Читать книгу Temporal Psychology and Psychotherapy. The Human Being in Time and Beyond - - Страница 13

«Fonts» of Temporality: Cultural, Professional and Generational Context

In addition to the individual temporal handwriting, there is a level of collective «fonts» of temporality – stable ways of living in time that are formed by culture, profession, generation and social institutions. These «fonts» are like typefaces: some communities prefer a dense, small font of daily routines (industrial workers, state institutions), others – broad calligraphic strokes of creative work (artists, poets), still others – the machine-like, sparse rhythm of digital culture (IT specialists, digital nomads).

Key observations and practical consequences:

– Fonts define people’s expectations about time: what is considered the norm (working at night/day, speed of response, planning horizons).

– They modify temporal handwriting: work habits, family-time rituals, collective celebrations and mourning – all of this shapes, reinforces or suppresses certain trits (1/2/0).

– In therapy it is important not to confuse a cultural font with pathology: rigidity of a «chronological» font is not always a symptom – often it is an adaptation to social roles.

– Fonts change historically: digitalization, urbanization, migration create new combinations of trits and new «typefaces» of temporality.

Practical cheat sheet for the therapist (briefly): when taking a history, include questions about

– work schedule and professional rituals;

– family rhythms (mealtimes, evening rituals, religious holidays);

– technical fueling of time (messengers, notifications, night work);

– generational expectations (future plans, ideas of duty/freedom);

– migration/long breaks (how relocation changed the «font»).

Methodological hint for research: code observations at two levels – individual sequences (trits) and «font» metadata (culture, profession, age). This will allow us to distinguish personal patterns from collective repertoires and to design appropriate interventions.

Be careful with universalization – we should not reduce a person to a «font.» Fonts are a useful metaphor and tool, but primary is individual phenomenology.