Читать книгу River Restoration - Группа авторов - Страница 38

References

1 Åberg, E.U. and Tapsell, S. (2013). Revisiting the River Skerne: the long‐term social benefits of river rehabilitation. Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 94–103.
2 Acuña, V., Díez, J.R., Flores, L., et al. (2013). Does it make economic sense to restore rivers for their ecosystem services? Journal of Applied Ecology 50(4): 988–997.
3 Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., and Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(3): 271–292.
4 Akron, A., Ghermandi, A., Dayan, T., et al. (2017). Interbasin water transfer for the rehabilitation of a transboundary Mediterranean stream: an economic analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 202: 276–286.
5 Alam, K. (2008). Cost–benefit analysis of restoring Buriganga River, Bangladesh. International Journal of Water Resources Development 24(4): 593–607.
6 Alam, K. (2011). Public attitudes toward restoration of impaired river ecosystems: does residents’ attachment to place matter? Urban Ecosystems 14(4): 635–653.
7 An, D.W. and Lee, J.Y. (2019). Influence and sustainability of the concept of landscape seen in Cheonggye stream and Suseongdong Valley restoration projects. Sustainability 11(4): 1126.
8 Aronson, J., Clewell, A.F., Blignaut, J.N., et al. (2006). Ecological restoration: a new frontier for nature conservation and economics. Journal for Nature Conservation 14: 135–139.
9 Axelrad, G. and Feinerman, E. (2009). Regional planning of wastewater reuse for irrigation and river rehabilitation. Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(1): 105–131.
10 Bae, H. (2011). Urban stream restoration in Korea: design considerations and residents’ willingness to pay. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10(2): 119–126.
11 Baker, S. and Eckerberg, K. (2013). A policy analysis perspective on ecological restoration. Ecology and Society 18(2): 17.
12 Baker, S., Eckerberg, K., and Zachrisson, A. (2014). Political science and ecological restoration. Environmental Politics 23(3): 509–524.
13 Barendregt, A., Stam, S.M.E., and Wassen, M.J. (1992). Restoration of fen ecosystems in the Vecht River plain: cost–benefit analysis of hydrological alternatives. Hydrobiologia 233(1–3): 247–259.
14 Bark, R.H., Robinson, C.J., and Flessa, K.W. (2016). Tracking cultural ecosystem services: water chasing the Colorado River restoration pulse flow. Ecological Economics 127: 165–172.
15 Barthélémy, C. and Armani, G. (2015). A comparison of social processes at three sites of the French Rhône River subjected to ecological restoration. Freshwater Biology 60(6): 1208–1220.
16 Bash, J.S. and Ryan, C.M. (2002). Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29(6): 877–885.
17 Becker, N., Helgeson, J., and Katz, D. (2014). Once there was a river: a benefit–cost analysis of rehabilitation of the Jordan River. Regional Environmental Change 14(4): 1303–1314.
18 Becker, N. and Friedler, E. (2013). Integrated hydro‐economic assessment of restoration of the Alexander‐Zeimar River (Israel–Palestinian Authority). Regional Environmental Change 13(1): 103–114.
19 Becker, N., Greenfeld, A., and Zemah Shamir, S. (2019). Cost–benefit analysis of full and partial river restoration: the Kishon River in Israel. International Journal of Water Resources Development 35(5): 871–890.
20 Benjaminsen, T. A. and Svarstad, H. (2019). Political ecology. In: Encyclopedia of Ecology (ed. B.D. Fath), 391–396, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21 Bennett, S.J., Simon, A., Castro, J.M., et al. (2011). The evolving science of stream restoration. In: Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses, and Tools (eds A. Simon, S.J. Bennett, and J.M. Castro), 1–8. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union.
22 Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.
23 Bergstrom, J.C. and Loomis, J.B. (2017). Economic valuation of river restoration: an analysis of the valuation literature and its uses in decision‐making. Water Resources and Economics 17: 9–19.
24 Bernhardt, E.S. and Palmer, M.A. (2007). Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology 52(4): 738–751.
25 Bernhardt, E.S., Palmer, M.A., Allan, J.D., et al. (2005). Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636–637.
26 Bernhardt, E.S., Sudduth, E.B., Palmer, M.A., et al. (2007). Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15(3): 482–493.
