Читать книгу The Business of Venture Capital - Mahendra Ramsinghani - Страница 19

1 The Business of Cash and Carry INTRODUCTION: AN OPERATIONAL PRIMER

Оглавление

For Masayoshi Son, raising a $100 billion Softbank Vision fund was easy. As he quips, it was “$45 billion in 45 minutes” — his 45-minute meeting with Saudi Arabia's crown prince kicked off the fund raise. To the prince, Masa offered a gift. “I want to give you a Masa gift, the Tokyo gift, a $1 trillion gift. Here's how I can give you a $1 trillion gift: You invest $100 billion in my fund, I give you a trillion.” Son left the meeting with a commitment of $45 billion, and other investors followed soon thereafter. The world's largest venture fund was off to the races.

But if raising $100 billion was that easy, the doyens of Sand Hill Road venture firms would have done it long ago. For Softbank, the journey started in the year 2000, with a $20 million investment in Alibaba, a startup that would eventually grow into a Chinese e-commerce giant. Alibaba went public in 2014, and at that time, Softbank's 28 percent stake in the company was valued at $58 billion. Son had also invested in Yahoo! in 1996 and reaped its rewards, following the company's IPO four years later. Son's fascination with the world of technology started with the microprocessor. “When I was 17 years old, the very first time I saw a photo of a microprocessor, it made me cry. I was overwhelmed,” he would say. As the waves of innovation rose and fell, the teeny microprocessor spawned into the World Wide Web in the 1990s, followed by the cloud and mobility a decade later. Son kept surfing along and is poised to ride the next trend — be it technological changes like robotics, automation, and artificial intelligence (AI) or societal changes such as ridesharing, vertical farming, and food delivery.

Those who have analyzed his historic investment track record point to the fact that even if you slice off the biggest win — his Alibaba investment — the rest of his portfolio shows above 40 percent internal rate of return (IRR). When the industry average performance is in the mid-teens, having such a significant edge in investment performance helps. Combine that with a boldness of vision and the ability to execute on a global investment strategy and voilà — you have $45 billion in 45 minutes.

The venture capitalist's journey often begins with the ability to raise a venture fund (Exhibit 1.1). The universe of investors in any venture fund includes two broad categories: (a) institutional investors such as pension funds, foundations, university endowments, sovereign wealth funds, business corporations, and (b) high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) and their family offices (see Exhibit 1.2). Institutional investors primarily view venture funds as an asset class, a money-making machine that promises to deliver an annualized “risk-adjusted” IRR.

Exhibit 1.1 Venture capital business model.


Exhibit 1.2 Limited partners.

The VC business model is simple: a venture capitalist, or general partner (GP), knocks on the door of various investors, known as limited partners (LP), to raise a fund. LPs agree to invest in venture funds based on the venture capitalist's background, investment expertise and past performance, a compelling investment strategy, and, to some extent, that mystical X factor — an amalgamation of ability, skills, and luck that defies any logical construct and makes one practitioner more successful than the others.

The two groups — the GP as the investment manager and the LP as the provider of capital — form a 10-year partnership. The LP agrees to pay the GP a management fee each year and a share in a percentage of the profits. In turn, the GP agrees to work night and day to find hot, blazing startups, to invest the capital, turn them into unicorns (billion-dollar valued companies), and harvest the money back in large multiples. The end game for the LP is to make a superior risk-adjusted financial return. The primary measure of success for the venture firm is the IRR and cash-on-cash (C-on-C) return, a multiple of the original investment amount or multiple of invested capital (MOIC). Venture firms and GPs live, and are slaughtered by, these two metrics.

To better understand the economics, take the example of a $100 million fund. The GPs of the fund would invest this capital in, say, about a dozen companies and after building value aspire to “exit” the investments, meaning to sell the ownership. Should these investments generate profits, the investors (or LPs) keep 80 percent of the profits, and the GPs take home 20 percent. The profit, called carried interest or carry, where one-fifth profits were shared, has evolved from the time of Phoenicians, who in the year 1200 CE commanded 20 percent of profits earned from trade and shipping merchandise. In addition to the carry, the LPs also pay the GPs an annual management fee, typically 2 to 2.5 percent of the committed capital per year. Thus, for a $100 million fund with a predetermined life of 10 years, annual fees of 2 percent yield $2 million for the firm. The fees provide for the day-to-day operations of the firm and are used to pay for salaries, travel, operational, and legal expenses. The responsibilities and compensation packages are determined by the professional's responsibilities and experience.

A venture fund is defined as a fixed pool of capital raised for investing per an agreed-upon investment strategy. A venture firm manages this fund, and, over time, a firm can manage multiple funds. The GPs are the primary investment decision makers and are supported by a team of investment and administrative professionals.

To get a venture fund off the ground, several such investors have to be pitched, engaged, convinced, cajoled, and even threatened to commit to a fund. This is often a long, arduous journey for most venture professionals. Fundraising stretches every thread — salesmanship, tenacity, and fortitude. To start with, it's never easy to identify the right target set of investors. It's like searching for a black cat in a dark room — often, the cat does not exist and you can spin around in the dark room. Assuming you can build a target list of fund investors, all the classical challenges of any sales process come into play. Getting in the door, engagement with the decision makers, pushing to a close with not one but at least a dozen or more investors requires special talents. Seldom do investors respond promptly, offer clear feedback on their decision-making criteria, process, and time lines.

Building momentum amongst a group of disparate investors to reach a satisfactory fund size takes as much as 18 months and is often compared to an uphill crawl on broken glass. Attracting, engaging, and assembling a large number of investors is often like a game of house of cards. If one of them pulls out early in the process, a cascading effect can occur. For every fund that makes it to the finish line, at least three die a premature death, littering the venture graveyards with unfulfilled ambitions, ill-timed strategies, and broken partnerships that never got off the ground.

Once the “fund” is subscribed to its target amount, it is closed and no new investors are admitted. The life of such a fund is typically 10 years, during which the venture professionals build a portfolio of companies and aspire to generate returns. The fund is typically dissolved after the tenth year, or when all portfolio investments have been liquidated.

After the fundraising process is complete, venture professionals are under pressure to deploy the capital. During this investment period, startups come in, investors check them out, and the mating dance begins. Pitch decks, term sheets, valuations, and board seats are negotiated as a venture fund builds a portfolio of 20–24 companies within three to five years. A typical portfolio size for any fund can be 10–30 companies, based on the sector and stage of investment.

The Business of Venture Capital

Подняться наверх