Читать книгу World under clowns - Алмаз Браев - Страница 4

There are other situations

People need heroes only on the pain of death. During a democracy, all of humanity is moving towards the abyss in order to get smarter through war.

Modern humanity resembles a dinosaur.

The main problem of modern humanity is the fear of leaders. Modern humanity agrees with the official government because it cannot do anything: every current government cannot be banned or ignored by the type of social networks. Social networks show a massive choice – buffoons, clowns, comedians, at the very least dogs and cats, on the basis of which the choice of helpless old men and other inarticulate leaders is made "with the help of democracy" – as we see, the current political bohemia and the world behind the scenes enjoy the fear of the crowd in front of real, natural leaders and itself already consists of such people.

Such a state of fear of the crowd in front of whole people, each of whom causes envy and complexity of the electorate itself at the same time (social networks are an excellent slice of envy and complexes), gives an outlet to all sorts of scammers, hypocrites, spineless conformists, that is, populists who even outwardly look miserable, but do not cause envy and complexes at the moment of their screams. Populists, like flesh and blood of a complexed inert crowd, "their guys" are taking great advantage of the situation. The crowd enjoys the impudence of an active crook, and it turns out to be self-satisfaction, another show of a political clown now.

Is it possible to blame a crowd of small, squeezed in their shell people in the current clowning, balancing at the moment on the brink of nuclear war, as the last show? Yes, it is possible and necessary. But first of all, you need to know that this is a democracy. And little people really want to see a show relaxing their self-esteem; the dinosaur of humanity turns out to have a very small head, and a huge body falls into the abyss when the dinosaur's head chews a fern leaf.

Zerots are not afraid of death, and they are afraid of shame.

The elite that doesn't want to change

So why does the traditional elite, the elite of the tribe or the elite of the feudal lords – the Zerots – not want to change?

Actually, why should they change if that's what you want?

The Zerots are not just unwilling to change; they are simply not trifles on the example of the clowns of democracy, to which everyone is accustomed. Modern people do not think strategically, do not plan, and do not anticipate fate for years before; they would like to live today's day to the end and have fun, and Zerot is not. The Zerots don't care about modern dance. They live like the characters of the Bible. They don't just live for a few centuries. It doesn't happen that way. That's about how all the feudal lords of the nobility think. Zerots rule and change places only when the time is right. When he grows up, the replacement will mature. And this replacement is their children. If not their sons, then the most worthy of the relatives changes the ruler. Everything else is the whim of idiots who are used to living with the main characters all their lives in one movie session. And the crisis also plays on the desire to change the rulers. And again, only the selfishness of consumers generates desire for the manager to leave. But he's not leaving. Not because he is waiting for the next election. If he is a Zeroth, he is preparing a replacement for himself. The traditional elite has never consulted with the rabble. Only in very wild times, when anyone could reach the leader, would the leader yield. Well, then, not everyone would dare to take responsibility for the life of the people. The elite is the elite. While some just live, and perform the function of life from birth to old age, others are already waiting for death. The rabble is afraid of death, Zeroth is preparing for it. Zeroth cares what they say about him. The Zerots inherit their name.

They behave as if they were born a long time ago.

And if a crisis has happened, what does it mean for Zeroth? Let's get rid of our problems a little bit.

What is a crisis for tradition in general, and how does a traditional crisis differ from a market one?

That's just the mechanism or reasons for the replacement that will show all the difference between traditional thinking and consumer-uniform.

For traditional peoples, a crisis or, more precisely, force majeure is when circumstances threaten life. And what threatens the fate or the prospect of living as always? This is if some disaster has struck. The people do not get what they need to complete the annual cycle. And what made it possible to complete the annual cycle? These are, of course, edibles. Primitive technology and dependence on nature forced us to narrow it down. And first of all, to reproduce. If the farmers could afford to sit still, then the nomads were driven by the lack of food wherever they looked. All the weak and sick died. But as the leader responsible for these losses? Only a modern fool would come up with such an idea. No natural cataclysm would damage his authority. The first thought is a common punishment. Supernatural strength. But here, the leader is not responsible for communicating with an unknown force. The time of such a crisis is the appearance of a priest on the stage. In modern terms, let's say the Prime minister. It is his servants who have not given something to the spirits or to God. The leader or leader is responsible for defense or attack. If he is a farmer and a leader of farmers, then for defense; if he is a nomad, then for the attack. That's what a traditional force majeure is! Only the failure of a military campaign (foreign policy in modern terms means) or even death causes rotation among the leaders. One, he's a young replacement, changes the old one or the loser or the deceased. If he loses, he is a coward; if he wins, he is a hero. And glory to him!

That is, every crisis, in modern economic terms, is the beginning of the movement of the elite in any direction. If the elite is nomadic in the past, it comes; if it is agricultural, it holds the defense. In the modern case of universalism, the crisis is overcome systematically – both by the defense (against sanctions) and attack (by an active foreign policy when shit is in your camp). And even despite the general system and the surrounding universalism, Zerots are not chosen from the crowd by the so-called democratic elections; they cause only a lot of noise and confusion but from their environment. Even modern oligarchs, for whom, it would seem, the gods are money, behave as if they were born under ancient feudalism.