Читать книгу Materials Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
2. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
3. How can a Materials Processing test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
4. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
5. What are the Materials Processing investment costs?
<--- Score
6. Are Materials Processing vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
7. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
8. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
9. What are your key Materials Processing organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
10. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
11. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
12. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
13. How is the value delivered by Materials Processing being measured?
<--- Score
14. How do you verify if Materials Processing is built right?
<--- Score
15. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
16. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
17. What are the Materials Processing key cost drivers?
<--- Score
18. What details are required of the Materials Processing cost structure?
<--- Score
19. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
20. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
21. Do you have any cost Materials Processing limitation requirements?
<--- Score
22. What are the costs?
<--- Score
23. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
24. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
25. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
26. Have you included everything in your Materials Processing cost models?
<--- Score
27. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
28. What are the operational costs after Materials Processing deployment?
<--- Score
29. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
30. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
31. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
32. How can you measure Materials Processing in a systematic way?
<--- Score
33. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
34. How sensitive must the Materials Processing strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
35. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
36. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
37. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
38. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
39. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
40. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
41. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
42. What are the current costs of the Materials Processing process?
<--- Score
43. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
44. What is the total cost related to deploying Materials Processing, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
45. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
46. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
47. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
48. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
49. What potential environmental factors impact the Materials Processing effort?
<--- Score
50. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
51. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
52. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
53. What is your Materials Processing quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
54. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
55. How do you verify Materials Processing completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
56. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
57. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
58. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
59. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
60. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
61. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
62. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
63. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
64. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
65. Among the Materials Processing product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
66. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
67. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
68. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
69. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
70. Why a Materials Processing focus?
<--- Score
71. How frequently do you track Materials Processing measures?
<--- Score
72. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
73. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
74. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
75. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
76. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
77. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
78. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
79. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
80. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
81. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
82. Are indirect costs charged to the Materials Processing program?
<--- Score
83. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
84. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
85. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
86. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
87. How do you verify the Materials Processing requirements quality?
<--- Score
88. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
89. What are the costs of delaying Materials Processing action?
<--- Score
90. How do your measurements capture actionable Materials Processing information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
91. How do you verify and validate the Materials Processing data?
<--- Score
92. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Materials Processing? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
93. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
94. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
95. Does the Materials Processing task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
96. What is the cause of any Materials Processing gaps?
<--- Score
97. Will Materials Processing have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
98. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
99. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
100. Which Materials Processing impacts are significant?
<--- Score
101. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
102. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
103. How do you measure efficient delivery of Materials Processing services?
<--- Score
104. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
105. Are missed Materials Processing opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
106. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
107. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
108. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
109. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
110. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
111. How will you measure your Materials Processing effectiveness?
<--- Score
112. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
113. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
114. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
115. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
116. What is the Materials Processing business impact?
<--- Score
117. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
118. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
119. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
120. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
121. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
122. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
123. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
124. At what cost?
<--- Score
125. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
126. What are hidden Materials Processing quality costs?
<--- Score
127. Are there competing Materials Processing priorities?
<--- Score
128. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
129. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
130. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
131. The approach of traditional Materials Processing works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
132. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
133. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
134. Is the cost worth the Materials Processing effort ?
<--- Score
135. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
136. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
137. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
138. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
139. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
140. Does a Materials Processing quantification method exist?
<--- Score
141. How frequently do you verify your Materials Processing strategy?
<--- Score
142. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Materials Processing Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
