Читать книгу The Science of Reading - Группа авторов - Страница 82

References

Оглавление

1 Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. F., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J. S., … & Scaltritti, M. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1052–1067. doi: 10.3758/s13428‐013‐0442‐y.

2 Alderson‐Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. doi: 10.1037/bul0000021.

3 Antia, S. D., Lederberg, A. R., Easterbrooks, S., Schick, B., Branum‐Martin, L., Connor, C. M., & Webb, M. Y. (2020). Language and reading progress of young deaf and hard‐of‐hearing Children. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 25(3), 334–350. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz050.

4 Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press.

5 Besner, D. (1987). Phonology, lexical access in reading, and articulatory suppression: A critical review. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(3), 467–478. doi: 10.1080/14640748708401799.

6 Blazely, A. M., Coltheart, M., & Casey, B. J. (2005). Semantic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: Implications for models of reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(6), 695–717. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000257.

7 Blythe, H. I., Dickins, J. H., Kennedy, C. R., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Phonological processing during silent reading in teenagers who are deaf/hard of hearing: An eye movement investigation. Developmental Science, 21(5), e12643. doi: 10.1111/desc.12643.

8 Brysbaert, M. (2003). Bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from masked phonological priming. In S. Kinoshita & S.J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state‐of‐the‐art (pp. 323–343). Psychology Press.

9 Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta‐analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104047. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047.

10 Brysbaert, M., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2009). Is there room for the BBC in the mental lexicon? On the recognition of acronyms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1832–1842. doi: 10.1080/17470210802585471.

11 Brysbaert, M., Van Dyck, G., & Van de Poel, M. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 137–148. doi: 10.1037//0096‐1523.25.1.137.

12 Cai, Q., Lavidor, M., Brysbaert, M. Paulignan, Y., & Nazir, T.A. (2008). Cerebral lateralization of frontal lobe language processes and the lateralization of the posterior visual word processing system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 672–681. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20043.

13 Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1398–1407. doi: 10.1177/0956797612473122.

14 Carver, R. P. (1982). Optimal rate of reading prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 56–88. doi: 10.2307/747538.

15 Chang, Y. N., Taylor, J. S. H., Rastle, K., & Monaghan, P. (2020). The relationships between oral language and reading instruction: Evidence from a computational model of reading. Cognitive Psychology, 123, 101336. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101336.

16 Chitiri, H. F., & Willows, D. M. (1997). Bilingual word recognition in English and Greek. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(2), 139–156. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400009942.

17 Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C. (1987). Deep dyslexia since 1980. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), International library of psychology. Deep dyslexia (pp. 407–451). Routledge.

18 Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295x.108.1.204.

19 Costello, B., Caffarra, S., Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J.A., & Carreiras, M. (2021). Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish. Scientific Reports, 11, 5202. doi: 10.1038/s41598‐021‐84490‐5.

20 Daneman, M., & Stainton, M. (1991). Phonological recoding in silent reading. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 618–632. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.17.4.618.

21 Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738.

22 Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015). Illiterate to literate: Behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 234–244. doi: 10.1038/nrn3924.

23 Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1982). Phonetic factors in letter detection: A reevaluation. Memory & cognition, 10(2), 145–154. doi: 10.3758/bf03209216.

24 Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 365–382. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401116.

25 Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203–233. doi: 10.1023/a:1023202116609.

26 Friesen, D. C., & Jared, D. (2012). Cross‐language phonological activation of meaning: Evidence from category verification. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 145–156. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000489.

27 Friesen, D. C., Whitford, V., Titone, D., & Jared, D. (2020). The impact of individual differences on cross‐language activation of meaning by phonology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 323–343. doi: 10.1017/S1366728919000142.

28 Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71–99. doi: 10.1037/0033‐2909.123.1.71.

29 Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104–115. doi: 10.1037//0096‐1523.13.1.104.

30 Galletly, S. A., & Knight, B. A. (2004). The high cost of orthographic disadvantage. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 9(4), 4–11. doi: 10.1080/19404150409546774.

31 Gerrits, R., Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., & Vingerhoets, G. (2019). Laterality for recognizing written words and faces in the fusiform gyrus covaries with language dominance. Cortex, 117, 196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.010.

32 Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 5(4), 674–691. doi: 10.1037/0096‐1523.5.4.674.

33 Gollan, T. H., Forster, K. I., & Frost, R. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew‐English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1122–1139. doi: 10.1037//0278‐7393.23.5.1122.

34 Grainger, J. Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P.J. (2006). The time‐course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280.2006.01821.x.

35 Hanley, R., Masterson, J., Spencer, L., & Evans, D. (2004). How long do the advantages of learning to read a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(8), 1393–1410. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000819.

36 Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.111.3.662.

37 Huettig, F., Lachmann, T., Reis, A., & Petersson, K. M. (2018). Distinguishing cause from effect–many deficits associated with developmental dyslexia may be a consequence of reduced and suboptimal reading experience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(3), 333–350. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1348528.

38 Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: The Macmillan Company.

39 Jouravlev, O., & Jared, D. (2018). Cross‐script orthographic and phonological preview benefits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 11–19. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1226906.

40 Keck, T., & Wolgemuth, K. (2020). American Sign Language Phonological Awareness and English Reading Abilities: Continuing to Explore New Relationships. Sign Language Studies, 20(2), 334–354. doi: 10.1353/sls.2020.0004.

41 Kinoshita, S., Gayed, M., & Norris, D. (2018). Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same–different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(11), 1661–1671. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000548.

42 Kuperman, V., Kyröläinen, A.J., Porretta, V., Brysbaert, M., & Yang, S. (2021). A lingering question addressed: Reading rate and most efficient listening rate are highly similar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(8), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000932.

43 Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 285–294. doi: 10.1037//0278‐7393.19.2.285.

44 Lindgren, S.D., De Renzi, E., Richman, L.C. (1985). Cross‐national comparisons of developmental dyslexia in Italy and the United‐States. Child Development, 56, 1404–1417. doi: 10.2307/1130460.

45 Liu, X., Vermeylen, L., Wisniewski, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). The contribution of phonological information to visual word recognition: Evidence from Chinese phonetic radicals. Cortex. Advance publication available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.010.

46 Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual access is initially phonological: 1 Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107–128. doi: 10.1037//0096‐3445.123.2.107.

47 Manguel, A. (1996). A History of Reading. HarperCollins.

48 McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). The visual tongue‐twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(6), 672–687. doi: 10.1016/S0022‐5371(82)90870‐2.

49 Morais, J., Alegría, J., & Content, A. (1987). The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 7(5), 415–438.

50 Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2012). Cross‐script phonological priming for Japanese‐English bilinguals: Evidence for integrated phonological representations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(10), 1563–1583. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.606669.

51 Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2012). Reading through a noisy channel: Why there's nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review, 119(3), 517–545. doi: 10.1037/a0028450.

52 Patterson, K.E. (1982): The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In A.W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functioning (pp. 77–111). London: Academic Press.

53 Pearson, P.D., & Goodin, S. (2010). Silent reading pedagogy: A historical perspective. In E.H. Hiebert & D.R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers (pp. 3–23). International Reading Association. doi: 10.1598/0833.01.

54 Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed‐letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(9), 1600–1613. doi: 10.1080/17470210500298880.

55 Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed‐letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841. doi: 10.3758/bf03196438.

56 Perea, M., Nakatani, C., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature? Memory & Cognition, 39(4), 700–707. doi: 10.3758/s13421‐010‐0052‐1.

57 Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 473–485. doi: 10.1016/0749‐596X(91)90017‐E.

58 Perfetti, C., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2012.689786.

59 Perre, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). Orthographic effects in spoken language: On‐line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research, 1275, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018.

60 Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273–315. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.114.2.273.

61 Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 148–162. doi: 10.1037//0096‐1523.18.1.148.

62 Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Palethorpe, S., & Castles, A. (2012). Nonword reading: Comparing dual‐route cascaded and connectionist dual‐process models with human data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1268–1288. doi: 10.1037/a0026703.

63 Rastle, K. & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002.

64 Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 482–503. doi: 10.1037/0096‐1523.25.2.482.

65 Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–226. doi: 10.1016/0010‐0285(80)90009‐2.

66 Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading‐related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta‐analysis. Annals of Dyslexia. Advance publication available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881‐020‐00205‐x.

67 Roebuck, H., & Lupyan, G. (2020). The Internal Representations Questionnaire: Measuring modes of thinking. Behavior Research Methods, 52(5), 2053–2070. doi: 10.3758/s13428‐020‐01354‐y.

68 Schmalz, X., Marinus, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1614–1629. doi: 10.3758/s13423‐015‐0835‐2.

69 Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295x.96.4.523.

70 Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self‐teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 95–129. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2481.

71 Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2020). Annual Research Review: Reading disorders revisited –The critical importance of oral language. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(5), 635–653. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13324.

72 Tan, L. H., Laird, A. R., Li, K., & Fox, P. T. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: A meta‐analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 83–91. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20134.

73 Taylor, J. S. H., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta‐analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 766–791. doi: 10.1037/a0030266.

74 Timmer, K., Ganushchak, L. Y., Ceusters, I., & Schiller, N. O. (2014). Second language phonology influences first language word naming. Brain and Language, 133, 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.004.

75 van der Haegen, L., Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Collateralization of Broca’s area and the visual word form area in left‐handers: fMRI evidence. Brain and Language, 122, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.11.004.

76 van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 181–198. doi: 10.3758/bf03197716.

77 van Wijnendaele, I., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 616–627. doi: 10.1037/0096‐1523.28.3.616.

78 Vasilev, M. R., Yates, M., & Slattery, T. J. (2019). Do readers integrate phonological codes across saccades? A Bayesian meta‐analysis and a survey of the unpublished literature. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 43. doi: 10.5334/joc.87.

79 Vilhauer, R. (2016). Inner reading voices: An overlooked form of inner speech. Psychosis, 8(1), 37–47. doi: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1028972.

80 Vilhauer, R. P. (2017). Characteristics of inner reading voices. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(4), 269–274. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12368.

81 Ward, N. (1998). Artificial intelligence and other approaches to speech understanding: Reflection on methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10, 487–493. doi: 10.1080/095281398146716.

82 Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. doi: 10.3758/bf03196158.

83 Woollams, A. M., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Madrid, G., & Patterson, K. E. (2016). Do you read how I read? Systematic individual differences in semantic reliance amongst normal readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01757.

84 Wright, G., Sherman, R., & Jones, T. B. (2004). Are silent reading behaviors of first graders really silent? The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 546–553.

85 Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2010). Chinese–English bilinguals reading English hear Chinese. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(22), 7646–7651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1602‐10.2010.

86 Xu, B., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 26–36. doi: 10.3758/bf03201210.

87 Zhang, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1993). The tongue‐twister effect in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1082–1093. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.19.5.1082.

88 Zhao, R., Fan, R., Liu, M., Wang, X., & Yang, J. (2017). Rethinking the function of brain regions for reading Chinese characters in a meta‐analysis of fMRI studies. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 120–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.04.001.

89 Zhou, H., Chen, B., Yang, M., & Dunlap, S. (2010). Language nonselective access to phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese–English bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 2051–2066. doi: 10.1080/17470211003718705.

90 Zhou, P., & Christianson, K. (2016). I “hear” what you're “saying”: Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 972–995. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1018282.

91 Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1037/0033‐2909.131.1.3.

92 Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self‐teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120397. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0397.

93 Ziegler, J. C., Petrova, A., & Ferrand, L. (2008). Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 643–661. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.34.3.643.

The Science of Reading

Подняться наверх