Читать книгу Control System Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Control system engineering goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
2. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
3. Has a Control system engineering requirement not been met?
<--- Score
4. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
5. How does the Control system engineering manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
6. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
7. What are the record-keeping requirements of Control system engineering activities?
<--- Score
8. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Control system engineering?
<--- Score
9. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
10. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
11. How do you gather Control system engineering requirements?
<--- Score
12. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
13. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
14. What happens if Control system engineering’s scope changes?
<--- Score
15. Is there any additional Control system engineering definition of success?
<--- Score
16. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
17. Do you all define Control system engineering in the same way?
<--- Score
18. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
19. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope of Control system engineering?
<--- Score
21. How did the Control system engineering manager receive input to the development of a Control system engineering improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
22. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
23. How do you catch Control system engineering definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
24. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
25. What are (control) requirements for Control system engineering Information?
<--- Score
26. What Control system engineering requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
27. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
28. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
29. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
30. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
31. How do you hand over Control system engineering context?
<--- Score
32. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
33. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Control system engineering leverage and how?
<--- Score
34. What was the context?
<--- Score
35. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
36. What is the scope of the Control system engineering effort?
<--- Score
37. What would be the goal or target for a Control system engineering’s improvement team?
<--- Score
38. Will a Control system engineering production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
39. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
40. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
41. How are consistent Control system engineering definitions important?
<--- Score
42. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
43. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
44. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
45. Has the Control system engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
46. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
47. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
48. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Control system engineering? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
49. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
50. Is there a clear Control system engineering case definition?
<--- Score
51. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
52. What is the definition of Control system engineering excellence?
<--- Score
53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
54. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
55. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
56. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
57. How have you defined all Control system engineering requirements first?
<--- Score
58. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
59. What sources do you use to gather information for a Control system engineering study?
<--- Score
60. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Control system engineering changes?
<--- Score
61. Is Control system engineering required?
<--- Score
62. How do you manage unclear Control system engineering requirements?
<--- Score
63. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
64. Who approved the Control system engineering scope?
<--- Score
65. What are the Control system engineering tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
66. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
67. Are accountability and ownership for Control system engineering clearly defined?
<--- Score
68. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
69. Is there a critical path to deliver Control system engineering results?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Control system engineering improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
72. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
73. How will the Control system engineering team and the group measure complete success of Control system engineering?
<--- Score
74. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
75. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
76. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
77. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Control system engineering results are met?
<--- Score
78. Is Control system engineering currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
79. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
80. Why are you doing Control system engineering and what is the scope?
<--- Score
81. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
82. Is the scope of Control system engineering defined?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of the Control system engineering work?
<--- Score
84. Have all basic functions of Control system engineering been defined?
<--- Score
85. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
86. Is the Control system engineering scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
87. How can the value of Control system engineering be defined?
<--- Score
88. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
89. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
90. What Control system engineering services do you require?
<--- Score
91. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
92. What are the core elements of the Control system engineering business case?
<--- Score
93. How would you define Control system engineering leadership?
<--- Score
94. What system do you use for gathering Control system engineering information?
<--- Score
95. How do you manage changes in Control system engineering requirements?
<--- Score
96. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
97. Who is gathering Control system engineering information?
<--- Score
98. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Control system engineering brings?
<--- Score
99. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
100. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
101. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
102. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
103. Is the Control system engineering scope manageable?
<--- Score
104. When is/was the Control system engineering start date?
<--- Score
105. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
106. What is in scope?
<--- Score
107. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Control system engineering work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
108. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
109. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
111. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
112. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
113. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
114. Are the Control system engineering requirements testable?
<--- Score
115. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
116. What is the context?
<--- Score
117. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
118. Is special Control system engineering user knowledge required?
<--- Score
119. Do you have a Control system engineering success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
120. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
121. What are the Control system engineering use cases?
<--- Score
122. Is Control system engineering linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
123. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
124. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
125. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
126. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
127. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
128. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
129. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
130. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
131. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
132. What gets examined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Control system engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
