Читать книгу Canadian Business Contracts Handbook - Nishan Swais - Страница 18

The word contract traces its roots in the English language to the 14th century. It is derived from a Latin word meaning “to draw together.” That may seem like a trivial point to make, but we must bear in mind that part of our goal is to take the mystery out of writing contracts. By considering the idea that gave birth to the use of the word, we can appeal to our shared understanding of what it means to draw together and use that as the basis for further investigation.

Where persons are involved, to draw together implies — indeed, requires — two or more people. One person alone cannot be drawn together, so the original users of the term contract had in mind a joint effort. They also had in mind a particular action: that of drawing. Contracting isn’t something that happens passively, by coincidence, chance, or fate. It must be actively pursued by the persons involved.

We now know that the original idea behind contracting was that of persons jointly taking active steps to bring themselves together in some respect. This is something we can all clearly grasp, intellectually. We can simply think of instances in our lives where we have taken steps to bring ourselves together with another person, perhaps by buying him or her a birthday present or agreeing to help someone move house. The possibilities are endless, of course. We fill our days with countless examples in which we bring ourselves together with others regarding some matter or another.

Are all of these instances of what the law recognizes as a contract? Before we answer that question, let us return to the notion of drawing together one more time in order to highlight another aspect of contracting.

Note how the original use of the term contract does not say or even imply anything about the way persons must draw themselves together. Specifically, note how the original use of the term contract doesn’t require anything to be necessarily written down. To put it another way, the origin of the term contract is not to draw together in writing. Nor is it to draw together on a piece of paper that has been dated and signed. This is an important point to make because a popular misconception is that a contract must be in writing to be considered a contract.

As you will learn, the law (with very few exceptions relating to interests in real estate, a topic that is beyond the scope of this book) does not require contracts to be in writing. The dated and signed piece of paper you hold in your hands is only evidence of a contract and not the contract itself, just as smoke is evidence of a fire but is not the fire itself. Still, it is the best evidence available and this is a reason why it is important to you, as a businessperson, to learn how to write contracts.

We have begun to demystify the meaning of contract by returning to the idea that gave birth to its use. We now understand that contracting means persons jointly taking active steps to bring themselves together in some respect, which does not have to be in writing (but, for our purposes, should be in writing to better ensure certainty about what is being contracted).