Читать книгу Automotive Safety Integrity Level A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
2. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
3. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
4. Have you included everything in your Automotive Safety Integrity Level cost models?
<--- Score
5. How is the value delivered by Automotive Safety Integrity Level being measured?
<--- Score
6. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
7. How do you mitigate the impact of errors?
<--- Score
8. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
9. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
10. How to quantify safety of measures?
<--- Score
11. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
12. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
13. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
14. How frequently do you track Automotive Safety Integrity Level measures?
<--- Score
15. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
16. Among the Automotive Safety Integrity Level product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
17. What is the Automotive Safety Integrity Level business impact?
<--- Score
18. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
19. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
20. Are there competing Automotive Safety Integrity Level priorities?
<--- Score
21. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
22. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
23. How frequently do you verify your Automotive Safety Integrity Level strategy?
<--- Score
24. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
25. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
26. What can be assumed to be the failure, which would act as cause leading to the hazardous situation?
<--- Score
27. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
28. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
29. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
30. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
31. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
32. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
33. What is your Automotive Safety Integrity Level quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
34. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
35. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
36. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
37. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
38. Why a Automotive Safety Integrity Level focus?
<--- Score
39. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
40. What is the safest, most cost-effective and efficacious method for bleaching teeth?
<--- Score
41. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
42. Does a Automotive Safety Integrity Level quantification method exist?
<--- Score
43. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
44. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
45. What are your key Automotive Safety Integrity Level organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
46. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
47. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
48. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level investment costs?
<--- Score
49. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
50. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
51. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
52. How will you measure your Automotive Safety Integrity Level effectiveness?
<--- Score
53. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
54. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
55. How do your measurements capture actionable Automotive Safety Integrity Level information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
56. The approach of traditional Automotive Safety Integrity Level works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
57. Is the cost worth the Automotive Safety Integrity Level effort ?
<--- Score
58. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
59. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
60. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
61. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
62. What are the current costs of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level process?
<--- Score
63. How can a Automotive Safety Integrity Level test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
64. Will Automotive Safety Integrity Level have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
65. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
66. What is the optimum way to perform trade-offs between safety and cost/schedule?
<--- Score
67. How do you verify Automotive Safety Integrity Level completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
68. What potential environmental factors impact the Automotive Safety Integrity Level effort?
<--- Score
69. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
70. How do you verify if Automotive Safety Integrity Level is built right?
<--- Score
71. What details are required of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level cost structure?
<--- Score
72. How do you measure efficient delivery of Automotive Safety Integrity Level services?
<--- Score
73. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
74. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
75. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
76. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
77. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
78. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Automotive Safety Integrity Level services/products?
<--- Score
79. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
80. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
81. What is the impact on the safety/systems engineering process?
<--- Score
82. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
83. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
84. Do you know that an incorrect software reuse caused a space rocket to explode?
<--- Score
85. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
86. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
87. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
88. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
89. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
90. Does the Automotive Safety Integrity Level task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
91. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
92. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
93. Are indirect costs charged to the Automotive Safety Integrity Level program?
<--- Score
94. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
95. How do you verify the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements quality?
<--- Score
96. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
97. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
98. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level key cost drivers?
<--- Score
99. What are the operational costs after Automotive Safety Integrity Level deployment?
<--- Score
100. What is the impact of the new functionality on the safety concept?
<--- Score
101. How sensitive must the Automotive Safety Integrity Level strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
102. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
103. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
104. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
105. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
106. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
107. Which Automotive Safety Integrity Level impacts are significant?
<--- Score
108. How do you verify and validate the Automotive Safety Integrity Level data?
<--- Score
109. What are hidden Automotive Safety Integrity Level quality costs?
<--- Score
110. Are Automotive Safety Integrity Level vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
111. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
112. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
113. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
114. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
115. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
116. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
117. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
118. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
119. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
120. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
121. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
122. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
123. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
124. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
125. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
126. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
127. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
128. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
129. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
130. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
131. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
132. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
133. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
134. What is the impact on the system architecture?
<--- Score
135. How can you measure Automotive Safety Integrity Level in a systematic way?