27 Bickman, L. and Rog, D.J. (eds) (2009). The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28 Blanc, G., Demeulenaere, E., and Feuerhahn, W. (2017). Humanités environnementales. Enquêtes et contre‐enquêtes. Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne.
29 Bliem, M., Getzner, M., and Rodiga‐Laßnig, P. (2012). Temporal stability of individual preferences for river restoration in Austria using a choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management 103: 65–73.
30 Boon, P.J., Calow, P., and Petts, G.E. (eds) (1992). River Conservation and Management. Chichester: Wiley.
31 Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L., Swait, J., et al. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18(3): 243–253.
32 Bradshaw, A.D. (2002). Introduction and philosophy. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Principles of Restoration (eds M.R. Perrow and A.J. Davy), 3–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33 Brooks, S.S. and Lake, P.S. (2007). River restoration in Victoria, Australia: change is in the wind, and none too soon. Restoration Ecology 15(3): 584–591.
34 Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., et al. (2016). Valuation and transferability of the non‐market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering 87: 20–29.
35 Brouwer, R. and Sheremet, O. (2017). The economic value of river restoration. Water Resources and Economics 17: 1–8.
36 Buijs, A.E. (2009). Public support for river restoration: a mixed‐method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. Journal of Environmental Management 90(8): 2680–2689.
37 Cairns Jr, J. (1995). Ecosocietal restoration reestablishing humanity’s relationship with natural systems. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 37(5): 4–33.
38 Carah, J.K., Blencowe, C.C., Wright, D.W., et al. (2014). Low‐cost restoration techniques for rapidly increasing wood cover in coastal coho salmon streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 34(5): 1003–1013.
39 Cardinale, B.J., Duffy, J.E., Gonzalez, A., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67.
40 Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D., et al. (eds) (2016). A Companion to Environmental Geography. Chichester: Wiley.
41 Che, Y., Yang, K., Chen, T., et al. (2012). Assessing a riverfront rehabilitation project using the comprehensive index of public accessibility. Ecological Engineering 40: 80–87.
42 Chen, W.Y. (2017). Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: a hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 170–179.
43 Chen, W.Y. and Cho, F.H.T. (2019). Environmental information disclosure and societal preferences for urban river restoration: latent class modelling of a discrete‐choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production 231: 1294–1306.
44 Chen, W.Y., Liekens, I., and Broekx, S. (2017). Identifying societal preferences for river restoration in a densely populated urban environment: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in central Brussels. Environmental Management 60(2): 263–279.
45 Chen, X., Wang, D., Tian, F., et al. (2016). From channelization to restoration: sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida. Water Resources Research 52(2): 1227–1244.
46 Cheng, B., Li, H., Yue, S., et al. (2019). Compensation for agricultural economic losses caused by restoration of healthy eco‐hydrological sequences of rivers. Water 11(6): 1155.
47 Chin, A., Daniels, M.D., Urban, M.A., et al. (2008). Perceptions of wood in rivers and challenges for stream restoration in the United States. Environmental Management 41(6): 893–903.
48 Choi, Y.D. (2007). Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15(2): 351–353.
49 Chou, R.J. (2016). Achieving successful river restoration in dense urban areas: lessons from Taiwan. Sustainability 8(11): 1159.
50 Clewell, A.F. and Aronson, J. (2006). Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20(2): 420–428.
51 Clewell, A.F. and Aronson, J. (2013). Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. Washington DC: Island Press.
52 Connelly, N.A., Knuth, B.A., and Kay, D.L. (2002). Public support for ecosystem restoration in the Hudson River Valley, USA. Environmental Management 29(4): 467–476.
53 Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253–260.
54 Crutzen P.J., Stoermer E.F. (2000). The “Anthropocene.” IGPB Newsletter 41: 17–18.
55 Daily, G.C. (1997). Nature’s Services: Volume 3. Washington DC: Island Press.
56 Davenport, M.A., Bridges, C.A., Mangun, J.C., et al. (2010). Building local community commitment to wetlands restoration: a case study of the Cache River wetlands in southern Illinois, USA. Environmental Management 45(4): 711–722.
57 Davis, M.A. and Slobodkin, L.B. (2004). The science and values of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 12(1): 1–3.
