Читать книгу Critical Incident Response Team A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the Critical Incident Response Team investment costs?
<--- Score
2. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
3. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
4. At what cost?
<--- Score
5. What is your Critical Incident Response Team quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
6. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
7. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
8. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
9. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
10. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
11. Are there competing Critical Incident Response Team priorities?
<--- Score
12. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
13. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
14. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
15. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
16. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
17. Are missed Critical Incident Response Team opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
18. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
19. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
20. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
21. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
22. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
23. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
24. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
25. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
26. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
27. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
28. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
29. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
30. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
31. How sensitive must the Critical Incident Response Team strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
32. What are the costs of delaying Critical Incident Response Team action?
<--- Score
33. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
34. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
35. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
36. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Critical Incident Response Team? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
37. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
38. How is the value delivered by Critical Incident Response Team being measured?
<--- Score
39. What are the costs?
<--- Score
40. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
41. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
42. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
43. How can a Critical Incident Response Team test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
44. How do you verify and validate the Critical Incident Response Team data?
<--- Score
45. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
46. Is the cost worth the Critical Incident Response Team effort ?
<--- Score
47. What are the Critical Incident Response Team key cost drivers?
<--- Score
48. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
49. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
50. What is the cause of any Critical Incident Response Team gaps?
<--- Score
51. How will you measure your Critical Incident Response Team effectiveness?
<--- Score
52. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
53. How do you verify Critical Incident Response Team completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
54. The approach of traditional Critical Incident Response Team works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
55. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
56. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
57. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
58. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
59. What are the operational costs after Critical Incident Response Team deployment?
<--- Score
60. What are your key Critical Incident Response Team organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
61. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
62. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
63. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
64. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
65. Which Critical Incident Response Team impacts are significant?
<--- Score
66. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
67. What are the current costs of the Critical Incident Response Team process?
<--- Score
68. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
69. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
70. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
71. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
72. Does the Critical Incident Response Team task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
73. What is the Critical Incident Response Team business impact?
<--- Score
74. What details are required of the Critical Incident Response Team cost structure?
<--- Score
75. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
76. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
77. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
78. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
79. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
80. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
81. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
82. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
83. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
84. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
85. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
86. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
87. How frequently do you verify your Critical Incident Response Team strategy?
<--- Score
88. Are the Critical Incident Response Team benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
89. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
90. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
91. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
92. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
93. How do you verify if Critical Incident Response Team is built right?
<--- Score
94. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
95. How can you measure Critical Incident Response Team in a systematic way?
<--- Score
96. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
97. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
98. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
99. Among the Critical Incident Response Team product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
100. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
101. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
102. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
103. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
104. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
105. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
106. How do your measurements capture actionable Critical Incident Response Team information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
107. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
108. Does a Critical Incident Response Team quantification method exist?
<--- Score
109. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
110. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
111. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
112. Are Critical Incident Response Team vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
113. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
114. How do you measure efficient delivery of Critical Incident Response Team services?
<--- Score
115. What potential environmental factors impact the Critical Incident Response Team effort?
<--- Score
116. Will Critical Incident Response Team have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
117. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
118. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
119. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
120. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
121. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
122. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
123. How do you verify the Critical Incident Response Team requirements quality?
<--- Score
124. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
125. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
