Читать книгу MNC - Василий Ласовский - Страница 12

“It took six months for the average Cub to learn all the truth, to discover that he could never go home again in a very literal way. It wasn't Eternity's law, alone, that stopped him, but the frigid fact that home as he knew it might very well no longer exist, might, in a sense, never have existed.”

– The End of Eternity (Isaac Asimov, 1955)

(link in Russian)

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/1388359

Comment from the article: “Probability waves exist in quantum mechanics, right? Where the probability is maximum – there is ‘our reality’. Where is the other ‘probability maximum’ (the wave has multiple maxima) there is a ‘parallel reality’.”

Posted on May 5, 2024 at 11:52 am:

You will say that it is normal for events of different significance to follow each other, while more important events may well follow less important ones, and vice versa.

In the case of a famous character, it is the Resurrection that is the central event, and it is believed that ‘he deliberately went to the cross and death, so that the Resurrection event would come later.’ Of course, we can say that he knew his future, and decided to implement it. But there is a nuance…

The future, as many people understand it, is a probabilistic concept, and if a person has a certain goal, then there are several possible ways to achieve it. For example, a human can sacrifice himself in order to ‘quickly’ reach death, or achieve it in a similar way to death, but having lived qualitatively and fully all his life, until the last day, as the creator gave him. In both cases, the goal is the same, only in the first case, a person voluntarily (desirefully) seeks to violate the laws of the universe.

But if in the case of the traditional course of his life, a person cannot always obtain the desired goal? This is possible only if this goal is not a probabilistic, but a real event, only from the future, and, therefore, this event is stronger than current events, its gravity is immutable and overwhelming, and it is a sign of the impending inverse personal psychohistory of a given person. That is, this event is coming from the future, but it does not belong to the probabilistic structure of reality, and if an individual does not change his fate at a given point in time, then he will miss the intersection with the real future and remain on the path to his probabilistic future.

Opened on July 30, 2024, comment to the article:

A former NASA scientist conducts a series of experiments to prove that we live in a simulation (link in Russian)

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/1405030

“3. Does the wind blow if there is no person nearby? No, it's not blowing. Masses of air move. But there is no wind, if you can understand it.

4. The higher-ranked the ‘player of life’, the more reality he forms around himself.”

On the evening of August 9, 2024, I talked to East about my inverse psychohistory and for the first time I explained more or less completely, what it is.

First, of course, it is the life story of a particular person. Not necessarily mine, but other psychohistories with different personalities are quite possible.

Secondly, this is not an ordinary story, when events follow one another and often one follows from another, in an order determined by the passage of time, but just the opposite, events in a human's life are predetermined, but not in the past, but in the future.

A situation where events are predetermined in the past is called a ‘predicted life’, which implies that the individual is limited in his path, and makes decisions to be in the future at a certain point and in the right state. It's a kind of fatalism.

In the case of an ‘inverse’ life of a person, he is not limited in making decisions, and being in the future, it is not difficult to ‘adapt’ to his already past life path. Naturally, I mean a timeless influence, but it is difficult to imagine it, it will be much easier to realize it as an ‘influence from the future’.

I have already written several ‘entities’, but what difference does it make if there was an influence from the past, from the future, or from the timeless vector? The difference is fundamental. If the influence was woven into the fabric of existence in the past, then this is the most natural path, because when created, the fabric of the world will live in harmony with the foreign invasion. In other cases (from the future, or due to a timeless influence), the fabric of existence will be changed ‘on the fly’, and these deformations will undoubtedly lead to a loss of its stability. And of course, such barbaric transformations will not be from a good life, but will arise as a result of the accumulation of unresolved problems.

Because of the alien nature of changes, the MNC paradox arises, when the impact should be reduced to the minimum necessary, so that the object of impact feels its illusory, fantasy connection, and at the same time its life should undergo changes only to the minimum extent. In other words, according to my theory, some fictional, creative connection will make a difference and be worth making small changes to the world.

I can reason that I do not feel any connection at all by nature, and I do not seek or need any connections; as I wrote earlier, this is the foundation of my Infinity. But I believe that the process of establishing a connection is the creativity (task) of the Spirit.

A clear consequence of my theory is the freedom of expression of human will.

In my psychohistory, the key point is to reject the probabilistic future. If the future is predetermined, then there are no probabilities, the event either occurs or does not, which greatly simplifies the life of a particular person.

An important role is played by external events, which can either remain (for the participating character) superfluous garbage, or acquire some importance (regardless of the time and place of their location), and in this case – be part of his personal psychohistory. And at the same time, they do not enter as a probability, and their internal transformation (adjustment) is not required, they arrive in their original, complete form. We can say that if we take an event with a 100% probability, then this is much more efficient than taking the same event with a probability of say 30%. Also, events with a 100% probability of occurrence give this person independence in their analysis and operation.

Of course, it is a great happiness for me that with these consequences that I have accumulated while exploring my inner world, I have ‘turned off’ the probabilistic nature of events from my life. I don't like to hell the hypothesis that many Earthlings use that ‘everything in our life happens with some probability’. I believe that this is a road to nowhere, a dead-end and unpromising path of personal development.

What significance does the psychohistory of a particular human have for other individuals? Of course, I can assume that there is none, but seriously, I do not know what effect it can produce, just as I do not know what color the house I am observing is painted, but on the other hand, which I do not see.

Opened on January 14, 2025 at 12:25 pm:

The anthropic principle (first link in Russian)

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Антропный_принцип

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle

“The anthropic principle – the argument ‘We see the universe like this, because only in such a universe could an observer, a person, have appeared.’ <…>

Wheeler's aforementioned PAP (Participatory Anthropic Principle) means that universes without an intelligent observer do not acquire the status of reality. The reason for this is that only an observer is able to perform a reduction of the quantum state, which translates an ensemble of possible states into a single, real one. <…>

The phrase ‘anthropic principle’ first appeared in Brandon Carter's paper at a symposium in Krakow in 1973. Carter, a theoretical astrophysicist, articulated the anthropic principle in reaction to the Copernican principle, which states that humans do not occupy a privileged position in the Universe. Carter said: ‘Although our situation is not necessarily central, it is inevitably privileged to some extent.’”

The Von Neumann reduction, or wave function collapse (first link in Russian)

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Редукция_фон_Неймана

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse

“Von Neumann reduction (wave function collapse) is an instantaneous change in the description of the quantum state (wave function) of an object that occurs during measurement.

Since this process is essentially non-local, and the instantaneity of the change formally implies the propagation of interactions faster than the speed of light, it is assumed that it is not a physical process, but a mathematical method of description.”