Читать книгу A Companion to Global Gender History - Группа авторов - Страница 55

The January 2017 Women’s March was a pivotal day in the recent history of feminist consciousness. Centered in Washington DC, a city that housed a newly elected, very powerful opponent of women’s self‐determination, it spearheaded the voice of women across the globe. The March placed front‐and‐center the urgency of the demand for gender equality, at home, in the workplace, in the international arena, in the most private of all locales – the bedroom – and the most personal of all considerations – the human body. The tensions that arose over the subsequent two years drew a sharp picture of the divisions. Did the Women’s March signal a possibility of collective action by those who have already taken differences among women as a premise, or did it signal diversity and division so radical among women’s situations, experiences, issues, and perspectives as to foreclose genuine coalitions across racial, cultural, national, and sexual borders? The enormity of difference in women’s experiences is mindboggling – women in New Delhi fighting for legal protection for female sex workers confined by poverty and abandonment, women in East Africa fighting to change early‐marriage customs where girls as young as age four are given over to a husband’s family, women seeking to overturn customs that do damage to the female body, women struggling for economic and reproductive autonomy, for equal pay, educational opportunities, and respect. There is no question that each of us brought to the marches around the world our particular historical legacies and the ongoing consequences of those legacies. In the wake of the euphoria of that day in January the differences among us surfaced into hostilities. Two years later, many of the same women struggled to find common ground. Ironically, the breadth of our grievances brought together thousands of women and men across the globe in defense of women’s rights and gender equality. That spirit of united activism was no illusion. But those same issues and their differing effects brought to the surface divisions along racial, class, sexual, and national lines.

Yet with women everywhere still targeted with violence on the basis of gender, race, sexuality, and class, it seems that theory can ill afford to fragment and divide women. Certainly we are separated by our histories, experiences, privileges, and deprivations, but those who choose may be united in a willingness to transgress the borders that divide us. If feminist theory serves only to pronounce and reify our differences, rather than provide understanding of our different experiences and suggest ways we might form coalitions across the real and unnatural borders of our lives, then we will not break down the walls that history has built to contain us.