Читать книгу Conversion As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

Оглавление

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What are the record-keeping requirements of Conversion as a service activities?

<--- Score

2. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<--- Score

3. What happens if Conversion as a service’s scope changes?

<--- Score

4. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Conversion as a service? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

5. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

6. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

7. Scope of sensitive information?

<--- Score

8. What gets examined?

<--- Score

9. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<--- Score

10. How do you manage unclear Conversion as a service requirements?

<--- Score

11. What would be the goal or target for a Conversion as a service’s improvement team?

<--- Score

12. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

13. What is out of scope?

<--- Score

14. Who is gathering information?

<--- Score

15. Is the Conversion as a service scope manageable?

<--- Score

16. What was the context?

<--- Score

17. Is there any additional Conversion as a service definition of success?

<--- Score

18. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

19. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<--- Score

20. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Conversion as a service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

21. How are consistent Conversion as a service definitions important?

<--- Score

22. What is the definition of success?

<--- Score

23. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

24. What is the scope of Conversion as a service?

<--- Score

25. What are the core elements of the Conversion as a service business case?

<--- Score

26. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

27. What sources do you use to gather information for a Conversion as a service study?

<--- Score

28. Are accountability and ownership for Conversion as a service clearly defined?

<--- Score

29. Who approved the Conversion as a service scope?

<--- Score

30. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

31. How would you define Conversion as a service leadership?

<--- Score

32. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

33. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

34. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

35. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<--- Score

36. Has the Conversion as a service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

37. Has your scope been defined?

<--- Score

38. Who is gathering Conversion as a service information?

<--- Score

39. Who are the Conversion as a service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

40. How do you gather Conversion as a service requirements?

<--- Score

41. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<--- Score

42. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<--- Score

43. How can the value of Conversion as a service be defined?

<--- Score

44. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<--- Score

45. Are the Conversion as a service requirements testable?

<--- Score

46. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

47. How do you manage scope?

<--- Score

48. How do you manage changes in Conversion as a service requirements?

<--- Score

49. How will the Conversion as a service team and the group measure complete success of Conversion as a service?

<--- Score

50. What is the worst case scenario?

<--- Score

51. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<--- Score

52. What is out-of-scope initially?

<--- Score

53. Have all basic functions of Conversion as a service been defined?

<--- Score

54. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

55. Is Conversion as a service currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

56. What sort of initial information to gather?

<--- Score

57. The political context: who holds power?

<--- Score

58. What is the definition of Conversion as a service excellence?

<--- Score

59. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Conversion as a service work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

60. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<--- Score

61. Do you have a Conversion as a service success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

62. How do you gather requirements?

<--- Score

63. When is/was the Conversion as a service start date?

<--- Score

64. How do you catch Conversion as a service definition inconsistencies?

<--- Score

65. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

66. What Conversion as a service requirements should be gathered?

<--- Score

67. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Conversion as a service changes?

<--- Score

68. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<--- Score

69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<--- Score

70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

71. How do you hand over Conversion as a service context?

<--- Score

72. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

<--- Score

73. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

74. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

75. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

76. Will a Conversion as a service production readiness review be required?

<--- Score

77. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

78. Is there a clear Conversion as a service case definition?

<--- Score

79. What system do you use for gathering Conversion as a service information?

<--- Score

80. What intelligence can you gather?

<--- Score

81. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<--- Score

82. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<--- Score

83. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Conversion as a service leverage and how?

<--- Score

84. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

85. Is there a critical path to deliver Conversion as a service results?

<--- Score

86. Is the scope of Conversion as a service defined?

<--- Score

87. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

88. Why are you doing Conversion as a service and what is the scope?

<--- Score

89. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

90. What Conversion as a service services do you require?

<--- Score

91. What are the Conversion as a service use cases?

<--- Score

92. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

93. How did the Conversion as a service manager receive input to the development of a Conversion as a service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

94. Is special Conversion as a service user knowledge required?

<--- Score

95. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

96. Where can you gather more information?

<--- Score

97. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

98. What is the scope of the Conversion as a service effort?

<--- Score

99. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

<--- Score

100. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

101. Is the Conversion as a service scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

102. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Conversion as a service brings?

<--- Score

103. Is Conversion as a service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

104. Do you all define Conversion as a service in the same way?

<--- Score

105. How do you build the right business case?

<--- Score

106. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

107. What are the Conversion as a service tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

108. How do you gather the stories?

<--- Score

109. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

110. Are the Conversion as a service requirements complete?

<--- Score

111. How does the Conversion as a service manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

112. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

113. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<--- Score

114. What are (control) requirements for Conversion as a service Information?

<--- Score

115. Is Conversion as a service required?

<--- Score

116. What are the requirements for audit information?

<--- Score

117. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

118. What information should you gather?

<--- Score

119. What is the context?

<--- Score

120. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

121. How have you defined all Conversion as a service requirements first?

<--- Score

122. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Conversion as a service?

<--- Score

123. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

124. What is in scope?

<--- Score

125. What are the tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

126. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<--- Score

127. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<--- Score

128. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Conversion as a service results are met?

<--- Score

129. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

130. Are all requirements met?

<--- Score

131. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Conversion as a service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Conversion As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх