Читать книгу Field Applications Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

Оглавление

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How do you catch Field applications engineering definition inconsistencies?

<--- Score

2. What happens if Field applications engineering’s scope changes?

<--- Score

3. What information should you gather?

<--- Score

4. How would you define Field applications engineering leadership?

<--- Score

5. Is there a critical path to deliver Field applications engineering results?

<--- Score

6. How do you think the partners involved in Field applications engineering would have defined success?

<--- Score

7. Is Field applications engineering currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

8. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

<--- Score

9. Are the Field applications engineering requirements complete?

<--- Score

10. Scope of sensitive information?

<--- Score

11. Are the Field applications engineering requirements testable?

<--- Score

12. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

13. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

14. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

15. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Field applications engineering changes?

<--- Score

16. Is there any additional Field applications engineering definition of success?

<--- Score

17. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

18. What is the scope of Field applications engineering?

<--- Score

19. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

<--- Score

20. What are the core elements of the Field applications engineering business case?

<--- Score

21. What are the record-keeping requirements of Field applications engineering activities?

<--- Score

22. What is the definition of Field applications engineering excellence?

<--- Score

23. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

24. What is in scope?

<--- Score

25. What sources do you use to gather information for a Field applications engineering study?

<--- Score

26. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Field applications engineering leverage and how?

<--- Score

27. How can the value of Field applications engineering be defined?

<--- Score

28. What Field applications engineering services do you require?

<--- Score

29. How do you hand over Field applications engineering context?

<--- Score

30. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

31. What Field applications engineering requirements should be gathered?

<--- Score

32. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

33. What are the requirements for audit information?

<--- Score

34. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

35. Is there a clear Field applications engineering case definition?

<--- Score

36. What sort of initial information to gather?

<--- Score

37. How do you manage scope?

<--- Score

38. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

39. When is/was the Field applications engineering start date?

<--- Score

40. Why are you doing Field applications engineering and what is the scope?

<--- Score

41. What knowledge or experience is required?

<--- Score

42. Does the scope remain the same?

<--- Score

43. How do you build the right business case?

<--- Score

44. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

<--- Score

45. Have all basic functions of Field applications engineering been defined?

<--- Score

46. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

47. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

48. What information do you gather?

<--- Score

49. What is the context?

<--- Score

50. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

<--- Score

51. What is the scope of the Field applications engineering effort?

<--- Score

52. Is the scope of Field applications engineering defined?

<--- Score

53. Who are the Field applications engineering improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

54. Is the Field applications engineering scope manageable?

<--- Score

55. Are accountability and ownership for Field applications engineering clearly defined?

<--- Score

56. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

<--- Score

57. Will a Field applications engineering production readiness review be required?

<--- Score

58. What is the definition of success?

<--- Score

59. How will the Field applications engineering team and the group measure complete success of Field applications engineering?

<--- Score

60. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

61. How have you defined all Field applications engineering requirements first?

<--- Score

62. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

<--- Score

63. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

64. What is the scope?

<--- Score

65. Who approved the Field applications engineering scope?

<--- Score

66. What would be the goal or target for a Field applications engineering’s improvement team?

<--- Score

67. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Field applications engineering brings?

<--- Score

68. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

69. The political context: who holds power?

<--- Score

70. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

71. How does the Field applications engineering manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

72. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

73. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

<--- Score

74. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

75. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

76. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

77. What gets examined?

<--- Score

78. What was the context?

<--- Score

79. Who is gathering Field applications engineering information?

<--- Score

80. Who is gathering information?

<--- Score

81. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

<--- Score

82. What is out-of-scope initially?

<--- Score

83. How do you gather Field applications engineering requirements?

<--- Score

84. What are the Field applications engineering use cases?

<--- Score

85. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Field applications engineering? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

86. What system do you use for gathering Field applications engineering information?

<--- Score

87. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

88. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

89. Is special Field applications engineering user knowledge required?

<--- Score

90. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

91. How did the Field applications engineering manager receive input to the development of a Field applications engineering improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

92. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

93. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Field applications engineering?

<--- Score

94. Do you all define Field applications engineering in the same way?

<--- Score

95. What are the Field applications engineering tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

96. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Field applications engineering work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

97. What is the scope of the Field applications engineering work?

<--- Score

98. What are the tasks and definitions?

<--- Score

99. How do you gather requirements?

<--- Score

100. Are all requirements met?

<--- Score

101. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Field applications engineering results are met?

<--- Score

102. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

103. Has a Field applications engineering requirement not been met?

<--- Score

104. How are consistent Field applications engineering definitions important?

<--- Score

105. Has the Field applications engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

106. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

107. What is out of scope?

<--- Score

108. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

109. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

110. Is scope creep really all bad news?

<--- Score

111. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

<--- Score

112. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

113. How do you gather the stories?

<--- Score

114. Has your scope been defined?

<--- Score

115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Field applications engineering goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

116. Are resources adequate for the scope?

<--- Score

117. What intelligence can you gather?

<--- Score

118. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

<--- Score

119. What are (control) requirements for Field applications engineering Information?

<--- Score

120. How do you manage unclear Field applications engineering requirements?

<--- Score

121. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

<--- Score

122. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

123. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

124. Do you have a Field applications engineering success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

125. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

126. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

127. How and when will the baselines be defined?

<--- Score

128. What is the worst case scenario?

<--- Score

129. Is the Field applications engineering scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

130. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

131. Is Field applications engineering linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

132. How do you manage changes in Field applications engineering requirements?

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Field applications engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Field Applications Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх