Читать книгу Theory Of Governance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are the Theory of governance requirements testable?
<--- Score
2. What is the scope of the Theory of governance work?
<--- Score
3. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
4. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
5. Do you all define Theory of governance in the same way?
<--- Score
6. What was the context?
<--- Score
7. Have all basic functions of Theory of governance been defined?
<--- Score
8. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
9. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
10. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
11. What Theory of governance requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
12. Will a Theory of governance production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
13. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
14. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
15. How do you catch Theory of governance definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
16. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
17. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
19. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
20. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
21. Is there any additional Theory of governance definition of success?
<--- Score
22. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
23. How will the Theory of governance team and the group measure complete success of Theory of governance?
<--- Score
24. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
25. What is in scope?
<--- Score
26. Are the Theory of governance requirements complete?
<--- Score
27. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
29. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Theory of governance results are met?
<--- Score
30. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
31. Is the Theory of governance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
32. What is the scope of the Theory of governance effort?
<--- Score
33. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Theory of governance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
34. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
35. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
36. How do you manage unclear Theory of governance requirements?
<--- Score
37. What would be the goal or target for a Theory of governance’s improvement team?
<--- Score
38. How can the value of Theory of governance be defined?
<--- Score
39. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
40. Why are you doing Theory of governance and what is the scope?
<--- Score
41. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
42. How do you gather Theory of governance requirements?
<--- Score
43. Is there a critical path to deliver Theory of governance results?
<--- Score
44. How would you define Theory of governance leadership?
<--- Score
45. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
46. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
47. Is the Theory of governance scope manageable?
<--- Score
48. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Theory of governance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
49. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
50. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Theory of governance brings?
<--- Score
51. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
52. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
54. How do you think the partners involved in Theory of governance would have defined success?
<--- Score
55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Theory of governance?
<--- Score
56. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
57. Is Theory of governance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
58. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
59. Who approved the Theory of governance scope?
<--- Score
60. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
61. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
62. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
63. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
64. What sources do you use to gather information for a Theory of governance study?
<--- Score
65. How does the Theory of governance manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
66. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
67. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
68. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
69. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
70. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
72. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
73. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
74. What is the scope?
<--- Score
75. Do you have a Theory of governance success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
76. What happens if Theory of governance’s scope changes?
<--- Score
77. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
78. Is Theory of governance currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
79. Is the scope of Theory of governance defined?
<--- Score
80. Has a Theory of governance requirement not been met?
<--- Score
81. What are the core elements of the Theory of governance business case?
<--- Score
82. How do you hand over Theory of governance context?
<--- Score
83. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
84. What are the Theory of governance use cases?
<--- Score
85. How are consistent Theory of governance definitions important?
<--- Score
86. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Theory of governance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
87. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
88. Is Theory of governance required?
<--- Score
89. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
90. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
91. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
92. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
93. How have you defined all Theory of governance requirements first?
<--- Score
94. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
95. Is there a clear Theory of governance case definition?
<--- Score
96. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
97. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
98. How do you manage changes in Theory of governance requirements?
<--- Score
99. Has the Theory of governance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
100. What gets examined?
<--- Score
101. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
102. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
103. Who is gathering Theory of governance information?
<--- Score
104. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
105. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
107. What is the context?
<--- Score
108. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
109. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
110. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
111. What are (control) requirements for Theory of governance Information?
<--- Score
112. What is the definition of Theory of governance excellence?
<--- Score
113. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
114. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
115. When is/was the Theory of governance start date?
<--- Score
116. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Theory of governance leverage and how?
<--- Score
117. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
118. What Theory of governance services do you require?
<--- Score
119. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
120. What is the scope of Theory of governance?
<--- Score
121. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
122. What are the record-keeping requirements of Theory of governance activities?
<--- Score
123. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
124. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
125. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
126. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
127. What are the Theory of governance tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
128. How did the Theory of governance manager receive input to the development of a Theory of governance improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
129. What system do you use for gathering Theory of governance information?
<--- Score
130. Are accountability and ownership for Theory of governance clearly defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Theory of governance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
