Читать книгу Field Applications Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 7
ОглавлениеCRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. For your Field applications engineering project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
2. Which information does the Field applications engineering business case need to include?
<--- Score
3. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
4. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
5. Consider your own Field applications engineering project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
6. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
7. Did you miss any major Field applications engineering issues?
<--- Score
8. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
9. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
10. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
11. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
12. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
13. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
14. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
15. What does Field applications engineering success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
16. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
17. Who needs to know about Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
18. What situation(s) led to this Field applications engineering Self Assessment?
<--- Score
19. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
20. What are the Field applications engineering resources needed?
<--- Score
21. What Field applications engineering problem should be solved?
<--- Score
22. Do you need to avoid or amend any Field applications engineering activities?
<--- Score
23. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
24. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
25. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
26. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
27. Are there recognized Field applications engineering problems?
<--- Score
28. Think about the people you identified for your Field applications engineering project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
29. What would happen if Field applications engineering weren’t done?
<--- Score
30. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
31. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
32. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
33. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Field applications engineering delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
34. Have you identified your Field applications engineering key performance indicators?
<--- Score
35. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
36. Do you know what you need to know about Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
37. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
38. What is the extent or complexity of the Field applications engineering problem?
<--- Score
39. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Field applications engineering will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
40. Is it needed?
<--- Score
41. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Field applications engineering project?
<--- Score
42. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
43. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
44. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
45. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
46. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
47. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
48. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
49. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
50. Does your organization need more Field applications engineering education?
<--- Score
51. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
52. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
53. Do you recognize Field applications engineering achievements?
<--- Score
54. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
55. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
56. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Field applications engineering? In other words, what are the risks, if Field applications engineering does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
57. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
58. What are the expected benefits of Field applications engineering to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
59. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
60. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
61. What vendors make products that address the Field applications engineering needs?
<--- Score
62. What Field applications engineering capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
63. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
64. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Field applications engineering leader?
<--- Score
65. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
66. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
67. How are the Field applications engineering’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
68. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Field applications engineering team, Field applications engineering itself?
<--- Score
69. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
70. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
71. What are your needs in relation to Field applications engineering skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
72. How do you recognize an Field applications engineering objection?
<--- Score
73. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
74. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
75. How do you assess your Field applications engineering workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
76. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Field applications engineering research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
77. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
78. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Field applications engineering as an effective investment?
<--- Score
79. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
80. Why the need?
<--- Score
81. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
82. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
83. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
84. What is the Field applications engineering problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
85. What information do users need?
<--- Score
86. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
87. What Field applications engineering events should you attend?
<--- Score
88. When a Field applications engineering manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
89. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
90. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
91. What Field applications engineering coordination do you need?
<--- Score
92. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
93. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
94. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
95. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
96. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
97. Who should resolve the Field applications engineering issues?
<--- Score
98. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
99. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
100. Does Field applications engineering create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Field applications engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
