Читать книгу Risk Report A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the Risk report tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
2. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
3. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk report changes?
<--- Score
4. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
5. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
6. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
7. Is the Risk report scope manageable?
<--- Score
8. Is the scope of Risk report defined?
<--- Score
9. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
10. Will team members regularly document their Risk report work?
<--- Score
11. Is there a Risk report management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
12. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
13. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
14. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
15. What is the scope of Risk report?
<--- Score
16. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
17. What is in scope?
<--- Score
18. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
19. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
20. Has the Risk report work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
21. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
22. How would you define Risk report leadership?
<--- Score
23. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
24. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
25. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
26. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
27. Will a Risk report production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
28. How can the value of Risk report be defined?
<--- Score
29. How did the Risk report manager receive input to the development of a Risk report improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
30. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
31. Is special Risk report user knowledge required?
<--- Score
32. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
33. How does the Risk report manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
34. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
35. When is/was the Risk report start date?
<--- Score
36. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk report results?
<--- Score
37. Will team members perform Risk report work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
38. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
39. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
40. Who approved the Risk report scope?
<--- Score
41. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
42. What are the Risk report use cases?
<--- Score
43. Is there a clear Risk report case definition?
<--- Score
44. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
45. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
46. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope of the Risk report work?
<--- Score
48. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
49. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
50. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
51. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk report work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
52. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
53. Is Risk report currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
54. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
55. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
56. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
57. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
58. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
59. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
60. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
61. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
62. How do you think the partners involved in Risk report would have defined success?
<--- Score
63. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
64. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
65. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
66. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
67. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
68. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
69. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Risk report?
<--- Score
70. Has a Risk report requirement not been met?
<--- Score
71. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk report study?
<--- Score
72. How do you hand over Risk report context?
<--- Score
73. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
74. Are the Risk report requirements testable?
<--- Score
75. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
76. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
77. Do you all define Risk report in the same way?
<--- Score
78. How do you manage changes in Risk report requirements?
<--- Score
79. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
80. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk report brings?
<--- Score
81. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
82. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
83. What are the core elements of the Risk report business case?
<--- Score
84. What happens if Risk report’s scope changes?
<--- Score
85. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk report? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
86. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk report results are met?
<--- Score
87. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
88. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
89. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
90. What is the scope?
<--- Score
91. What Risk report services do you require?
<--- Score
92. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
93. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
94. What is the context?
<--- Score
95. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
96. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
97. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
98. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
99. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
100. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
101. Is Risk report linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
102. What is the scope of the Risk report effort?
<--- Score
103. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk report leverage and how?
<--- Score
104. What was the context?
<--- Score
105. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
106. What would be the goal or target for a Risk report’s improvement team?
<--- Score
107. Why are you doing Risk report and what is the scope?
<--- Score
108. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
109. Who is gathering Risk report information?
<--- Score
110. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
111. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
112. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
114. What are (control) requirements for Risk report Information?
<--- Score
115. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
116. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk report goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
117. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
118. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
119. How are consistent Risk report definitions important?
<--- Score
120. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
121. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Risk report improvements?
<--- Score
122. How do you manage unclear Risk report requirements?
<--- Score
123. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk report activities?
<--- Score
124. Are improvement team members fully trained on Risk report?
<--- Score
125. What is the definition of Risk report excellence?
<--- Score
126. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
127. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
128. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
129. What Risk report requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
130. How will the Risk report team and the group measure complete success of Risk report?
<--- Score
131. Who are the Risk report improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
132. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
133. Are the Risk report requirements complete?
<--- Score
134. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Risk report Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
