Читать книгу Studies on Epidemic Influenza: Comprising Clinical and Laboratory Investigations - University of Pittsburgh. School of Medicine - Страница 20

Table of Contents

Of the group with lung involvement much may be written from a clinical standpoint, and much confusion may be brought about. Especially is this so if one has no definite idea of the pathology present, or if one enters into a discussion of the character of the infection—a point upon which there is as yet no unanimity of opinion. From the many reports which have been put forth from the base hospitals of the various cantonments, and also from the reports coming from civilian practice, it is evident that scarcely any two groups of laboratory men or any two individuals of those separate groups have the same idea as to the bacteriology and the pathology peculiar to this epidemic.

As long as there is this confusion and element of doubt in the minds of those to whom we are accustomed to look, the clinician must necessarily speak with considerable hesitancy, especially when he attempts to interpret the physical signs observed. In our own group the observations of Klotz, Guthrie, Holman and others have given us an interpretation of our clinical findings which, at present at least, is more or less satisfactory. We shall definitely keep in mind their observations and conclusions as we go on with the description of the physical signs of the chest in cases having lung involvement.

In the description of this group it will readily be seen that the lower respiratory tract stood the brunt of the infection. Of the 153 soldiers under our care, 60, or about 40 per cent., were recognized as having pneumonia. Of these, 34 had undoubted demonstrable signs, while 26 were questionable, and yet from the temperature and other symptoms we concluded there was a pneumonia. Of the 394 civilians, 189, or about 50 per cent., had pneumonia. Of this group there were again some 28 or 30 in which the diagnosis was doubtful, according to the ordinary way of making a diagnosis, but we felt sure from the temperature course that more than a simple influenza was present. In the description of the physical findings of the chest in these influenzas with lung involvement it will be readily seen why the diagnosis must sometimes be in doubt.

Before referring to the physical signs it might be well to describe the condition and general appearance of the patient when the lungs became involved. The patient who had been progressing with an apparently simple influenza, with no chest signs except those of bronchitis or tracheitis, occasionally slightly cyanotic, became more cyanotic, the elevation of temperature continued longer than three to seven days, or if it came to the normal began to rise again, his respirations gradually increased and the pain in the chest became well localized. One could safely assume that the patient had developed a lesion in the chest. This could not always be localized during the first few hours or on the first day. The evidence of increased bronchial disturbance was frequently recognized, and later impairment of resonance and diminished breath sounds associated with “a few crackles” were noted. This, so far as we can tell, may have been the only evidence of the stage of œdema or “wet lung.” After this, as the disease advanced, definitely increased vocal fremitus and rather definite tubular breathing with greater impairment of resonance were noticed. These signs were usually observed first at the apex of the left lower lobe, and from here they extended forward along the inter-lobar sulcus, or downward along the spinal column. If the lesion was noticed first on the left side, in a day or two it was found more or less definitely in the right lower lobe also. It seemed to occur more frequently first in the body of the right lobe, instead of in the apex of the lobe as on the left side. In both lobes it might spread to contiguous areas and form a massive consolidation, or it might be found in small separate areas, some of which would clear up in a day, while others would persist.

The expectoration was frothy, containing either blood or masses of yellowish, greenish purulent material floating in a watery sanguiolent or clear fluid, or enmeshed in frothy mucus. The amount of expectoration in some cases was enormous, but as a rule it was scanty. It was thick and ropy at times and distinctly annoying to the patient.

At this stage the physical signs were very much in accord with those of broncho-pneumonia. In a few hours sometimes, or in a day, the small areas of consolidation became confluent and massive consolidation was formed. It appeared as though the whole lobe would in time become solid, as in a true lobar pneumonia. Or the original areas may apparently have cleared and other areas involved, became the centers of massive consolidations. In many cases both lower lobes were thus similarly affected, and one had the physical signs of a double lobar pneumonia. However, nearly always a small angle of the lobe remained clear, thus differing from the entire lobe involvement characteristic of a true croupous pneumonia. Other signs, such as the absence of vesicular breathing and presence of the crepitant râle, moist râles of all sizes to very coarse râles, could be noted. As in certain stages of a complete consolidation, the lung might be dry; no râles present, but definite tubular breathing present. This in a day or two, or after a longer time, might give the signs of resolution. The stage of resolution, however, was almost invariably prolonged, sometimes extending over weeks. With these variable lung signs were often mingled the signs of a fibrinous or serofibrinous pleurisy, which occasionally but remarkably infrequently went on to effusion or empyæma.

