Читать книгу Social Mobility A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
2. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
3. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
4. How would you define Social mobility leadership?
<--- Score
5. Is Social mobility linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
6. When is/was the Social mobility start date?
<--- Score
7. What is the definition of Social mobility excellence?
<--- Score
8. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
9. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
10. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
11. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
12. What is the scope of Social mobility?
<--- Score
13. How have you defined all Social mobility requirements first?
<--- Score
14. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
15. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
16. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Social mobility goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
17. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
18. Why are you doing Social mobility and what is the scope?
<--- Score
19. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
20. What sources do you use to gather information for a Social mobility study?
<--- Score
21. What Social mobility services do you require?
<--- Score
22. How are consistent Social mobility definitions important?
<--- Score
23. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
24. What was the context?
<--- Score
25. What gets examined?
<--- Score
26. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
27. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Social mobility work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
28. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
29. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
30. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
31. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
32. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Social mobility results are met?
<--- Score
33. How did the Social mobility manager receive input to the development of a Social mobility improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
34. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
35. What are the record-keeping requirements of Social mobility activities?
<--- Score
36. Are the Social mobility requirements complete?
<--- Score
37. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Social mobility? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
38. What is in scope?
<--- Score
39. Is there a Social mobility management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
40. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
41. Are accountability and ownership for Social mobility clearly defined?
<--- Score
42. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
43. How do you think the partners involved in Social mobility would have defined success?
<--- Score
44. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
45. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
46. How will the Social mobility team and the group measure complete success of Social mobility?
<--- Score
47. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
48. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
49. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
50. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
51. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
52. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
53. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
54. Is there a clear Social mobility case definition?
<--- Score
55. How do you manage changes in Social mobility requirements?
<--- Score
56. Is there a critical path to deliver Social mobility results?
<--- Score
57. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
58. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
59. How can the value of Social mobility be defined?
<--- Score
60. Is special Social mobility user knowledge required?
<--- Score
61. Has a Social mobility requirement not been met?
<--- Score
62. Are the Social mobility requirements testable?
<--- Score
63. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
64. What would be the goal or target for a Social mobility’s improvement team?
<--- Score
65. What happens if Social mobility’s scope changes?
<--- Score
66. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
67. What are the core elements of the Social mobility business case?
<--- Score
68. Is the Social mobility scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
69. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Social mobility brings?
<--- Score
70. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
71. Do you all define Social mobility in the same way?
<--- Score
72. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
73. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
74. Who are the Social mobility improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
75. What are the Social mobility tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
76. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
77. Who is gathering Social mobility information?
<--- Score
78. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
79. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
80. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
81. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
82. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
83. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of the Social mobility work?
<--- Score
85. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
86. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
87. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
88. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
89. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
90. Do you have a Social mobility success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
91. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
92. Is Social mobility currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
93. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
94. How do you manage unclear Social mobility requirements?
<--- Score
95. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
96. How do you gather Social mobility requirements?
<--- Score
97. Is there any additional Social mobility definition of success?
<--- Score
98. Will a Social mobility production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
99. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
100. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
101. Is the scope of Social mobility defined?
<--- Score
102. How does the Social mobility manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
103. What is the scope of the Social mobility effort?
<--- Score
104. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
105. Who approved the Social mobility scope?
<--- Score
106. What are (control) requirements for Social mobility Information?
<--- Score
107. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
108. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Social mobility?
<--- Score
109. Is Social mobility required?
<--- Score
110. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
112. How do you hand over Social mobility context?
<--- Score
113. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
114. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
115. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
116. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Social mobility changes?
<--- Score
117. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
118. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
119. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
120. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Social mobility leverage and how?
<--- Score
121. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
122. Has the Social mobility work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
123. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
124. What Social mobility requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
125. Have all basic functions of Social mobility been defined?
<--- Score
126. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
127. What system do you use for gathering Social mobility information?
<--- Score
128. Is the Social mobility scope manageable?
<--- Score
129. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
130. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
131. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
132. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
133. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Social mobility Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
