Читать книгу The Third. Covid liberalism - Алмаз Браев - Страница 10

COMMUNIST THALMANN IN THE ROLE OF IVAN THE FOOL

So, in order to the ideas of the people’s state to be at the top or dominating, it is necessary to have a certain number of conditional older brothers. Younger brothers get the upper hand when this absolute authority is not present. All the old city elite, all these doctors, teachers, lawyers and officials are once again turning into supporters of a hard hand, authoritarianism, do not recognize any tramps from the street, no proletarians with their equalization and social justice fake. Everything that these ragamuffins shouted under the direction of their leaders, all these slogans painted on marching banners, all this was a lie, hypocrisy from the point of view of the urban elite. The traditional perception of caste has not disappeared anywhere. It took a slightly different form. All civil servants and intellectuals turn into conservatives at once. But not in the form of those retrogrades that want to return the feudal castes, no one has yet gone mad to reverse the history of the Revival of feudalism with its rigid castes is possible only with little urbanization at all. Only for nomads is possible. For urbanized peoples, such a revival of history is de facto impossible. The past elite in the form of remids wants to stop this farce of legal equality, even at the cost of curtailing their rights. After all, the Republic is always a Horde of all the younger brothers. It was their democracy, their endless chatter, their permissiveness that led to the crisis. In fact, they violated the law of social hierarchy and led to anarchy. If it is not the elder brother who rules, or even the father, but the younger ones who want authority, this will inevitably lead any family to ruin. If you gather the will of all the younger ones in the Republican Parliament, you will get a violation of tradition within the entire society. This is how all the old intelligentsia turns into supporters of autocracy, dictatorship, and then Nazism, if there is a need to unite everyone with one idea from teachers to lumpmen.

But wait, because in Germany in the 30s, the Communist party also marched cheerfully on squares and streets. In the ranks of the KPD and under the hand of the Communist leader, Telman were a million workers. How did they differ from the Republican younger brothers? Why were they for an even more left-wing social Republic? At least in words in their slogans of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

Everyone who stands for the Republic is a younger brother by definition. It is inferior to others in Patriarchal law. In turn, the one who is inferior in age to all the brothers is a Communist. There are no real brothers in revkon. There are brothers in reflection. Proletarians are the young of the townspeople. They are zeremids. Why did they not join the ranks of the bourgeois and petty-bourgeois Democrats? Вecause all the places in the market and especially in the parliament were occupied when they arrived. The burghers have already filled the city. The only places left for survival are in factories.

Now, the younger brother is not only due to age, but also the practice of life is obliged to get a family by the deadline. He will have children. He becomes a father too. Now he is not even an older brother, but a father, which is even worse for the Republic. Each time he will rule and take the side of all the older brothers and the existing elite. Right or wrong?

The fact is that every father is the founder of a dynasty, and therefore of a family tradition. Whose footsteps will his son follow? Even if it goes to the same factory.

Of course, the Germans under more favorable circumstances could prevail not Bolshevism, but Nazism. That is, the Institute of Junior Republicans of the proletarian type. In this case, the German service elite would have changed its Nazi orientation and become entirely international? Quite possible. For all remids, the state comes first. Let it be not German, but international German – what difference does it make? It does not matter which leader would curb the market bacchanalia.

But Stalin himself would not have needed an advanced Soviet Germany. Stalin needed a German leader-the younger brother and puppet, the sexless leader Telman. Telman must fulfill the will of another form of seniority – the Communist Moscow regime, which by this time was a continuation of the Russian feudal tradition. Stalin’s officials and nomenclature were only called Bolsheviks. The real Bolsheviks, world internationalists, were not yet killed by Stalin de facto, but removed from power. He leaned on his «sons» looking into his mouth, also almost ideologically sexless, but willing to start a family. All according to the same laws of tradition. A quiet heifer sucks the two cows. In the Russian tradition, you don’t have to be the oldest to get an inheritance. In the Russian tradition, obedience itself promised not only pies, but also the love of parents. Any poor Ivan is a fool or Emelya on the stove are not just a folk heroes.