Читать книгу Bent Street 4.1 - Tiffany Jones - Страница 22

Bauer, R. (2018). Cybercocks and Holodicks: Renegotiating the Boundaries of Material Embodiment in Les-bi-trans-queer BDSM Practices. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 14(2), 58-82.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831.

Best, S (2020). Lifelike sex robots that ‘have a heartbeat’ and ‘breathe’ could go on sale this year, The Mirror, 11^th May, https://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/lifelike-sex-robots-have-heartbeat-22009064

Brey, P. (2005). Artifacts as social agents. Harbers, H (ed) Inside the politics of technology: Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 61-84.

Danaher, J., Earp, B. D., & Sandberg, A. (forthcoming). Should we campaign against sex robots? In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.) Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications [working title]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Draft available online ahead of print at: https://www.academia.edu/25063138/Should_we_campaign_against_sex_robots.

Das, A. (2014). The dildo as a transformative political tool: Feminist and queer perspectives. Sexuality & Culture, 18(3), 688-703.

Kubes, T. (2019). New Materialist Perspectives on Sex Robots. A Feminist Dystopia/Utopia? Social Sciences, 8(8), 224.

Latour, B. (2009). A collective of humans and nonhumans: Following Daedalus’s labyrinth, in Kaplan, D (ed) Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Maryland; Rowman & Littlefield.

Sparrow, R. (2017). Robots, rape, and representation. International Journal of Social Robotic, 9s(4), 465-477.

Jennifer Power is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe University. Her research is focused on HIV, sexual and reproductive health and fertility, LGBTI health and wellbeing, and the impact of new technologies on sex and intimacy.