Читать книгу Einführung in das Verfassungsrecht der USA - Guy Beaucamp - Страница 33

[1]

Chu/Garvey, S. 10.

[2]

Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 69; Mayer, S. 222.

[3]

Gitterman, S. 145; Chu/Garvey, S. 9; Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 22, 71 u. 79 f.

[4]

Chu/Garvey, S. 9 m.w.N.; ähnliche Zahlen bei Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 59.

[5]

E.O. 10340 (1952).

[6]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 585 f. (1952).

[7]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 ff. (1952).

[8]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 667 ff. (1952).

[9]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 680 u. 702 (1952).

[10]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 681 (1952).

[11]

The Federalist Papers Nr. 70, S. 426: Energy in the executive is a leading character in the definition of good government.

[12]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 682 (1952).

[13]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 683 ff. (1952).

[14]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 701 (1952).

[15]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 587 (1952) (Justice Black).

[16]

Hierzu ausführlich Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 597 ff. (1952) (Justice Frankfurter).

[17]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 587 ff. (1952) (Justice Black).

[18]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 587 f. (1952) (Justice Black).

[19]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 631 f. (1952).

[20]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 635 ff. (1952) (Justice Jackson); s.a. Brugger, S. 73 f.

[21]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 655 (1952) (Justice Jackson).

[22]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 610 f. (1952).

[23]

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579, 511 f. (1952) (Justice Frankfurter).

[24]

Currie, S. 40.

[25]

Barron/Dienes, 8. Aufl., S. 167; Brugger, S. 75; Levinson, S. 107; zweifelnd auch Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 6 u. 29.

[26]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2037 ff.

[27]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2055; ähnlich Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 60 …reluctance to get involved.; Bradley/Morrison, Columbia Law Journal 113 (2013), 1097, 1111 … deference to patterns of governmental practice …

[28]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2056 m.w.N.; Chu/Garvey, S. 10; Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 69.

[29]

Chu/Garvey, S. 10; Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 69; Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2057.

[30]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2056 f. u. 2074; Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 71.

[31]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2060 f.

[32]

E.O. 12.954 (1995).

[33]

Chamber of Commerce v. Reich, 74 F. 3d, 1322, 1339 (1996).

[34]

Rattigan v. Holder, 689 F.3d 764, 769 f. (D.C. Cir. 2012).

[35]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2065.

[36]

Old Dominion Branch v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 273 ff. (1974); Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2071 u. 2076.

[37]

Sea-Land Services v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 738 F. 2d 1311, 1314, (D.C. Cir. 1984).

[38]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2071.

[39]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2066.

[40]

Clinton v. City of New York, 524 US 417, 428, 438 (1998); Slattery/Kloster, S. 1, 3.

[41]

United States v. Windsor, 133 S.Ct. 2675, 2688 (2013).

[42]

Tushnet, S. 81.

[43]

Tushnet, S. 81 f.; s.a. Bradley/Morrison, Columbia Law Journal 113 (2013), 1097, 1107 m.w.N.; A.A. Levinson, S. 45; Amar (2006), S. 179 u. 559, n. 1 für eindeutig verfassungswidrige Gesetze.

[44]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2071 f. u. 2074 m.w.N. aus der Rechtsprechung.

[45]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2079.

[46]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2079.

[47]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2079.

[48]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2077.

[49]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2080 f.

[50]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2081.

[51]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2081 m.w.N.

[52]

Newland, Yale Law Journal 124 (2015), 2026, 2082.

[53]

Mayer, S. 223; als zu weitgehend bewertet dies Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 34; generell zum Machtzuwachs der Exekutive auch Issacharoff, S. 19, 35 ff.

[54]

Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 78 u. 81; Tushnet, S. 179.

[55]

The Federalist Papers Nr. 47, S. 294 f.; Branum, Journal of Legislation 28 (2002), 1, 13 ff. u. 20.

[56]

BVerfGE 125, 175, 223; 133, 112, 132; 139, 19, 45 ff.; 143, 38, 53 f.; s.a. Morlok/Michael, Rn. 343 ff.; Sachs, in: ders., GG, Art. 20, Rn. 113 ff.; Jarass/Pieroth, Art. 20, Rn. 71 ff.; Sodan/Ziekow, § 7, Rn. 25 ff.

[57]

Art. 48 WRV.