Читать книгу Automotive Safety Integrity Level A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Who approved the Automotive Safety Integrity Level scope?
<--- Score
2. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
3. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Automotive Safety Integrity Level work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
4. What requirements are specified in the clause on Production and Operation?
<--- Score
5. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Automotive Safety Integrity Level goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
6. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
7. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
8. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
9. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
10. What is the scope?
<--- Score
11. Is the Automotive Safety Integrity Level scope manageable?
<--- Score
12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
13. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Automotive Safety Integrity Level leverage and how?
<--- Score
14. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automotive Safety Integrity Level brings?
<--- Score
15. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
16. Is special Automotive Safety Integrity Level user knowledge required?
<--- Score
17. What happens if Automotive Safety Integrity Level’s scope changes?
<--- Score
18. How to reconcile seemingly conflicting requirements of safety and efficiency?
<--- Score
19. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
20. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
21. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
22. Will a Automotive Safety Integrity Level production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
23. Have all basic functions of Automotive Safety Integrity Level been defined?
<--- Score
24. What would be the goal or target for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level’s improvement team?
<--- Score
25. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
26. Why is the minimum distance (safety distance) required and which factors play a role here?
<--- Score
27. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
28. Who has to be charged as responsible in case of an accident?
<--- Score
29. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
31. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
32. When is/was the Automotive Safety Integrity Level start date?
<--- Score
33. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
34. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
35. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automotive Safety Integrity Level?
<--- Score
36. What are (control) requirements for Automotive Safety Integrity Level Information?
<--- Score
37. How do you manage changes in Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements?
<--- Score
38. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
39. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
40. Why are you doing Automotive Safety Integrity Level and what is the scope?
<--- Score
41. What are the core elements of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level business case?
<--- Score
42. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
43. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
44. Are accountability and ownership for Automotive Safety Integrity Level clearly defined?
<--- Score
45. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
46. Is it true that the safety case regulatory approach leads to self-regulation by industry?
<--- Score
47. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
48. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
49. How are consistent Automotive Safety Integrity Level definitions important?
<--- Score
50. Is the scope of Automotive Safety Integrity Level defined?
<--- Score
51. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
52. How do you hand over Automotive Safety Integrity Level context?
<--- Score
53. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
55. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements?
<--- Score
58. What Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
59. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
60. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
61. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
62. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
63. How did the Automotive Safety Integrity Level manager receive input to the development of a Automotive Safety Integrity Level improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
64. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
65. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
66. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
67. How do you catch Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
69. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
70. How would you define Automotive Safety Integrity Level leadership?
<--- Score
71. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
72. What is the scope of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level effort?
<--- Score
73. What Automotive Safety Integrity Level services do you require?
<--- Score
74. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
75. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements complete?
<--- Score
76. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
77. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
78. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
79. Are complex designs required for safety?
<--- Score
80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
81. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
82. What is the definition of Automotive Safety Integrity Level excellence?
<--- Score
83. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
84. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
85. What is the scope of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?
<--- Score
86. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
87. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
88. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
89. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
90. How do you keep the different kinds of safety-related requirements consistent?
<--- Score
91. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
92. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
93. What system do you use for gathering Automotive Safety Integrity Level information?
<--- Score
94. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
95. How do you think the partners involved in Automotive Safety Integrity Level would have defined success?
<--- Score
96. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
97. Who are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
98. What was the context?
<--- Score
99. What are the enforcement methods used by regulators under the safety case?
<--- Score
100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
101. Has the Automotive Safety Integrity Level work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
102. Does system satisfy technical system safety requirements?
<--- Score
103. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
104. Is there a clear Automotive Safety Integrity Level case definition?
<--- Score
105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automotive Safety Integrity Level results are met?
<--- Score
106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Automotive Safety Integrity Level management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
108. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
109. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
110. How does the Automotive Safety Integrity Level manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level study?
<--- Score
112. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
113. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automotive Safety Integrity Level? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
114. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
116. Can the software tool malfunction that it introduces or fails to detect errors of safety requirements?
<--- Score
117. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level use cases?
<--- Score
118. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
119. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
120. How will the Automotive Safety Integrity Level team and the group measure complete success of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?
<--- Score
121. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
122. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
123. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automotive Safety Integrity Level activities?
<--- Score
124. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
125. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
126. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements testable?
<--- Score
127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
128. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level required?
<--- Score
129. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
130. Is there a critical path to deliver Automotive Safety Integrity Level results?
<--- Score
131. Is there any additional Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition of success?
<--- Score
132. What is in scope?
<--- Score
133. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
134. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
135. How can the value of Automotive Safety Integrity Level be defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Automotive Safety Integrity Level Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
