Читать книгу Risks and the Anthropocene - Julien Rebotier - Страница 23

Anders, G. (1995). De la bombe et de notre aveuglement face à l’apocalypse. Titanic, Paris.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publishing, London and New York.

Berdoulay, V. (2008). La formation de l’école française de géographie (1870–1914). Éditions du CTHS, Paris.

Bertrand, G. (1968). Paysages et géographie physique globale. RGPSO, 39(3), 249–272.

Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge, London.

Bonneuil, C. (2015). The geological turn. Narratives of the Anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, Hamilton, C., Gemenne, F., Bonneuil, C. (eds). Routledge, London.

Bonneuil, C. and Pestre, D. (2015). Histoire des sciences et des savoirs. Le siècle des technosciences, Volume 3. Le Seuil, Paris.

Bouisset, C., Clarimont, S., Rebotier, J. (2018). Résilience et prévention des désastres (dossier). Vertigo, Special edition 30 [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.19331 [Accessed 6 October 2020].

Bourdieu, P. (1975). La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison. Sociologie et Sociétés, 7(1), 91–118.

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science et réflexivité. Raisons d’agir, Paris.

Braun, B. and Castree, N. (eds) (1998). Remaking Reality. Nature at the Millenium. Routledge, London.

Brondizio, E.S., O’Brien, K., Bai, X., Biermann, F., Steffen, W., Berkhout, F., Cudennec, C., Lemos, M.C., Wolfe, A., Palma-Oliveira, J., Chen, C.-T.A. (2016). Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: A call for collaboration. Global Environmental Change, 39, 318–327.

Brunel, S. and Pitte, J.-R. (2010). Le ciel ne va pas nous tomber sur la tête. JC Lattès, Paris.

Burton, I., Kates, R.W., White, G.F. (1978). The Environment as Hazard. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Castel, R. and Martin, C. (2012). Changements et pensées du changement. La Découverte, Paris.

Castree, N., Adams, W.M., Barry, J., Brockington, D., Büscher, B., Corbera, E., Demeritt, D., Duffy, R., Felt, U., Neves, K., Newell, P., Pellizzoni, L., Rigby, K., Robbins, P., Robin, L., Bird Rose, D., Ross, A., Schlosberg, D., Sörlin, S., West, P., Whitehead, M., Wynne, B. (2014). Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change, 4, 763–768.

Chandler, D., Grove, K., Wakefield, S. (2020). Resilience in the Anthropocene: Governance and Politics at the End of the World. Routledge, London.

Chartier, D. and Rodary, E. (eds) (2016). Manifeste pour une géographie environnementale. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.

Choné, A., Hajek, I., Hamman, P. (2016). Guide des humanités environnementales. Septentrion, Paris.

Clark, N. and Yusoff, K. (2017). Geoscoscial formations and the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3), 3–23.

Crutzen, P.J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(23) [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a [Accessed 8 May 2020].

Crutzen, P.J. (2007). La géologie de l’humanité : l’Anthropocène. Écologie & politique, 34(1), 141–148.

Crutzen, P.J. and Stoermer, E.F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter, 41, 17–18.

Cynorhodon (2020). Dictionnaire critique de l’anthropocène. CNRS Éditions, Paris.

Dahan, A. and Aykut, S. (2015). Gouverner le climat ? Vingt ans de négociations internationales. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.

Davis, H. and Todd, Z. (2017). On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780.

Demeritt, D. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 307–337.

Di Mauro, S. (2015). Postface. In Espace et rapports de domination, Clerval, A., Fleury, A., Weber, S., Rebotier, J. (eds). PUR, Rennes.

Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and Culture: An Essay of the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Dufour, S. (2015). Sur la proposition d’une géographie physique critique. L’Information Géograhique, 79, 8–16.

Dufour, S. and Lespez, L. (2019). Les approches naturalistes en géographie, vers un renouveau réflexif autour de la notion de nature ? BAGF, 96(2), 319–343.

Ekers, M. and Loftus, A. (2012). Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn? Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 234–252.

Ferdinand, M. (2019). Une écologie décoloniale – Penser l’écologie depuis le monde caribéen. Le Seuil, Paris.

Ferry, L. (1992). Le nouvel ordre écologique. Grasset, Paris.

Fressoz, J.-B. and Bonneuil, C. (2015). L’Événement Anthropocène. Le Seuil, Paris.