58 Deffner, J. and Haase, P. (2018). The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society 23(4): 35.
59 Depraz, S. (2005). Le concept d’«Akzeptanz» et son utilité en géographie sociale. L’Espace Géographique 34(1): 1–16.
60 Downs, P.W. and Kondolf, G.M. (2002). Post‐project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29(4): 477–496.
61 Downs, P.W. and Thorne, C.R. (2000). Rehabilitation of a lowland river: reconciling flood defence with habitat diversity and geomorphological sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management 58(4): 249–268.
62 Doyle, M.W., Singh, J., Lave, R., et al. (2015). The morphology of streams restored for market and nonmarket purposes: insights from a mixed natural‐social science approach. Water Resources Research 51(7): 5603–5622.
63 Drouineau, H., Carter, C., Rambonilaza, M., et al. (2018). River continuity restoration and diadromous fishes: much more than an ecological issue. Environmental Management 61(4): 671–686.
64 Druschke, C.G., Lundberg, E., Drapier, L., et al. (2017). Centring fish agency in coastal dam removal and river restoration. Water Alternatives 10(3): 724–743.
65 Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., et al. (2005). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163–182.
66 Dufour, S. and Piégay, H. (2009). From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications 25(5): 568–581.
67 Dunlap, R.E., Buttel, F.H., Dickens, P., et al. (eds) (2002). Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
68 Eden, S. and Tunstall, S. (2006). Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science–policy nexus in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24(5): 661–680.
69 Eden, S., Tunstall, S., and Tapsell, S. (2000). Translating nature: river restoration as nature‐culture. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 257–273.
70 Edwards, P.M., Shaloum, G., and Bedell, D. (2018). A unique role for citizen science in ecological restoration: a case study in streams. Restoration Ecology 26(1): 29–35.
71 Elliot, R. (1982). Faking nature. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25(1): 81–93.
72 Emmett, R.S. and Nye, D.E. (2017). The Environmental Humanities: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73 Feng, Q., Miao, Z., Li, Z., et al. (2015). Public perception of an ecological rehabilitation project in inland river basins in northern China: success or failure. Environmental Research 139: 20–30.
74 Fox, C.A., Magilligan, F.J., and Sneddon, C.S. (2016). “You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me”: dam removal and the environmental politics of river restoration. Geoforum 70: 93–104.
75 Fox, C.A., Reo, N.J., Turner, D.A., et al. (2017). “The river is us; the river is in our veins”: re‐defining river restoration in three Indigenous communities. Sustainability Science 12(4): 521–533.
76 Francis, R.A. (2014). Urban rivers: novel ecosystems, new challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 1(1): 19–29.
77 Gallie, W.B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: New Series 56: 167–198.
78 Garcia, X., Corominas, L., Pargament, D., et al. (2016). Is river rehabilitation economically viable in water‐scarce basins? Environmental Science & Policy 61: 154–164.
79 Gerlak, A.K., Eden, S., Megdal, S., et al. (2009). Restoration and river management in the arid Southwestern USA: exploring project design trends and features. Water Policy 11(4): 461–480.
80 Gerner, N.V., Nafo, I., Winking, C., et al. (2018). Large‐scale river restoration pays off: a case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosystem Services 30: 327–338.
81 Gideon, L. (2012). Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. New York: Springer.
82 Gifford, R. and Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. In: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (ed. S.D. Clayton). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83 Gobster, P.H. and Hull, R.B. (eds) (2000). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington DC: Island Press.
84 Gobster, P.H., Nassauer, J.I., Daniel, T.C., et al. (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22(7): 959–972.
85 Golet, G.H., Roberts, M.D., Larsen, E.W., et al. (2006). Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacramento River project, California. Environmental Management 37(6): 862–879.
86 Gómez, C.M., Pérez‐Blanco, C.D., and Batalla, R.J. (2014). Tradeoffs in river restoration: flushing flows vs. hydropower generation in the Lower Ebro River, Spain. Journal of Hydrology 518: 130–139.
87 Gore, J.A. (1985). Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann.
88 Grizzetti, B., Pistocchi, A., Liquete, C., et al. (2017). Human pressures and ecological status of European rivers. Scientific Reports 7: 205.
89 Grossmann, M. (2012). Economic value of the nutrient retention function of restored floodplain wetlands in the Elbe River basin. Ecological Economics 83: 108–117.
90 Guerrin, J. (2015). A floodplain restoration project on the River Rhône (France): analyzing challenges to its implementation. Regional Environmental Change 15(3): 559–568.
