Читать книгу The Politics of Incremental Progressivism - Группа авторов - Страница 21

1 Abers, R. (2019). Bureaucratic activism: pursuing environmentalism inside the Brazilian state. Latin American Politics & Society 61 (2): 21–44.

2 Alonso, A. and Mische, A. (2017). Changing repertoires and partisan ambivalence in the new Brazilian protests. Bulletin of Latin American Research 36 (2): 144–159.

3 Andreotti, A. (ed.) (2019). Governare Milano nel nuovo millennio. Bologna: Il Mulino.

4 Arretche, M. (2012). Democracia, federalismo e centralização no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Fiocruz/Ed. FGV.

5 Arretche, M. (ed.) (2018). Paths of Inequality in Brazil – A Half‐Century of Changes. New York: Springer/ Ed. Unesp.

6 Arretche, M., Schlegel, R., and Ferrari, D. (2016). Preferences regarding the vertical distribution of authority in Brazil: on measurement and determinants. Publius 46 (1): 77–102.

7 Auerbach, A. (2016). Clients and communities the political economy of party network organization and development in India's urban slums. World Politics 68 (1): 111–148.

8 Auerbach, A. (2017). Neighborhood associations and the urban poor: India's slum development committees. World Development 96: 119–135.

9 Auyero, J. (2000). The logic of clientelism in Argentina: an ethnographic account. Latin American Research Review 35 (3): 55–81.

10 Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., and Silva, M. (2011). Bootstraping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

11 Banaszak, L. (2010). The Women's Movement Inside and Outside the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12 Bhan, G. (2012). In the Public's Interest. Evictions, Citizenship and Inequality in Contemporary Delhi. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

13 Bussell, J. (2019). Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

14 Caldeira, T. (2000). The City of Walls. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

15  Caldeira, T. (2016). Peripheral urbanization: autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the Global South. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (1): 3–20.

16 Campbell, T. (1997). Innovations and Risk Taking: The Engine of Reform in Local Government in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank Discussion papers.

17 Carmona, R. (2012). El debate sobre nuevos estilos de gobienrno em ciudades argentinas. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciccus.

18 Carrión, F. and Ponce, S. (eds.) (2015). El giro a la izquierda: los gobiernos locales de America Latina. Quito: 5ª avenida Ed.

19 Chaves, D. and Goldfrank, B. (eds.) (2004). La izquierda en la ciudad. Barcelona: Icaria ed.

20 Cleary, M. (2007). Electoral competition, participation, and government responsiveness in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 283–299.

21 Coslovsky, S. (2016). Beyond bureaucracy: how prosecutors and public defenders enforce urban planning laws in São Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (6): 1103–1119.

22 Diamond, L. and Morlino, L. (2004). The quality of democracy: an overview. Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 20–31.

23 Dropp, K. and Peskowitz, Z. (2012). Electoral security and the provision of constituency service. The Journal of Politics 74 (1): 220–234.

24 Einstein, K. and Glick, D. (2018). Mayors, partisanship, and redistribution: evidence directly from U.S. mayors. Urban Affairs Review 54 (1): 74–106.

25 Eulau, H. and Karps, P. (1977). The puzzle of representation: specifying components of responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–254.

26 Evans, P., Rueschmeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) (1985). Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27 Faguet, J.‐P. and Pöschl, C. (2015). Is Decentralization Good for Development? Perspectives from Academics and Policy Makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

28 Fairfield, T. and Garay, C. (2017). Redistribution under the right in Latin America: electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies 50 (14): 1871–1906.

29 Ferman, B. (1985). Governing the Ungovernable City: Political Skill, Leadership and the Modern Mayor. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

30 Figueiredo, A. and Limongi, F. (1999). Executivo e Legislativo na nova ordem constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.

31 Fiorina, M. (1989). Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

32 França, D. (2016). Inequalities and residential segregation by race and class. In: São Paulo in the Twenty‐First Century Spaces, Heterogeneities, Inequalities (ed. E. Marques), 196–213. New York: Routledge.

33 Gilbert, A. (2013). How to help, and how not to help, the poor in the megacities of the south. City 17 (5): 628–635.

34 Gilbert, A. and Gugler, J. (1982). Cities, Poverty, and Development: Urbanization in the Third World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

35  Giraudy, A., Moncada, E., and Snyder, R. (eds.) (2019). Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

36 Goldfrank, B. (2011). Deepening Local Democracy in Latin American: Participation, Decentralization and the Left. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

37 Gordon, I. and Travers, T. (2010). London: planning the ungovernable city. City, Culture and Society 1 (2): 49–55.

38 Gurza Lavalle, A. (2018). Councils, associations, and inequality. In: Paths of Inequality in Brazil – a Half‐Century of Changes (ed. M. Arretche), 25–44. New York: Springer/Ed. Unesp.

