Читать книгу Personally Identifiable Information A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Personally-identifiable information work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
2. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
3. What are the Personally-identifiable information use cases?
<--- Score
4. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
5. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
6. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
7. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
8. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
9. Has a Personally-identifiable information requirement not been met?
<--- Score
10. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
11. Will team members regularly document their Personally-identifiable information work?
<--- Score
12. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
13. Why are you doing Personally-identifiable information and what is the scope?
<--- Score
14. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Personally-identifiable information? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
15. Is there any additional Personally-identifiable information definition of success?
<--- Score
16. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
17. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
18. What system do you use for gathering Personally-identifiable information information?
<--- Score
19. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Personally-identifiable information?
<--- Score
20. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
21. How have you defined all Personally-identifiable information requirements first?
<--- Score
22. How do you manage unclear Personally-identifiable information requirements?
<--- Score
23. How do you manage changes in Personally-identifiable information requirements?
<--- Score
24. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
25. Is there a clear Personally-identifiable information case definition?
<--- Score
26. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
27. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
28. Who are the Personally-identifiable information improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
29. Has the Personally-identifiable information work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
30. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Personally-identifiable information changes?
<--- Score
31. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
32. Are improvement team members fully trained on Personally-identifiable information?
<--- Score
33. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
34. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
35. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
36. What are the core elements of the Personally-identifiable information business case?
<--- Score
37. Who approved the Personally-identifiable information scope?
<--- Score
38. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
39. What is the scope of Personally-identifiable information?
<--- Score
40. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
41. Is there a critical path to deliver Personally-identifiable information results?
<--- Score
42. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
43. Will a Personally-identifiable information production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
44. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
45. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Personally-identifiable information results are met?
<--- Score
46. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
47. What happens if Personally-identifiable information’s scope changes?
<--- Score
48. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
49. What are (control) requirements for Personally-identifiable information Information?
<--- Score
50. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
51. What is the scope of the Personally-identifiable information effort?
<--- Score
52. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
53. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
54. What are the record-keeping requirements of Personally-identifiable information activities?
<--- Score
55. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
56. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
57. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
58. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
59. Is Personally-identifiable information linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
60. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
61. How will the Personally-identifiable information team and the group measure complete success of Personally-identifiable information?
<--- Score
62. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
63. What Personally-identifiable information services do you require?
<--- Score
64. What Personally-identifiable information requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
65. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
66. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
67. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
68. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
69. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
70. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
71. Is the Personally-identifiable information scope manageable?
<--- Score
72. Who is gathering Personally-identifiable information information?
<--- Score
73. What are the Personally-identifiable information tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
74. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
75. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
76. What would be the goal or target for a Personally-identifiable information’s improvement team?
<--- Score
77. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Personally-identifiable information brings?
<--- Score
78. Is Personally-identifiable information currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
79. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
80. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
81. What gets examined?
<--- Score
82. Is there a Personally-identifiable information management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
83. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
84. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
85. What is the definition of Personally-identifiable information excellence?
<--- Score
86. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Personally-identifiable information goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
87. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
88. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
89. How do you gather Personally-identifiable information requirements?
<--- Score
90. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Personally-identifiable information leverage and how?
<--- Score
91. Is the scope of Personally-identifiable information defined?
<--- Score
92. Do you all define Personally-identifiable information in the same way?
<--- Score
93. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
94. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
95. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
96. Will team members perform Personally-identifiable information work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
97. How are consistent Personally-identifiable information definitions important?
<--- Score
98. Are the Personally-identifiable information requirements complete?
<--- Score
99. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
100. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
101. Do you have a Personally-identifiable information success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
102. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
103. How can the value of Personally-identifiable information be defined?
<--- Score
104. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
105. How do you catch Personally-identifiable information definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
106. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
107. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
108. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
109. Is special Personally-identifiable information user knowledge required?
<--- Score
110. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
111. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
112. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
113. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
114. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
115. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
116. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
117. Have all basic functions of Personally-identifiable information been defined?
<--- Score
118. How does the Personally-identifiable information manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
119. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
120. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
121. What is the context?
<--- Score
122. How would you define Personally-identifiable information leadership?
<--- Score
123. How did the Personally-identifiable information manager receive input to the development of a Personally-identifiable information improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
124. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
125. Is Personally-identifiable information required?
<--- Score
126. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
127. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
128. Is the Personally-identifiable information scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
129. What sources do you use to gather information for a Personally-identifiable information study?
<--- Score
130. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
131. When is/was the Personally-identifiable information start date?
<--- Score
132. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
133. Are accountability and ownership for Personally-identifiable information clearly defined?
<--- Score
134. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
135. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
136. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
137. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
138. What was the context?
<--- Score
139. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
140. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
141. Are the Personally-identifiable information requirements testable?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Personally-identifiable information Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
