Читать книгу Programmable System On A Chip A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
2. What gets examined?
<--- Score
3. How do you think the partners involved in Programmable system on a chip would have defined success?
<--- Score
4. How are consistent Programmable system on a chip definitions important?
<--- Score
5. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
6. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
7. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
8. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
9. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
10. What are the record-keeping requirements of Programmable system on a chip activities?
<--- Score
11. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
12. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
13. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Programmable system on a chip leverage and how?
<--- Score
14. How do you hand over Programmable system on a chip context?
<--- Score
15. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
16. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
17. Why are you doing Programmable system on a chip and what is the scope?
<--- Score
18. What are the Programmable system on a chip use cases?
<--- Score
19. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
20. How do you catch Programmable system on a chip definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
21. What are the core elements of the Programmable system on a chip business case?
<--- Score
22. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
23. Is there a critical path to deliver Programmable system on a chip results?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather Programmable system on a chip requirements?
<--- Score
25. Are the Programmable system on a chip requirements testable?
<--- Score
26. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
27. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
28. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
29. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Programmable system on a chip? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
30. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
31. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
32. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
33. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
34. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
35. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
36. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
37. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Programmable system on a chip goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
39. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
40. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
41. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Programmable system on a chip results are met?
<--- Score
42. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
43. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
44. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
45. Are improvement team members fully trained on Programmable system on a chip?
<--- Score
46. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
47. Is there any additional Programmable system on a chip definition of success?
<--- Score
48. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
49. What system do you use for gathering Programmable system on a chip information?
<--- Score
50. What would be the goal or target for a Programmable system on a chip’s improvement team?
<--- Score
51. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Programmable system on a chip changes?
<--- Score
52. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
53. What is the definition of Programmable system on a chip excellence?
<--- Score
54. Is the Programmable system on a chip scope manageable?
<--- Score
55. How will the Programmable system on a chip team and the group measure complete success of Programmable system on a chip?
<--- Score
56. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
57. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
58. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
59. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
60. How can the value of Programmable system on a chip be defined?
<--- Score
61. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
62. Is Programmable system on a chip required?
<--- Score
63. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
64. What are (control) requirements for Programmable system on a chip Information?
<--- Score
65. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
66. How did the Programmable system on a chip manager receive input to the development of a Programmable system on a chip improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
67. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
68. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
69. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
70. What Programmable system on a chip services do you require?
<--- Score
71. How does the Programmable system on a chip manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
72. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
74. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
75. How do you manage changes in Programmable system on a chip requirements?
<--- Score
76. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
77. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
80. What sources do you use to gather information for a Programmable system on a chip study?
<--- Score
81. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
82. What is the context?
<--- Score
83. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
84. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
85. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
86. What is the scope of the Programmable system on a chip work?
<--- Score
87. Is Programmable system on a chip linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
88. Is there a clear Programmable system on a chip case definition?
<--- Score
89. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
90. Is the Programmable system on a chip scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
91. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
92. What Programmable system on a chip requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Programmable system on a chip work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
94. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
95. What is the scope of the Programmable system on a chip effort?
<--- Score
96. Is special Programmable system on a chip user knowledge required?
<--- Score
97. Are accountability and ownership for Programmable system on a chip clearly defined?
<--- Score
98. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
99. Will team members perform Programmable system on a chip work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
100. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
101. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
102. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
103. Have all basic functions of Programmable system on a chip been defined?
<--- Score
104. Is Programmable system on a chip currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
105. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
106. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
107. Who are the Programmable system on a chip improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
108. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
109. How have you defined all Programmable system on a chip requirements first?
<--- Score
110. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
111. Has the Programmable system on a chip work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
112. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
113. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
114. Who is gathering Programmable system on a chip information?
<--- Score
115. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Programmable system on a chip brings?
<--- Score
116. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
117. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
118. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
119. How would you define Programmable system on a chip leadership?
<--- Score
120. Is there a Programmable system on a chip management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
121. What are the Programmable system on a chip tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
122. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
123. Has a Programmable system on a chip requirement not been met?
<--- Score
124. Will team members regularly document their Programmable system on a chip work?
<--- Score
125. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
126. Do you have a Programmable system on a chip success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
127. What is the scope of Programmable system on a chip?
<--- Score
128. Is the scope of Programmable system on a chip defined?
<--- Score
129. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Programmable system on a chip?
<--- Score
130. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
131. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
132. When is/was the Programmable system on a chip start date?
<--- Score
133. Are the Programmable system on a chip requirements complete?
<--- Score
134. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
135. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
136. What is in scope?
<--- Score
137. How do you manage unclear Programmable system on a chip requirements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Programmable system on a chip Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
