Читать книгу Grand Unified Theory - Arkay Nair - Страница 6

My Discourse on the Big Bang and Black Holes

Abstract

The Big Bang Theory as the origin of the universe is flawed. Newton’s third law of motion states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If the Big Bang Theory is true, then there should have been a corresponding implosion that created the center of the universe. The principle of observer equivalency is applied to an imaginary observation of the Big Bang by our defined observers, and their inferences are explained from each observer’s view point. A modified theory called the “Bing Bang” is proposed to describe the possible formation of the earth in a preexisting infinite universe through a supernova type of explosion/implosion of a companion star of our sun when it reached or exceeded the Chandrasekhar limit.

Discourse

The Big Bang Theory, as it is understood today, is flawed. It does not fit in with the classical laws of physics that we have learned and accepted. Newton’s third law of motion states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If we may use the word “bing” to denote an implosion, we may justifiably ask the question, “Where is the bing?” Did it create the earth? If so, the earth is the center of the universe. Did it create a big black hole in the center of our galaxy or any galaxy? If so, that black hole is the center of the universe. Mathematically speaking, the origin of the universe becomes a closed set if we accept the big bang theory, while the end of the universe remains an open set. Naturally, we may then accept that the universe has a center but no defined periphery. The problem to solve now is whether this center is the Earth or some other material body. Let us apply our logical minds to this question to come up with some possible theories using the principle of observer equivalency that we adopted in a previous discourse.

We, the earthlings, see the universe as finite with the sky as the boundary. Earthlings observe the heavenly bodies, all moving from east to west, uniformly, centripetal to the earth; so that they don’t collide with each other and fall to the center. Each body has a free path to travel, similar to the flow of traffic on a highway. The cosmos is also protected by its law of speed limit, c, which no particle is allowed to exceed. According to Hubble, the universe is still expanding because of the observed red-shift of some distant galaxies. Well, what about the blue sky? The blue sky tells us that the universe is contracting! Since we observe both these phenomena, we may safely assume that our universe is in equilibrium, with inflationary tendencies counterbalanced equally with deflationary tendencies. It is therefore safe to assume that the universe is in a steady state of equilibrium. The existence of Cosmic Background Radiation tells us that the sky is falling (not pigeon droppings!), indicating the deflationary tendencies of our universe counterbalancing inflationary tendencies.

Assuming that the Big Bang Theory is true, let us see what our four observers would be seeing if they were fortunate enough to witness this cataclysmic event. The earth would experience the implosive aspect of the Big Bang as it is formed by the crushing force kicked back by escaping plasma matter. The sky and all the aliens living out there would experience the explosive aspect of the Big Bang phenomenon. An earthling, who is right in the middle of this cataclysmic event, would feel the impact of the explosion and the implosion. She will see the earth being formed by the imploding plasma while the heavens are being formed by the exploding plasma. She has an equal chance of being dropped down to the newly formed earth to become an earthling; or of being flung into outer space to become an alien out there.

In my opinion, the Big Bang Theory should only be applied in discussing the origin of the earth and not that of the universe. We do observe supernova explosions and the gradual fading away of a star into oblivion. If we accept the idea of an infinite universe, any search for its origin or demise is futile. However, we can definitely search for the origin of the earth, since we know that it is finite. That is why I propose a hypothesis that the earth was formed in a supernova type of explosion/implosion at some point in time that is calculable (perhaps 4.5 billion years ago). Binary star systems are quite common in the universe, and it is quite possible that our sun had a companion star larger than itself. When that star reached or exceeded its Chandrasekhar limit, it may have exploded, forming the earth as the implosive part of the equation, while an equal amount of matter escaped into the space in the form of electromagnetic radiation.

The earth is now in a state of equilibrium, with explosive forces counterbalanced with equal implosive forces. Hubble’s theory of an expanding universe is counterbalanced through the constant shower of cosmic background radiation, which is in fact telling us that the sky is falling! The sky, of course, is made up of nothing other than plasma matter.

Summary

If we believe that the universe is infinite, we cannot assign a beginning to it. If we accept the Big Bang Theory, we must also accept the fact that our universe is finite or semi- finite. A big bang has to be accompanied by a big bing—by which I mean a corresponding implosion that would form the center, from where matter exploded, according to Newton’s third law of motion. It is more logical to search for the origin of the earth, which we can see as finite in an infinite world. The most probable origin of the earth may be through a supernova type of explosion/implosion of a companion star of our sun when it reached or exceeded the Chandrasekhar limit in size.