Читать книгу Plautus in der Frühen Neuzeit - Группа авторов - Страница 29

9. Conclusion

Оглавление

To sum up, my case remains circumstantial. I doubt the camel FabriciusFabricius, Georg mentions in his 1549 letter is the Vetus, though a palaeographer could change my mind (ch. 6), and I cannot prove it is the Decurtatus (ch. 7), because the Decurtatus contains no notes resembling HassensteinHassenstein, Bohuslaus von’s handwriting, and nothing is written on its untrimmed front, top, or bottom edges. If proof does exist – a shelfmark, say, or a handwritten title – a peek behind its binding might tell us. When I asked the Heidelberg librarian to pull it off and check, however, she politely refused.1

Nevertheless, if the salt road that brought us Plautus did pass through Bohemia, then in these days of increasing interest in provenance, some folks at the Lobkowicz Library might want their book back.

Hactenus en potui; tu nunc succede camelis

curandis, aliquis lector amice, mihi.

Summa: librum Decurtatum decorticet audax,

et Veteri impositas cum veter, ede notas.

Plautus in der Frühen Neuzeit

Подняться наверх