39 Gurza Lavalle, A., Carlos, E., Dowbor, M., and Szwako, J. (2019). Movimentos sociais, institucionalização e domínios de agência. In: Movimentos sociais e institucionalização: políticas sociais, raça e gênero no Brasil pós‐transição (eds. A. Gurza Lavalle, E. Carlos, M. Dowbor and J. Szwako), 21–87. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Uerj.

40 Hajnal, Z. and Trounstine, J. (2017). Who or what governs? The effects of economics, politics, institutions, and needs on local spending. American Politics Research 38 (6): 1130–1163.

41 Herrera, V. (2017). From participatory promises to partisan capture: local democratic transitions and Mexican water politics. Comparative Politics 38 (4): 479–499.

42 Holland, A. (2018a). Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

43 Holland, A. (2018b). Diminished expectations: redistributive preferences in truncated welfare states. World Politics 70 (4): 555–594.

44 Holland, A. and Palmer‐Rubin, B. (2015). Beyond the machine: clientelist brokers and interest organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 48 (9): 1186–1223.

45 Holland, A. and Schneider, B. (2017). Easy and hard redistribution: the political economy of welfare states in Latin America. Perspectives in Politics 15 (4): 988–1006.

46 Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society 21 (2): 245–267.

47 Hoyler, T. (2016). Private sector housing developments: who produces what, how and where? In: São Paulo in the Twenty‐First Century: Spaces, Heterogeneities, Inequalities (ed. E. Marques), 214–227. New York: Routledge.

48 Hubber, E. and Stephens, J. (2013). Democracy and the Left. Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

49 Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

50 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE (2020). Aglomerados subnormais 2019. Brasília: IBGE. www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/organizacao‐do‐territorio/tipologias‐do‐territorio/15788‐aglomerados‐subnormais.html (accessed 16 June 2020.

51 Jobert, B. and Muller, P. (1987). L'état en action: politiques publiques et corporatismes. Paris: PUF.

52 John, P. and Cole, A. (2000). When do institutions, policy sectors, and cities matter? Comparing networks of local policy makers in Britain and France. Comparative Political Studies 33 (2): 248–268.

53  Judd, D. (2005). Everything is going to hell: urban scholars as end‐times prophets. Urban Affairs Review 41: 119.

54 Keefer, P. (2005). Democratization and Clientelism: Why Are Young Democracies Badly Governed? Washington, DC: World Bank.

55 Khosa, M. (ed.) (2000). Empowerment through Service Delivery. Pretoria: HSRC Publishers.

56 Kingdom, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

57 Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. (2007). Patrons, Clients, and Policies‐Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

58 Klintowitz, D. (2015). Entre a reforma urbana e a reforma imobiliária: a coordenação de interesses na política habitacional brasileira nos anos 2000. Doctoral dissertation. FGV, University of São Paulo.

59 Kowarick, L. (1979). A espoliação urbana. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

60 Kuschnir, K. (2000). O cotidiano da política. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

61 Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20 (1): 1–21.

62 Lefebvre, C. (2010). Metropolis ingobernables? Experiencias Europeas. Politica y Sociedad 47 (3): 131–143.

63 Le Galès, P. (2011). Urban policies in Europe: what is governed? In: The New Blackwell Companion to the City (eds. G. Bridge and S. Watson), 747–758. Oxford: Blackwel.

64 Le Galès, P. (2020). Rendre la métropole parisienne gouvernable – état, institutions, réseaux. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

65 Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (2011). The Resurgence of the Latin America Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

66 Limongi, F. and Mesquita, L. (2011). Estratégia partidária e clivagens eleitorais: as eleições municipais pós redemocratização. In: São Paulo: novos percursos e atores (eds. L. Kowarick and E. Marques), 207–232. São Paulo: Editora 34.

67 Lopez, T. (1996). Gobiernos municipales en México: entre la modernización y la tradicion política. Tijuana: El Colegio de la frontera norte.

68 Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310.

69 Marques, E. (2003). Redes sociais, instituições e atores políticos no governo da cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo: Annablume.

70 Marques, E. (2012). Public policies, power and social networks in Brazilian urban policies. Latin American Research Review 47 (2): 27–50.

71 Marques, E. (ed.) (2016a). São Paulo in the Twenty‐First Century Spaces, Heterogeneities, Inequalities. New York: Routledge.

72 Marques, E. (2016b). De volta aos capitais para melhor entender as políticas urbanas. Novos Estudos 35 (2): 15–33.

73 Marques, E. (2017). Em busca de um objeto esquecido: a política e as políticas do urbano no brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 32 (95): 1–18.