[Click on any image for larger version]

As stated above, the demonstrable pathology was in the lower lobe, and more frequently in the left than in the right, only occasionally in the middle lobe, and never, we might say, in the upper lobes. The very earliest definite signs were found at the apex of the left lower lobe.

This observation seems to be entirely contradictory to that of the pathologist, who found in 65 per cent. of all cases coming to autopsy a lesion in all the lobes of the lungs (Klotz). The only explanation we can give which seems at all satisfactory to us is that the pathology in the upper and middle lobes must not have been sufficient, or must have been of such a nature that it did not yield the physical signs, i. e., definite impaired percussion resonance, increased vocal fremitus and tubular breathing, with varying shades of moist râles—signs upon which we insisted before we were willing to state definitely that there is a demonstrable pneumonia present.

In this description it has been attempted to follow the order of invasion in a lung which seemed to go through the entire course of the disease. There were, necessarily, all degrees of the process, some cases showing few signs and yet being remarkably ill, and others all of the signs with very little other evidence of serious illness.

We were continually impressed with the notion that the pathology in the lung, at least the pathology demonstrable physically, did not tell the whole story of the case, and that the outcome depended as much or possibly more upon a general infection or toxæmia of which the recognized condition in the respiratory system was only a small part. We were particularly impressed with this in the success or failure following the application of any therapeutic measures. It was quite a common remark, therefore, in the wards of the hospital among those associated in the work that “the patient died too quickly to permit of the succession of the various stages of pneumonia”; or, in the autopsy room, that if the patient had lived long enough he would have had demonstrable, well-recognized pathology of the lung, instead of the cyanotic, wet, spongy lung which was found.

The temperature course in the pulmonary cases was characterized by its irregularities, and by its being entirely out of harmony with the extent and severity of the lung invasion in so far as it could be interpreted by the physical signs. The temperature as described in a simple influenza might not come to the normal in the time of three to seven days, and might even go higher, with no demonstrable chest signs, but with every other evidence of lung involvement. Later the temperature might come down by lysis, which was the usual way, and the chest signs gradually or suddenly become evident. The temperature might remain normal throughout the rest of the course, and a lobe or even both lower lobes of the lungs be as solid as in a true lobar pneumonia. Occasionally the temperature fell by crisis, but there was no associated change in the physical signs of the chest. In short, the temperature seemed to run a course entirely independent of the physical signs in the chest. In two remarkable cases seen in consultation on two consecutive days the physicians in charge declared that no signs of consolidation could be found, though all other evidences of pneumonia were present. In the 12 hours which had elapsed from the time the last examination was made the temperature fell by crisis. At the consultation, to the surprise of the family physicians, we found both lower lobes consolidated, it having occurred apparently with the crisis. Both patients were healthy-looking, robust, young men, and both recovered with delayed resolution. In the convalescence of such cases, if the patient got up too soon or if any other indiscretion took place, a relighting of the lung occurred. From the above description it can be readily seen that a diagnosis of the conditions in the chest in influenzal pneumonia was frequently impossible, because one had to abandon all his previous ideas of pneumonia, in so far as onset, crisis, blood picture, sputum, temperature, respiratory and circulatory phenomena, physical signs and prognosis were concerned.

Assistance from the laboratory was meager, especially in the early days of the epidemic. This was due largely to the inability to get laboratory workers in sufficient numbers to follow the work through, but more largely to the fact that we were unable to interpret the unusual laboratory results which were available. When we were once fully aware of the difficulties in diagnosis which confronted us, we utilized every practical means at our disposal. Among these was an examination of the chest with the X-ray. On account of lack of facilities and of help, it was impossible to make routine X-ray examinations of the chest in all cases. Besides, it was difficult to interpret the X-ray findings, on account of the unusual character of the lesions. Also, many of the patients were so desperately ill one hesitated to disturb them. We hear that other clinics had similar experiences, and that very little substantial help came from the X-ray, except in cases with complications. Several attempts were made to determine the kind of shadow, if any, the “cyanotic, œdematous, wet” lung would make, but no satisfactory observations have been forthcoming. From our own observations and from the discussions of other observers, it would seem to us that the stereoscopic examination of these chests is the only possible way of getting satisfactory plate readings in these cases where the pathology seems so lawless in its extent and peculiar in its distribution. This method of examination, however, demands facilities convenient at the bedside and perfect co-operation of the patient—difficult conditions to meet under the circumstances. In the acute cases, when the desire to make a diagnosis not only of the presence but of the extent of the disease was keen, X-ray examination was largely impractical. In cases of delayed resolution, or in cases with complications with prolonged convalescence, X-ray examinations were extremely helpful.