91 Haines‐Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well‐being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 1: 110–139.
92 Hannigan, J. (2006). Environmental Sociology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
93 Haque, A.K.E., Faisal, I., and Bayes, A. (1997). Welfare costs of environmental pollution from the tanning industry in Dhaka: an EIA study. Paper presented at the Mid‐term Review Workshop in Yogyakarta, Indonesia (3–8 September 1997).
94 Hausman, D.M. (2011). Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95 Heise, U.K., Christensen, J., and Niemann, M. (eds) (2017). The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
96 Heldt, S., Budryte, P., Ingensiep, H.W., et al. (2016). Social pitfalls for river restoration: how public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance. Environmental Earth Sciences 75(13): 1053.
97 Hidalgo, M.C. and Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3): 273–281.
98 Hill, M.R., McMaster, D.G., Harrison, T., et al. (2011). A reverse auction for wetland restoration in the Assiniboine River Watershed, Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(2): 245–258.
99 Holmes, N.T. and Nielsen, M.B. (1998). Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: a joint Danish and British EU‐LIFE demonstration project, I: setting up and delivery of the project. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8(1): 185–196.
100 Honey‐Rosés, J., Acuña, V., Bardina, M., et al. (2013). Examining the demand for ecosystem services: the value of stream restoration for drinking water treatment managers in the Llobregat river, Spain. Ecological Economics 90: 196–205.
101 Hong, C. and Chun, H. (2018). Barriers, challenges, conflicts, and facilitators in environmental decision‐making: a case of An’Yang Stream restoration. River Research and Applications 34(5): 472–480.
102 Hong, C.Y., Chang, H., and Chung, E.S. (2019). Comparing the functional recognition of aesthetics, hydrology, and quality in urban stream restoration through the framework of environmental perception. River Research and Applications 35(6): 543–552.
103 Hull, R.B. and Robertson, D.P. (2000). Which nature? In: Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eds P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull), 299–307. Washington DC: Island Press.
104 IPBES (Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) (2020). Ecosystem services: glossary. https://ipbes.net/glossary/ecosystem‐services (accessed 8 December 2020).
105 Jähnig, S.C., Lorenz, A.W., Hering, D., et al. (2011). River restoration success: a question of perception. Ecological Applications 21(6): 2007–2015.
106 Januchowski‐Hartley, S.R., Moon, K., Stoeckl, N., et al. (2012). Social factors and private benefits influence landholders’ riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 110: 20–26.
107 Jia, H., Dong, N., and Ma, H. (2010). Evaluation of aquatic rehabilitation technologies for polluted urban rivers and the case study of the Foshan Channel. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China 4(2): 213–220.
108 Jordan, W.R., III (2000). Restoration, community, and wilderness. In: Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eds P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull), 23–36. Washington DC: Island Press.
109 Junker, B. and Buchecker, M. (2008). Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape and Urban Planning 85(3–4): 141–154.
110 Junker, B., Buchecker, M., and Müller‐Böker, U. (2007). Objectives of public participation: which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Water Resources Research 43(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005584.
111 Kail, J., Hering, D., Muhar, S., et al. (2007). The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. Journal of Applied Ecology 44(6): 1145–1155.
112 Kaiser, F.G., Wölfing, S., and Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19(1): 1–19.
113 Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior 19(1): 3–32.
114 Kendy, E., Aylward, B., Ziemer, L.S., et al. (2018). Water transactions for streamflow restoration, water supply reliability, and rural economic vitality in the western United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 54(2): 487–504.
115 Kenney, M.A., Wilcock, P.R., Hobbs, B.F., et al. (2012). Is urban stream restoration worth it? Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48(3): 603–615.
116 Kern, K. (1992). Rehabilitation of streams in south‐west Germany. In: River Conservation and Management (eds P.J. Boon and P. Calow, G.E. Petts), 321–335. Chichester: Wiley.
117 Kim, J.H., Kim, H.J., and Yoo, S.H. (2018). A cost–benefit analysis of restoring the ecological integrity of Jeonju Stream, Korea. Water and Environment Journal 32(3): 476–480.
118 Kim, M., Gim, T.H.T., and Sung, J.S. (2017). Applying the concept of perceived restoration to the case of Cheonggyecheon Stream Park in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability 9(8): 1368.
119 Kondolf, G.M. (2000). Process vs form in restoration of rivers and streams. Annual Meeting Proceedings of the American Society of Landscape Architects. Washington DC: American Society of Landscape Architects.
120 Kristensen, E.A., Baattrup‐Pedersen, A., Jensen, P.N., et al. (2012). Selection, implementation and cost of restorations in lowland streams: a basis for identifying restoration priorities. Environmental Science & Policy 23: 1–11.
121 Lamouroux, N., Gore, J.A., Lepori, F., et al. (2015). The ecological restoration of large rivers needs science‐based, predictive tools meeting public expectations: an overview of the Rhône project. Freshwater Biology 60(6): 1069–1084.
122 Langhans, S.D., Hermoso, V., Linke, S., et al. (2014). Cost‐effective river rehabilitation planning: optimizing for morphological benefits at large spatial scales. Journal of Environmental Management 132: 296–303.
123 Larned, S.T., Suren, A.M., Flanagan, M., et al. (2006). Macrophytes in urban stream rehabilitation: establishment, ecological effects, and public perception. Restoration Ecology 14(3): 429–440.
124 Lave, R. (2016). Stream restoration and the surprisingly social dynamics of science. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 3(1): 75–81.
125 Lave, R., Doyle, M., and Robertson, M. (2010). Privatizing stream restoration in the US. Social Studies of Science 40(5): 677–703.
126 Lave, R., Wilson, M.W., Barron, E., et al. (2014). Critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer 58(1): 1–10.
127 Lebart, L., Salem, A., and Berry, L. (1998). Exploring Textual Data. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
128 Lee, J.S. (2012). Measuring the economic benefits of the Youngsan River Restoration Project in Kwangju, Korea, using contingent valuation. Water International 37(7): 859–870.
129 Lee, M. and Jung, I. (2016). Assessment of an urban stream restoration project by cost–benefit analysis: the case of Cheonggyecheon stream in Seoul, South Korea. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20(1): 152–162.
130 Lee, S. and Choi, G.W. (2012). Governance in a river restoration project in South Korea: the case of Incheon. Water Resources Management 26(5): 1165–1182.
131 Le Floc’h, É. and Aronson, J. (1995). Ecologie de la restauration: définition de quelques concepts de base. Natures Sciences Sociétés 3: 29–35.
132 Lester, J.P. (ed.) (1995). Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence. Durham: Duke University Press.
133 Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(3): 207–230.
134 Lewis, L.Y. and Landry, C.E. (2017). River restoration and hedonic property value analyses: guidance for effective benefit transfer. Water Resources and Economics 17: 20–31.
135 Light, A. and Higgs, E.S. (1996). The politics of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics 18(3): 227–247.
136 Logar, I., Brouwer, R., and Paillex, A. (2019). Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 232: 1075–1085.
137 Loomis, J. (1996). Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: results of a contingent valuation survey. Water Resources Research 32(2): 441–447.
138 Loomis, J. (2002). Quantifying recreation use values from removing dams and restoring free‐flowing rivers: a contingent behavior travel cost demand model for the Lower Snake River. Water Resources Research 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000136.
139 Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., et al. (2000). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33(1): 103–117.
140 Mansourian, S. (2017). Governance and restoration. In: Routledge Handbook of Ecological and Environmental Restoration (eds S. Allison and S. Murphy), 401–413. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
141 Martin, D.M. (2017). Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty‐first century. Restoration Ecology 25(5): 668–673.
142 McCormick, A., Fisher, K., and Brierley, G. (2015). Quantitative assessment of the relationships among ecological, morphological and aesthetic values in a river rehabilitation initiative. Journal of Environmental Management 153: 60–67.
143 McIver, J. and Starr, L. (2001). Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: passive vs. active approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 153(1–3): 15–28.
144 MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well‐being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
145 Mingers, J. and Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research 246(1): 1–19.
146 Mitsch, W.J. (2012). What is ecological engineering? Ecological Engineering 45: 5–12.
147 Morandi, B., Kail, J., Toedter, A., et al. (2017). Diverse approaches to implement and monitor river restoration: a comparative perspective in France and Germany. Environmental Management 60(5): 931–946.