Gandy, M. (2015). Écologie Queer. Nature, sexualité et hétérotopies. Eterotopia, Paris.

GAR (2015). Réduction de risques de catastrophe : bilan mondial [Online]. Available at: www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/gar-pdf/GAR2015_FR.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2020].

García Acosta, V. and Musset, A. (eds) (2018). Les catastrophes et l’interdisciplinarité. L’Harmattan, Paris.

Gautier, D. and Benjaminsen, T.A. (2012). Environnement, discours et pouvoirs. L’approche political ecology. Quae, Paris.

Gemenne, F., Rankovic, A., Ansart, T., Martin, B., Mitrano, P., Rio, A. (2019). Atlas de l’Anthropocène. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.

Haraway, D. (2016). Anthropocene, capitalocène, plantationocène, chtulucène. Faire des parents. Multitudes, 4(65), 75–81.

Hornborg, A. (2017). Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologist’s approaches to the Anthropocene. Reviews in Anthropology, 46(2–3), 61–77.

Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Keucheyan, R. (2014). La nature est un champ de bataille. Essai d’écologie politique. Zone, Paris.

Kull, C. and Batterbury, S. (2017). La place de l’environnement dans les géographies anglophones et francophones. Émergence, transformations et circulations de la political ecology. In Humanités environnementales. Enquêtes et contreenquêtes, Blanc, G., Demeulenaere, E., Feuerhan, W. (eds). Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris.

Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. La Découverte, Paris.

Latour, B. (2015). Face à Gaïa. La Découverte, Paris.

Latour, B. (2017). Où atterrir ? Comment s’orienter en politique. La Découverte, Paris.

Lavell, A. and Maskrey, A. (2014). The future of disaster risk management. Environmental Hazards, 13(4), 267–280.

Lewis, S. and Maslin, M.A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180.

Lorimer, J. (2017). The Anthroposcene: A guide for the perplexed. Social Studies of Science, 47(1), 117–142.

Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., Vasileiadou, E. (2015). Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32, 211–218.

Lovelock, J. and Margulis, L. (1974). Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. Tellus, 26(1–2), 2–10.

Malm, A. and Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.

Marsh, G.P. (1865). Man and Nature; or Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. C. Scribner, New York.

Maskrey, A. (ed.). (1993). Los desastres no son naturales. La Red, Panama [Online]. Available at: www.desenredando.org/public/libros/1993/ldnsn/LosDesastresNoSonNaturales-1.0.0.pdf [Accessed 8 May 2020].

Mathieu, N. and Jollivet, M. (1989). Du rural à l’environnement. Penser les changements socio-écologiques. L’Harmattan, Paris.

Mercer, J. (2012). Knowledge and disaster risk reduction. In The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction, Wisner, B., Gaillard, J-C., Kelman, I. (eds). Routledge, New York.

Metzger, P. (2017). Connaissances et relations de pouvoir : les sciences sociales, les risques et l’environnement. HDR Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble.

Metzger, P. and Robert, J. (2015). Environnement et risques : les sciences sociales piégées entre critique radicale et utilité sociale. In Espaces et rapports de domination, Clerval, A., Fleury, A., Rebotier, J., Weber, S. (eds). PUR, Rennes.

Moore, J. (2003). Capitalism as world-ecology. Braudel and Marx on environmental history. Organization and Environment, 16(4), 431–458.

Moore, J. (2017a). The Capitalocene part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630.

Moore, J. (2017b). Confronting the popular Anthropocene. Toward an ecology of hope. New Geographies, 9, 186–191.

Moore, J. (2017c). The road to ruin? Making sense of the Anthropocene. IPPR Progressive Review, 24(3), 176–202.

Moore, J. (2018). The Capitalocene part II: Accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(2), 237–279.

Mumford, L. (1950). Technique et civilisation. Le Seuil, Paris.

O’Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L.P., Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7(1), 73–88.

O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K., Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260(5552), 566–567.

Oliver-Smith, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Burton, I., Lavell, A. (2017). The social construction of disaster risks: Seeking root causes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 469–474.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.

Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., Hackmann, H., Holm, P., Ingram, J., Kirman, A., Pardo Buendía, M., Weehuizen, R. (2013). Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science and Policy, 28, 3–13.

Passeron, J.-C. (1995). L’espace mental de l’enquête (I). Enquête, 1, 13–42.

