Читать книгу Self Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8

Оглавление

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Is the Self-service scope manageable?

<--- Score

2. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Self-service results are met?

<--- Score

3. What are the core elements of the Self-service business case?

<--- Score

4. What are the Self-service use cases?

<--- Score

5. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

<--- Score

6. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

<--- Score

7. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

8. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

<--- Score

9. Is the Self-service scope complete and appropriately sized?

<--- Score

10. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

<--- Score

11. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

<--- Score

12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

13. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

<--- Score

14. What are the operating system and browser requirements for the SAP Employee Self-Service?

<--- Score

15. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

<--- Score

16. When is the estimated completion date?

<--- Score

17. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

<--- Score

18. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

<--- Score

19. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

<--- Score

20. When is/was the Self-service start date?

<--- Score

21. Do you all define Self-service in the same way?

<--- Score

22. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

<--- Score

23. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

<--- Score

24. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

<--- Score

25. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?

<--- Score

26. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

<--- Score

27. What Self-service services do you require?

<--- Score

28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

<--- Score

29. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

<--- Score

30. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

<--- Score

31. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

<--- Score

32. Are task requirements clearly defined?

<--- Score

33. How did the Self-service manager receive input to the development of a Self-service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

<--- Score

34. Is special Self-service user knowledge required?

<--- Score

35. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

<--- Score

36. How often are the team meetings?

<--- Score

37. What scope to assess?

<--- Score

38. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Self-service?

<--- Score

39. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

<--- Score

40. Are there any self-service requirements?

<--- Score

41. Do you track how self-service uptake is changing the type, duration and skills requirements in the live assistance channel?

<--- Score

42. Who are the Self-service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

<--- Score

43. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Self-service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

<--- Score

44. Are improvement team members fully trained on Self-service?

<--- Score

45. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

<--- Score

46. Are team charters developed?

<--- Score

47. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

<--- Score

48. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

<--- Score

49. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

<--- Score

50. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

<--- Score

51. Do you have a Self-service success story or case study ready to tell and share?

<--- Score

52. Is Self-service currently on schedule according to the plan?

<--- Score

53. Is there a Self-service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

<--- Score

54. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Self-service leverage and how?

<--- Score

55. Have you regarded in which context where self-service is more likely to be used?

<--- Score

56. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Self-service work? How is the team addressing them?

<--- Score

57. What would be the goal or target for a Self-service’s improvement team?

<--- Score

58. Is Self-service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

<--- Score

59. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

<--- Score

60. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Self-service? If so, when did it change and why?

<--- Score

61. How can user involvement, in a self-service technology context, contribute to new ideas?

<--- Score

62. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

<--- Score

63. Does the integration come with self-service capabilities or requires extensive technical training?

<--- Score

64. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

<--- Score

65. Has the Self-service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

<--- Score

66. Will team members perform Self-service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

<--- Score

67. Will team members regularly document their Self-service work?

<--- Score

68. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Self-service improvements?

<--- Score

69. Does the team have regular meetings?

<--- Score

70. What knowledge or experience is required?

<--- Score

71. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

<--- Score

72. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

<--- Score

73. Why are you doing Self-service and what is the scope?

<--- Score

74. How does the Self-service manager ensure against scope creep?

<--- Score

75. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

<--- Score

76. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

<--- Score

77. Who approved the Self-service scope?

<--- Score

78. Is there a critical path to deliver Self-service results?

<--- Score

79. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Self-service brings?

<--- Score

80. How will the Self-service team and the group measure complete success of Self-service?

<--- Score

81. What defines best in class?

<--- Score

82. Are there different segments of customers?

<--- Score

83. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

<--- Score

84. Will a self-service portal be required?

<--- Score

85. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

<--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Self-service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

Self Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition

Подняться наверх