74  Marques, E. (2019). Transformações, avanços e impasses nas políticas urbanas brasileiras recentes. In: As políticas da política: desigualdades e inclusão nos governos do PSDB e do PT (eds. M. Arretche, E. Marques and C. Faria), 245–268. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp/CEM.

75 McLennan, A. and Munslow, B. (2009). The Politics of Service Delivery. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

76 Meltzer, A. and Richard, S. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–927.

77 Molotch, H. (1976). The City as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. The American Journal of Sociology 82 (2): 309–332.

78 Novaes, L. (2018). Disloyal brokers and weak parties. American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 84–98.

79 Oliveros, V. (2016). Making it personal: clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public administration in Argentina. Comparative Politics 48 (3): 373–391.

80 Paller, J. (2015). Informal networks and access to power to obtain housing in urban slums in Ghana. Africa Today 62 (1): 30–55.

81 Palmer, I., Moodley, N., and Parnell, S. (2017). Building a Capable State: Service Delivery in Post‐Apartheid South Africa. London: Zed books.

82 Pasotti, E. (2010a). Sorting through the trash: the waste management crisis in southern Italy. South European Society and Politics 15 (2): 289–307.

83 Pasotti, E. (2010b). Political Branding in Cities: The Decline of Machine Politics in Bogotá, Naples, and Chicago. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

84 Peterson, P. (1982). The City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

85 Pickvance, C. (2001). Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16: 7–28.

86 Pierre, J. (2011). The Politics of Urban Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

87 Post, A. (2014). Foreign and Domestic Investment in Argentina: The Politics of Privatized Infrastructure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

88 Post, A. (2019). Cities and politics in the developing world. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 115–133.

89 Raco, M., Durrant, D., and Livingstone, N. (2018). Slow cities, urban politics and the temporalities of planning: lessons from London. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (7): 1176–1194.

90 Reddy, V. and Rao, R. (1985). Urban Crisis in India. Hyderabad: Hyderabad Publishers.

91 Rhodes, R. (2007). Understanding governance: ten years on. Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264.

92 Rivadulla, M. (2012). Clientelism or something else? Squatter politics in Montevideo. Latin American Politics and Society 54 (1): 37–63.

93 Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23.

94 Rocha, M. and Silva, B. (2017). O poder de indicar: preferências legislativas de vereadores mineiros. Cadernos Adenauer XVIII (2): 185–208.

95  Rolnik, R. (2009). Democracia no fio da navalha limites e possibilidades para a implementação de uma agenda de reforma urbana no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos 21 (2): 30–50.

96 Roy, A. (2016). Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (1): 200–208.

97 Roy, A. and Al Sayyad, N. (eds.) (2004). Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, South Asia and Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

98 Ruchelman, L. (1969). Big City Mayors: The Crisis in Urban Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

99 Sabatier, P. and Jenkins‐Smith, H. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

100 Santos, W. (1979). Cidadania e justiça. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Campus.

101 Sapotichne, J., Jones, B., and Wolfe, M. (2007). Is urban politics a black hole? Analyzing the boundary between political science and urban politics. Urban Affairs Review 43: 76–92.

102 Scott, A. (2012). A World in Emergence: Cities and Regions in the 21st Century. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar.

103 Scott, A. and Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (1): 1–15.

104 SEADE. (2019). São Paulo 465 anos. São Paulo: Seade. http://www.seade.gov.br/wp‐content/uploads/2019/02/Municipio_Sao_Paulo_.pdf (accessed at 16 June 2020).

105 Sellers, J. (2010). State‐society relations beyond the Weberian state. In: Handbook of Governance (ed. M. Bevir), 124–141. London: Sage.

106 Sellers, J. (2019). From within to between nations: subnational comparison across borders. Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 85–105.

107 Sellers, J. and Kwak, S. (2010). State and society in local governance: lessons from a multilevel comparison. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (3): 620–643.

108 Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

109 Stewart, F. (1950). A Half Century of Municipal Reform. the History of the National Municipal League. Berkeley: University of California Press.

110 Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50: 17–28.

111 Stokes, S., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

112 Stone, C. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs 15 (1): 1–28.

113 Tendler, J. (1997). Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

114  Tilly, C. (1992). Big Structures, Large Processes Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage foundation.

115 Trounstine, J. (2009b). All politics is local: the reemergence of the study of city politics. Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 611–618.

116 Ugalde, V. and Le Galès, P. (eds.) (2018). ¿Que se Gobierna? El caso de la ciudad de México. México, DF: Colegio de México.

117 Vivek, S. (2015). Delivering Public Services Effectively Tamil Nadu and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

118 Weitz‐Shapiro, R. (2014). Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty and Social Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

119 Yates, D. (1977). The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

120 Zunino, H. (2006). Power relations in urban decision‐making: neo‐liberalism, “techno‐politicians” and authoritarian edevelopment in Santiago, Chile. Urban Studies 43 (10): 1825–1846.