Читать книгу Field Applications Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
2. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
3. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
4. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
5. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
6. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
7. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Field applications engineering services/products?
<--- Score
8. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
9. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
10. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
11. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
12. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
13. Are Field applications engineering vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
14. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
15. How do you verify and validate the Field applications engineering data?
<--- Score
16. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
17. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
18. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
19. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
20. Are there competing Field applications engineering priorities?
<--- Score
21. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
22. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
23. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
24. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
25. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
26. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
27. What potential environmental factors impact the Field applications engineering effort?
<--- Score
28. How will you measure your Field applications engineering effectiveness?
<--- Score
29. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
30. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
31. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
32. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
33. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
34. What is the cause of any Field applications engineering gaps?
<--- Score
35. Do you have any cost Field applications engineering limitation requirements?
<--- Score
36. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
37. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
38. What are hidden Field applications engineering quality costs?
<--- Score
39. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
40. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
41. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
42. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
43. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
44. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
45. How do you verify the Field applications engineering requirements quality?
<--- Score
46. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
47. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
48. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
49. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
50. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
51. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
52. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
53. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
54. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
55. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
56. How can a Field applications engineering test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
57. How do your measurements capture actionable Field applications engineering information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
58. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
59. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
60. What are the Field applications engineering investment costs?
<--- Score
61. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
62. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
63. Among the Field applications engineering product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
64. How can you measure Field applications engineering in a systematic way?
<--- Score
65. How frequently do you verify your Field applications engineering strategy?
<--- Score
66. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
67. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
68. Is the cost worth the Field applications engineering effort ?
<--- Score
69. What details are required of the Field applications engineering cost structure?
<--- Score
70. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
71. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
72. How do you verify Field applications engineering completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
73. What are the costs of delaying Field applications engineering action?
<--- Score
74. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
75. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
76. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
77. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
78. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
79. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
80. What are the operational costs after Field applications engineering deployment?
<--- Score
81. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
82. Why a Field applications engineering focus?
<--- Score
83. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
84. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
85. Does the Field applications engineering task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
86. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
87. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
88. Have you included everything in your Field applications engineering cost models?
<--- Score
89. What are the costs?
<--- Score
90. How do you verify if Field applications engineering is built right?
<--- Score
91. What are the Field applications engineering key cost drivers?
<--- Score
92. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
93. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
94. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
95. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
96. How sensitive must the Field applications engineering strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
97. Are missed Field applications engineering opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
98. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
99. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
100. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
101. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
102. How is the value delivered by Field applications engineering being measured?
<--- Score
103. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
104. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
105. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
106. How frequently do you track Field applications engineering measures?
<--- Score
107. The approach of traditional Field applications engineering works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
108. At what cost?
<--- Score
109. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
110. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
111. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
112. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
113. What is your Field applications engineering quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
114. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
115. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
116. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
117. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
118. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
119. What are the current costs of the Field applications engineering process?
<--- Score
120. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
121. Does a Field applications engineering quantification method exist?
<--- Score
122. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
123. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
124. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
125. Are indirect costs charged to the Field applications engineering program?
<--- Score
126. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
127. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
128. Will Field applications engineering have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
