Читать книгу The Handbook of Speech Perception - Группа авторов - Страница 71

SHEILA E. BLUMSTEIN

Brown University, United States

One of the goals of speech research has been to characterize the defining properties of speech and to specify the processes and mechanisms used in speech perception and word recognition. A critical part of this research agenda has been to determine the nature of the representations that are used in perceiving speech and in lexical access. However, there is a lack of consensus in the field about the nature of these representations. This has been largely due to evidence showing tremendous variability in the speech signal: there are differences in vocal tract sizes; there is variability in production even within an individual from one utterance to another; speakers have different accents; contextual factors, including vowel quality and phonetic position, affect the ultimate acoustic output; and speech occurs in a noisy channel. This has led researchers to claim that there is a lack of stability in the mapping from acoustic input to phonetic categories (sound segments) and mapping from phonetic categories to the lexicon (words). In this view, there are no invariant or stable acoustic properties corresponding to the phonetic categories of speech, nor is there a one‐to‐one mapping between the representations of phonetic categories and lexical access. As a result, although there is general consensus that phonetic categories (sound segments) are critical units in perception and production, studies of word recognition generally bypass the mapping from the auditory input to phonetic categories (i.e. phonetic segments), and assume that abstract representations of phonetic categories and phonetic segments have been derived in some unspecified manner from the auditory input.

Nonetheless, there are some who believe that stable speech representations can be derived from the auditory input. However, there is fundamental disagreement among these researchers about the nature of those representations. In one view, the stability is inherent in motor or speech gestures; in the other, the stability is inherent in the acoustic properties of the input.

In this chapter, we will use behavioral, psychoacoustic, and neural evidence to argue that features (properties of phonetic segments) are basic representational units in speech perception and in lexical access. We will also argue that these features are mapped onto phonetic categories of speech (phonetic segments), and subsequently onto lexical representations; that these features are represented in terms of invariant (stable) acoustic properties; and that, rather than being binary (either present or not), feature representations are graded, providing a mapping by degrees from sounds to words and their meanings during lexical access.