235, 239.
[113] Taylor, p. 81.
[114] Cannaert, p. 60.
[115] Glanvil, pt. ii, p. 164.
[116] Chambers, iii, p. 298.
[117] Glanvil, pt. ii, p. 316.
[118] Sinclair, p. lxxxix.
[119] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, p. 56.
[120] Id., i, pt. ii, p. 163.
[121] Spalding Club Misc., pp. 119–21.
[122] Id., i, p. 171.
[123] Pitcairn, ii, p. 478.
[124] De Lancre, L'Incredulité, p. 36.
[125] Id., Tableau, p. 401.
[126] Potts, B 4.
[127] Wonderful Discovery of Margaret and Phillip Flower, p. 117.
[128] Sinclair, p. 160.
[129] Kinloch, p. 144.
[130] Law, p. 27 note.
[131] Cotton Mather, p. 159.
[132] Rehearsall both straung and true, par. 24.
[133] Calendar of State Papers. Domestic, 1584, p. 220.
[134] Stearne, p. 45.
[135] Gerish, The Divel's Delusions, p. 11.
[136] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, pp. 161–4.
[137] Id., ii, pp. 26–7.
[138] Hibbert, p. 578.
[139] Sinclair, p. 48.
[140] From the record in the Justiciary Office, Edinburgh.
[141] Chambers, iii, p. 299.
[142] Ravaisson, 1679, pp. 334–6.
[143] Mather, pp. 120, 125; J. Hutchinson, History, ii, pp. 37 seq.
[144] Boguet, p. 125.
[145] Lawes against Witches and Conivration, p. 7.
[146] Wilson, ii, p. 158.
[147] The trials are published by Pitcairn, i, pt. ii.
[148] There were present on this occasion thirty-nine persons, or three Covens. See chap. vii on the Organization.
[149] Bannatyne Club, Melville, Memoirs, p. 395. The sycophantic Melville adds; 'And certanly he is a man of God, and dois na wrang wittingly, bot is inclynit to all godlynes, justice and virtu; therfore God hes preserued him in the midis of many dangers.'
[150] Reg. Mag. Sig. Scot., No. 565, Feb. 7, 1550/1.
[151] Newes from Scotland. Quoted in Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, pp. 213–23.
[152] It is perhaps significant that the confession of John Fian, and the trials of both Barbara Napier and of Bothwell himself for witchcraft, have disappeared from the Justiciary Records.
[153] Burton, v, p. 283.
[154] Sandys, p. 250.
[155] De Lancre, Tableau, pp. 176, 177.
[156] Quibell, pl. xxviii. The palette itself is now in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford.
[157] Remigius, pt. i, p. 38.
[158] Pitcairn, i, pt. ii, p. 246. Spelling modernized.
[159] Melville, p. 395.
[160] Boguet, p. 56.
[161] De Lancre, Tableau, pp. 68, 73, 126.
[162] De Lancre, Tableau, pp. 225, 398.
[163] Id., L'Incredulité, pp. 799–801.
[164] Stearne, p. 13.
[165] Id., p. 22.
[166] Glanvil, pt. ii, p. 164.
[167] Petto, p. 18.
[168] Glanvil, pt. ii, pp. 294–5.
[169] Cannaert, p. 54.
[170] Melville, Memoirs, p. 395.
[171] Boguet, pp. 53–4.
[172] De Lancre, Tableau, p. 148.
[173] Howell, iv, 842.
[174] More, pp. 196–7.
[175] Kinloch, pp. 115, 129, 132.
[176] Burns Begg, pp. 219, 221, 228, 230.
[177] Pitcairn, iii, p. 603.
[178] Chambers, iii, 298.
[179] Fountainhall, i, p. 14.
[180] Narrative of the Sufferings of a Young Girle, p. xli; Sadd. Debell., p. 40.
[181] De Lancre, L'Incredulité, p. 769.
[182] Spalding Club Misc., i, p. 129.
[183] De Lancre, L'Incredulité, p. 794.
[184] Id., Tableau, p. 68.
[185] Bourignon, Parole, p. 87; Hale, p. 26.
[186] Pitcairn, iii, p. 613.
[187] From a trial in the Guernsey Greffe.
[188] Boguet, pp. 8, 70, 411.
[189] La Tradition, v (1891), p. 215.
[190] Howell, viii, 1034, 1036.
[191] Pinkerton, i, p. 473.
[192] Witches of Chelmsford, p. 34; Philobiblon Soc., viii.
[193] De Lancre, L'Incredulité, p. 805.
[194] Goldsmid, p. 12.
[195] Sinclair, p. 163.
[196] Scottish Antiquary, ix, 51.
[197] Pitcairn, iii, p. 601.
[198] Sharpe, p. 132.
[199] Scots Magazine, 1814, p. 201. Spelling modernized.
[200] Stewart, p. 175. The whole account is marred by the would-be comic style adopted by the author.
[201] Pinkerton, i, p. 473.
[202] Bodin, p. 187.
[203] Michaelis, Discourse, p. 148.
[204] Remigius, pt. i, p. 90.
[205] F. Hutchinson, Historical Essay, p. 42.
[206] Boguet, p. 141.
[207] De Lancre, Tableau, pp. 67, 68, 69, 126.
[208] Id., L'Incredulité, p. 800.
[209] Spalding Club Misc., i, p. 125. Cp. Elworthy on the Hobby-horse as the Devil, Horns of Honour, p. 140.
[210] Rehearsall both Straung and True, par. 24.
[211] Kinloch, pp. 122–3.
[212] Howell, vi, 663–4; J. Hutchinson, ii, pp. 36–7.
[213] Chartier, iii, 44–5.
[214] Boguet, p. 70.
[215] De Lancre, L'Incredulité, p. 800.
[216] Spalding Club Misc., i, p. 121.
[217] Pitcairn, iii, p. 613.
[218] Taylor, p. 98.
[219] Remigius, p. 98.
[220] Potts, E 3.
1. General
In the ceremonies for admission, as in all the other ceremonies of the cult, the essentials are the same in every community and country, though the details differ. The two points which are the essence of the ceremony are invariable: the first, that the candidates must join of their own free will and without compulsion; the second, that they devote themselves, body and soul, to the Master and his service.
The ceremonies of admission differed also according to whether the candidate were a child or an adult. The most complete record of the admission of children comes from the Basses-Pyrénées in 1609: