Читать книгу Magnetic Resonance Microscopy - Группа авторов - Страница 28
References
Оглавление1 1 Callaghan, P.T. (1991). Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
2 2 Mansfield, P.and Grannell, P.K. (1973). NMR “diffraction” in solids. Journal of Physics C 6: L422–L426.
3 3 Blümler, P., Greferath, G., Blümich, B.et al. (1993). NMR imaging of objects containing similar substructures. Journal of Magnetic Resonance A 103: 142–150.
4 4 Blümich, B. (2016). k and q dedicated to Paul Callaghan. Journal of Magnetic Resonance A 267: 79–85.
5 5 Marx, V. (2013). Is super-resolution microscopy right for you? Nature Methods 10: 1157–1163.
6 6 Ciobanu, L., Seeber, D.A., and Pennington, C.H. (2002). 3D MR microscopy with resolution 3.7 µm by 3.3 µm by 3.3 µm. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 158 (1–2): 178–182.
7 7 Rugar, D., Budakian, R., Mamin, H.et al. (2004). Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy. Nature 430: 329–332.
8 8 Bar-Even, A., Noor, E., Savir, Y.et al. (2011). The moderately efficient enzyme: Evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry 50 (21): 4402–4410.
9 9 Chen, H.-Y., Aggarwal, R., Bok, R.A.et al. (2020). Hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate MRI detects real-time metabolic flux in prostate cancer metastases to bone and liver: A clinical feasibility study. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 23 (2): 269–276. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0180-z.
10 10 Staudacher, T., Shi, F., Pezzagna, S.et al. (2013). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a (5-nanometer)3 sample volume. Science 339 (6119): 561–563. doi: 10.1126/science.1231675.
11 11 Cho, Z.H., Ahn, C.B., Juh, S.C.et al. (1988). Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy with 4-µm resolution: Theoretical study and experimental results. Medical Physics 15 (6): 815–824. doi: 10.1118/1.596287.
12 12 Ahn, C.B.and Cho, Z.H. (1989). A generalized formulation of diffusion effects in µm resolution nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Physics 16 (1): 22–28. doi: 10.1118/1.596393.
13 13 McFarland, E.W.and Mortara, A. (1992). Three-dimensional NMR microscopy: Improving SNR with temperature and microcoils. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 10 (2): 279–288. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(92)90487-K.
14 14 Brandl, M.and Haase, A. (1994). Molecular diffusion in NMR microscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. Series B 103 (2): 162–167.
15 15 Ahn, C.B.and Chu, W.C. (1969). Optimal imaging strategies for three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 94 (3): 455–470. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(91)90132-D.
16 16 Blackband, S.J., Buckley, D.L., Bui, J.D.et al. (1999). NMR microscopy – Beginnings and new directions. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 9 (3): 112–116.
17 17 Mansfield, P. (1982). NMR Imaging in Biomedicine: Supplement 2 Advances in Magnetic Resonance, Volume 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18 18 Korvink, J.G., MacKinnon, N., Badilita, V.et al. (2019). “Small is beautiful” in NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 306: 112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.07.012.
19 19 Webb, A.G. (2013). Radiofrequency microcoils for magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 229: 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.10.004.
20 20 Fratila, R.M.and Velders, A.H. (2011). Small-volume nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 4 (1): 227–249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061010-114024.
21 21 Kentgens, A.P.M., Bart, J., Van Bentum, P.J.M.et al. (2008). High-resolution liquid-and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance of nanoliter sample volumes using microcoil detectors. Journal of Chemical Physics 128 (5): 052202. doi: 10.1063/1.2833560.
22 22 Badilita, V., Meier, R.C., Spengler, N.et al. (2012). Microscale nuclear magnetic resonance: A tool for soft matter research. Soft Matter 8 (41): 10583–10597.
23 23 Ciobanu, L., Seeber, D.A., and Pennington, C.H. (2002). 3D MR microscopy with resolution 3.7 μm by 3.3 μm by 3.3 μm. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 158 (1–2): 178–182. doi: 10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00071-X.
24 24 Gruschke, O.G., Baxan, N., Clad, L.et al. (2012). Lab on a chip phased-array MR multi-platform analysis system. Lab on a Chip 12 (3): 495–502. doi: 10.1039/c2lc20585h.
25 25 Roffmann, W.U., Crozier, S., Luescher, K.et al. (1996). Small birdcage resonators for high-field NMR microscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. Series B 111 (2): 174–177.
26 26 Spengler, N., Moazenzadeh, A., Meier, R.et al. (2014). Micro-fabricated Helmholtz coil featuring disposable microfluidic sample inserts for applications in nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 24 (3): 034004. doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/24/3/034004.
27 27 Schnall, M.D., Barlow, C., Subramanian, V.H.et al. (1969). Wireless implanted magnetic resonance probes for in vivo NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 68 (1): 161–167. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(86)90326-4.
28 28 Wirth, E.D., III, Mareci, T.H., Beck, B.L.et al. (1993). A comparison of an inductively coupled implanted coil with optimized surface coils for in vivo NMR imaging of the spinal cord. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 30 (5): 626–633. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300514.
29 29 Silver, X., Ni, W.X., Mercer, E.V.et al. (2001). In vivo 1H magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the rat spinal cord using an inductively-coupled chronically implanted RF coil. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 46 (6): 1216–1222. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1319.
30 30 Elshafiey, I., Bilgen, M., He, R.et al. (2002). In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of rat spinal cord at 7 T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20 (3): 243–247. doi: 10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00493-9.
31 31 Quick, H.H., Kuehl, H., Kaiser, G.et al. (2002). Inductively coupled stent antennas in MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 48 (5): 781–790. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10269.
32 32 Ginefri, J.-C., Rubin, A., Tatoulian, M.et al. (2012). Implanted, inductively-coupled, radiofrequency coils fabricated on flexible polymeric material: Application to in vivo rat brain MRI at 7T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 224: 61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.09.003.
33 33 Jouda, M., Kamberger, R., Leupold, J.et al. (2017). A comparison of Lenz lenses and LC resonators for NMR signal enhancement. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance. Part B, Magnetic Resonance Engineering 47B (3): e21357. doi: 10.1002/cmr.b.21357.
34 34 Nils Spengler, P.T., While, M.V., Meissner, U.W.et al. (2017). Magnetic Lenz lenses improve the limit-of-detection in nuclear magnetic resonance. PLoS ONE 12 (8): e0182779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182779.
35 35 Kamberger, R., Göbel-Guéniot, K., Gerlach, J.et al. (2018). Improved method for MR microscopy of brain tissue cultured with the interface method combined with Lenz lenses. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 52: 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.010.
36 36 Lichtman, J., Pfister, H., and Reid, C. (2020). Connections in the brain https://www.rc.fas.harvard.edu/case-studies/connections-in-the-brain (accessed 25 October 2020).
37 37 Fuhrer, E., Bäcker, A., Kraft, S.et al. (2018). 3D carbon scaffolds for neural stem cell culture and magnetic resonance imaging. Advanced Healthcare Materials 7 (4): 1700915. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700915.
38 38 Nimbalkar, S., Fuhrer, E., and Silva, P. (2019). Glassy carbon microelectrodes minimize induced voltages, mechanical vibrations, and artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Microsystems & Nanoengineering 5: 61. doi: 10.1038/s41378-019-0106-x.
39 39 Jouda, M., Klein, C.O., Korvink, J.G.et al. (2019). Gradient-induced mechanical vibration of neural interfaces during MRI. IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Engineering 67: 915–923. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2923693.
40 40 Bouilleret, V., Ridoux, V., Depaulis, A.et al. (1999). Recurrent seizures and hippocampal sclerosis following intrahippocampal kainate injection in adult mice: Electroencephalography, histopathology and synaptic reorganization similar to mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroscience 89 (3): 717–729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00401-1.
41 41 Göbel-Guéniot, K., Gerlach, J., Kamberger, R.et al. (2020). Histological correlates of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance microscopy in a mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Frontiers in Neuroscience 14: 543.
42 42 Janz, P., Schwaderlapp, N., Heining, K.et al. (2017). Early tissue damage and microstructural reorganization predict disease severity in experimental epilepsy. ELIFE 6: e25742. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25742.
43 43 Olson, D.L., Peck, T.L., Webb, A.G.et al. (1995). High-resolution microcoil 1H-NMR for mass-limited, nanoliter-volume samples. Science 270 (5244): 1967–1970.
44 44 Massin, C., Boero, G., Vincent, F.et al. (2002). High-Q factor RF planar microcoils for micro-scale NMR spectroscopy. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 97: 280–288. doi: 10.1016/s0924-4247(01)00847-0.
45 45 Montinaro, E., Grisi, M., Letizia, M.C.et al. (2018). 3D printed microchannels for subnL NMR spectroscopy. 13 (5): e0192780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192780.
46 46 Finch, G., Yilmaz, A., and Utz, M. (2016). An optimised detector for in-situ high-resolution NMR in microfluidic devices. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 262: 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2015.11011.
47 47 Yilmaz, A.and Utz, M. (2016). Characterisation of oxygen permeation into a microfluidic device for cell culture by in situ NMR spectroscopy. Lab on a Chip 16 (11): 2079. doi: 10.1039/c6lc00396f.
48 48 Flint, J.J., Menon, K., Hansen, B.et al. (2015). A microperfusion and in-bore oxygenator system designed for magnetic resonance microscopy studies on living tissue explants. Scientific Reports 5 (1): 18095. doi: 10.1038/srep18095.
49 49 Kalfe, A., Telfah, A., Lambert, J.et al. (2015). Looking into living cell systems: Planar waveguide microfluidic NMR detector for in vitro metabolomics of tumor spheroids. Analytical Chemistry 87 (14): 7402–7410. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01603.
50 50 Davoodi, H., Nordin, N., Bordonali, L.et al. (2020). An NMR-compatible microfluidic platform enabling in situ electrochemistry. Lab on a Chip 20 (17): 3202–3212. doi: 10.1039/d0lc00364f.