148 Moscovici, S. (2001). Social Representations: Essays in Social Psychology. New York: NYU Press.
149 Nakamura K., Tockner, K., and Amano, K. (2006). River and wetland restoration: lessons from Japan. Bioscience 56(5): 419–429.
150 Nassauer, J.I. (1992). The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology 6(4): 239–250.
151 Netusil, N.R., Jarrad, M., and Moeltner, K. (2019). Research note: the effect of stream restoration project attributes on property sale prices. Landscape and Urban Planning 185: 158–162.
152 Normile, D. (2010). Restoration or devastation? Science 327(5973): 1568–1570.
153 NRC (National Research Council) (1992). Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
154 OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2015). Frascati Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development: The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012‐en.
155 Ormerod, S.J. (2004). A golden age of river restoration science? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14(6): 543–549.
156 Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2006). The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 11(1): 10.
157 Palmer, M.A. and Allan, J.D. (2006). Restoring rivers. Issues in Science and Technology 22(2): 40–48.
158 Palmer, M.A. and Bernhardt, E.S. (2006). Hydroecology and river restoration: ripe for research and synthesis. Water Resources Research 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004354.
159 Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., Allan, J.D., et al. (2005). Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208–217.
160 Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., Chornesky, E., et al. (2004). Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304: 1251–1252.
161 Palmer, M.A., Hondula, K.L., and Koch, B.J. (2014). Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: shifting strategies and shifting goals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45: 247–269.
162 Palmer, M.A., Menninger, H.L., and Bernhardt, E.S. (2010). River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55: 205–222.
163 Perni, Á., Martínez‐Paz, J., and Martínez‐Carrasco, F. (2012). Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: the Segura River, Spain. Water and Environment Journal 26(2): 274–284.
164 Piégay, H., Gregory, K.J., Bondarev, V., et al. (2005). Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in rivers for restoration purposes. Environmental Management 36(5): 665–674.
165 Polizzi, C., Simonetto, M., Barausse, A., et al. (2015). Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 14: 158–169.
166 Purcell, A.H., Friedrich, C., and Resh, V.H. (2002). An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in northern California. Restoration Ecology 10(4): 685–694.
167 Randall, A. (1987). Total economic value as a basis for policy. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116(3): 325–335.
168 Redman, C.L., Grove, J.M., and Kuby, L.H. (2004). Integrating social science into the Long‐Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2): 161–171.
169 Roni, P. and Beechie, T. (2013). Introduction to restoration: key steps for designing effective programs and projects. In: Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Riverine Processes and Habitats (eds P. Roni and T. Beechie), 1–11. Chichester: Wiley.
170 Saarinen, T.F. and Sell, J.L. (1980). Environmental perception. Progress in Human Geography 4(4): 525–548.
171 Schläpfer, F. and Witzig, P.J. (2006). Public support for river restoration funding in relation to local river ecomorphology, population density, and mean income. Water Resources Research 42(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004940.
172 Seidl, R. and Stauffacher, M. (2013). Evaluation of river restoration by local residents. Water Resources Research 49(10): 7077–7087.
173 Shields, F.D., Cooper Jr, C.M., Knight, S.S., et al. (2003). Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecological Engineering 20(5): 441–454.
174 Smith, B., Clifford, N.J., and Mant, J. (2014). The changing nature of river restoration. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 1(3): 249–261.
175 Sneddon, C.S., Barraud, R., and Germaine, M.A. (2017). Dam removals and river restoration in international perspective. Water Alternatives 10(3): 648–654.
176 Soto‐Montes de Oca, G. and Ramirez‐Fuentes, A. (2019). Value of river restoration when living near and far: the Atoyac Basin in Puebla, Mexico. Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24850/j‐tyca‐2019‐01‐07.
177 Stanford, J.A., Ward, J.V., Liss, W.J., et al. (1996). A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12(4–5): 391–413.
178 Steffen, W., Crutzen, P.J., and McNeill, J.R. (2007). The anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36(8): 214–221.
179 Sudding, K.N. (2011). Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 42: 465–487.
180 Szałkiewicz, E., Jusik, S., and Grygoruk, M. (2018). Status of and perspectives on river restoration in Europe: 310,000 euros per hectare of restored river. Sustainability 10(1): 129.