Peet, R. and Watts, M. (1996). Liberation Ecologies. Environment, Development and Social Movements. Routledge, London.

Pelletier, P. (1993). L’imposture écologiste. Reclus, Montpellier.

Pelling, M. (2010). Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation. Routledge, London.

Pigeon, P. and Rebotier, J. (2016). Disaster Prevention Policies. A Challenging and Critical Outlook. ISTE Press, London, and Elsevier, Oxford.

Rebotier, J. (2020). Adaptation. In Dictionnaire critique de l’anthropocène, Cynorhodon (ed.). CNRS Édition, Paris.

Rebotier, J., Pigeon, P., Metzger, P. (2019). Returning social context to seismic risk knowledge & management. Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary research in the city of Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [Online]. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/31787 [Accessed 11 May 2020].

Ribot, J. (2014). Cause and response: Vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), 667–705.

Ribot, J. (2019). Social causality of our common climate crisis: Toward a sociodicy for the Anthropocene. In The Commons in a Glocal World: Global Connections and Local Responses, Haller, T., Breu, T., De Moor, T., Rohr, C., Znoj, H. (eds). Routledge, London.

Robbins, P. (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ.

Robic, M.-C. (ed.) (1992). Du milieu à l’environnement : pratiques et représentations du rapport homme-nature depuis la Renaissance. Economica, Paris.

Robic, M.-C. (ed.) (2006). Couvrir le monde. Un grand XXe siècle de géographie française. ADFP, Paris.

Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E.L., Dynes, R.R. (2007). Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, New York.

Rossi, G. (2001). L’ingérence écologique. CNRS Éditions, Paris. Servigne, P. and Stevens, R. (2015). Comment tout peut s’effondrer. Le Seuil, Paris.

Shaw, R. (2013). Disaster risk reduction and community approaches. In Community Practices for Disaster Risk Reduction in Japan, Shaw, R. (ed.). Springer, Tokyo.

Smith, N. (2010). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space, 3rd edition. University of Georgia Press, Athens, London.

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P.J., McNeill, J.R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614–621.

Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.

Theys, J. and Fabiani, J.-L. (eds) (1987). La société vulnérable. Évaluer et maîtriser les risques. Presses de l’École normale supérieure, Paris.

Tissier, J.-L. (1992). La géographie dans le prisme de l’environnement (1970–1990). In Du milieu à l’environnement : pratiques et représentations du rapport homme-nature depuis la Renaissance, Robic, M.-C. (ed.). Economica, Paris.

Tsing, A. (2017). Le champignon de la fin du monde. La Découverte, Paris.

White, G.F., Kates, R.W., Burton, I. (2001). Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 3(3–4), 81–92.

Wisner, B. (2016). Vulnerability as model, concept, metric and tool. Oxford Research Encyclopedia [Online]. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/naturalhazardscience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389407-e-25 [Accessed 9 May 2020].

Wisner, B. (2019). Disaster studies at 50: Time to wear bifocals? In Disaster Research and the Second Environmental Crisis. Assessing the Challenges Ahead, Kendra, J., Knowles, S.G., Wachtendorf, T. (eds). Springer, Basel.

Wisner, B., Gaillard, J.-C., Kelman, I. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction. Routledge, New York.

Yusoff, K. (2018). A Billion Black Anthropocene. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN [Online]. Available at: https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/a-billionblack-anthropocenes-or-none [Accessed 17 May 2020].

1 1 This introduction has benefited from the proofreadings and comments of Florent Champy, Pascale Metzger, Catherine Meur-Ferec, Alain Musset, Patrick Pigeon and Sébastien Roux. They are warmly thanked. Thanks also to Denise Pumain and Samuel Rufat for their valuable comments on the book as a whole.

2 2 In the English language, however, it is usual to use a capital “A,” which does not prevent some authors from referring to the “Anthropocene” as an ontological moment (Clark and Yusoff 2017, p. 8), a broader conjuncture of ways of thinking, living, and doing the world, in the same way that we understand the Anthropocene moment in this book.

3 3 Not capitalized in the French version of the book.

4 4 In the absence of a “golden spike”, especially in the most remote geological ages, the boundary can be established by scientific consensus on the basis of less definitive stratigraphic evidence.

5 5 As an assemblage of physical and human features involving different spatial scales.