51 51 Bordonali, L., Nordin, N., Fuhrer, E.et al. (2019). Parahydrogen based NMR hyperpolarisation goes micro: An alveolus for small molecule chemosensing. Lab on a Chip 19: 503–512. doi: 10.1039/C8LC01259H.
52 52 Eills, J., Hale, W., Sharma, M.et al. (2019). High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with picomole sensitivity by hyperpolarization on a chip. Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (25): 9955–9963. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03507.
53 53 Lehmkuhl, S., Wiese, M., Schubert, L.et al. (2018). Continuous hyper-polarization with parahydrogen in a membrane reactor. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 291: 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.03.012.
54 54 Hiramoto, K., Ino, K., Nashimoto, Y.et al. (2019). Electric and electrochemical microfluidic devices for cell analysis. Frontiers in Chemistry 7 (396): 396. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00396.
55 55 Jayawickrama, D.A.and Sweedler, J.V. (2004). Dual microcoil NMR probe coupled to cyclic CE for continuous separation and analyte isolation. Analytical Chemistry 76 (16): 4894–4900. doi: 10.1021/ac049390o.
56 56 Grass, K., Böhme, U., Scheler, U.et al. (2008). Importance of hydrodynamic shielding for the dynamic behavior of short polyelectrolyte chains. Physical Review Letters 100 (9): 096104. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.096104.
57 57 Diekmann, J., Adams, K.L., Klunder, G.L.et al. (2011). Portable microcoil NMR detection coupled to capillary electrophoresis. Analytical Chemistry 83 (4): 1328–1335. doi: 10.1021/ac102389b.
58 58 Gomes, B., Pollyana, D.S., Lobo, C.et al. (2017). Strong magnetoelectrolysis effect during electrochemical reaction monitored in situ by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta 983: 91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.06.008.
59 59 Sorte, E.G., Jilani, S., and Tong, Y.J. (2017). Methanol and ethanol electrooxidation on PtRu and PtNiCu as studied by high-resolution in situ electrochemical NMR spectroscopy with interdigitated electrodes. Electrocatalysis 8: 95–102. doi: 10.1007/s12678-016-0344-8.
60 60 Zu-Rong, N., Cui, X.-H., Cao, S.-H.et al.(2017). A novel in situ electrochemical NMR cell with a palisade gold film electrode. AIP Advances 7 (8): 085205. doi: 10.1063/1.4997887.
61 61 Da Silva, P., Gomes, B., Lobo, C.et al. (2019). Electrochemical NMR spectroscopy: Electrode construction and magnetic sample stirring. Microchemical Journal 146: 658–663. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.01.010.
62 62 Swyer, I., Soong, R., Dryden, M.D.M.et al. (2016). Interfacing digital microfluidics with high-field nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Lab on a Chip 16 (22): 4424–4435. doi: 10.1039/C6LC01073C.
63 63 Swyer, I., Von Der Ecken, S., Wu, B.et al. (2019). Digital microfluidics and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for in situ diffusion measurements and reaction monitoring. Lab on a Chip 19: 641–653. doi: 10.1039/c8lc01214h.
64 64 Hilty, C., McDonnell, E.E., Granwehr, J.et al. (2005). Microfluidic gas-flow profiling using remote-detection NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (42): 14960–14963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507566102.
65 65 Zhivonitko, V.V., Telkki, V.-V., Leppäniemi, J.et al. (2013). Remote detection NMR imaging of gas phase hydrogenation in microfluidic chips. Lab on a Chip 13 (8): 1554–1561. doi: 10.1039/c3lc41309h.
66 66 Jiménez-Martínez, R., Kennedy, D.J., Rosenbluh, M.et al. (2014). Optical hyperpolarization and NMR detection of 129Xe on a microfluidic chip. Nature Communications 5 (1): 3908. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4908.
67 67 Kennedy, D.J., Seltzer, S.J., Jiménez-Martínez, R.et al. (2017). An optimized microfabricated platform for the optical generation and detection of hyperpolarized 129Xe. Scientific Reports 7 (1): 43994. doi: 10.1038/srep43994.
68 68 Kurhanewicz, J., Vigneron, D.B., Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.et al. (2019). Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: Path to clinical translation in oncology. Neoplasia 21 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.09.006.
69 69 Jeong, S., Eskandari, R., Park, S.et al. (2017). Real-time quantitative analysis of metabolic flux in live cells using a hyper-polarized micromagnetic resonance spectrometer. Science Advances 3 (6): e1700341. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700341.
70 70 Mompéan, M., Sánchez-Donoso, R.M., De La Hoz, A.et al. (2018). Pushing nuclear magnetic resonance sensitivity limits with microfluidics and photo-chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization. Nature Communications 9 (1): 108. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02575-0.
71 71 Uberrück, T., Adams, M., Granwehr, J.et al.(2020). A compact X-Band ODNP spectrometer towards hyperpolarized 1H spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 314: 106724. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106724.
72 72 Kiss, S. (2019). Overhauser DNP probes for compact magnetic resonance. PhD thesis. University of Freiburg, Germany.