181 Tanaka, A. (2006). Stakeholder analysis of river restoration activity for eight years in a river channel. In: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation (eds A.T. Bull and D.L. Hawksworth), 447–471. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
182 Thorel, M., Piégay, H., Barthelemy, C., et al. (2018). Socio‐environmental implications of process‐based restoration strategies in large rivers: should we remove novel ecosystems along the Rhône (France)? Regional Environmental Change 18(7): 2019–2031.
183 Trumble, W.R. and Stevenson, A. (eds) (2002). Shorter Oxford English Dictionary: Volume 1. New York: Oxford University Press.
184 Tunstall, S.M., Penning‐Rowsell, E.C., Tapsell, S.M., et al. (2000). River restoration: public attitudes and expectations. Water and Environment Journal 14(5): 363–370.
185 Tunstall, S.M., Tapsell, S.M., and Eden, S. (1999). How stable are public responses to changing local environments? A “before” and “after” case study of river restoration. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(4): 527–545.
186 Turner, R.E. and Boyer, M.E. (1997). Mississippi River diversions, coastal wetland restoration/creation and an economy of scale. Ecological Engineering 8(2): 117–128.
187 Turner, R.K., Pearce, D., and Bateman, I. (1994). Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
188 van den Berg, A.E., Koole, S.L., and van der Wulp, N.Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (how) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(2): 135–146.
189 Vásquez, W.F. and de Rezende, C.E. (2019). Willingness to pay for the restoration of the Paraíba do Sul River: a contingent valuation study from Brazil. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 19(4): 610–619.
190 Vaughan, I.P., Diamond, M., Gurnell, A.M., et al. (2009). Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(1): 113–125.
191 Verbrugge, L. and van den Born, R. (2018). The role of place attachment in public perceptions of a re‐landscaping intervention in the river Waal (the Netherlands). Landscape and Urban Planning 177: 241–250.
192 Vermaat, J.E., Wagtendonk, A.J., Brouwer, R., et al. (2016). Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. Hydrobiologia 769(1): 121–135.
193 Vining, J., Tyler, E., and Kweon B.S. (2000). Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In: Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eds P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull), 143–162. Washington DC: Island Press.
194 Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315): 555–561.
195 Weber, C., Åberg, U., Buijse, A.D., et al. (2018). Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 5(1): 1257.
196 Weber, M.A. and Stewart, S. (2009). Public values for river restoration options on the Middle Rio Grande. Restoration Ecology 17(6): 762–771.
197 Wells, H.B.M. and Dougill, A.J. (2019). The importance of long term social ecological: research for the future of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 27(5): 929–933.
198 Westling, E.L., Surridge, B.W., Sharp, L., et al. (2014). Making sense of landscape change: long‐term perceptions among local residents following river restoration. Journal of Hydrology 519: 2613–2623.
199 Wilson, E.O. (1992). Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
200 Woelfle‐Erskine, C. (2017). Collaborative approaches to flow restoration in intermittent salmon‐bearing streams: Salmon Creek, CA, USA. Water 9(3): 217.
201 Wohl, E., Lane, S.N., and Wilcox, A.C. (2015). The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research 51(8): 5974–5997.
202 Wohl, E., Angermeier, P.L., Bledsoe, B., et al. (2005). River restoration. Water Resources Research 41(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985.
203 Wortley, L., Hero, J.M., and Howes, M. (2013). Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21(5): 537–543.
204 Yun, S.J. (2014). Experts’ social responsibility in the process of large‐scale nature‐transforming national projects: focusing on the case of the Four Major Rivers Restoration Project in Korea. Development and Society 43(1): 109–141.
205 Zhang, Y., Sheng, L., and Luo, Y. (2019). Evaluation of households’ willingness to accept the ecological restoration of rivers flowing in china. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 38(4): 13094.
206 Zhao, J., Liu, Q., Lin, L., et al. (2013). Assessing the comprehensive restoration of an urban river: an integrated application of contingent valuation in Shanghai, China. Science of the Total Environment 458: 517–526.
207 Zingraff‐Hamed, A., Noack, M., Greulich, S., et al. (2018). Model‐based evaluation of urban river restoration: conflicts between sensitive fish species and recreational users. Sustainability 10(6): 1747.
208 Zube, E.H. (1999). Environmental perception. In: Encyclopedia of Earth Science (eds D.E. Alexander and R.W. Fairbridge), 214–216. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
209 Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L., and Taylor, J.G. (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 9(1): 1–33.

Подняться наверх