Читать книгу Continuous Emission Monitoring - James A. Jahnke - Страница 76

REFERENCES

1 Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) (1998). Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) Code. Alberta Government. Edmonton. (In revision – Revision scheduled for publication in 2022)
2 Argentina Ambiental ‐ Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (2001). Gaseous Emissions. Resolution 2145/01. Secretariat of Environmental Policy. https://argentinambiental.com/legislacion (accessed 12 November 2021).
3 Argentina Ambiental ‐ Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (2002). Continuous Emission Monitoring System. Resolution 937/02. Secretariat of Environmental Policy. https://argentinambiental.com/legislacion (accessed 12 November 2021).
4 Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción (CMIC) (2020). Official Mexican Standards Index. https://www.cmic.org.mx/comisiones/Sectoriales/medioambiente/Varios/Leyes_y_Normas_SEMARNAT/NOM/nom.htm (accessed 12 November 2021).
5 Canadian Council of Ministers (CCME) (2006). Canada‐wide standards for mercury emissions from coal‐fired electric power generation plants. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 11 October 2006.
6 Canadian Council of Ministers (CCME) 2007. Monitoring protocol in support of the Canada‐wide standards for mercury emissions from coal‐fired electric power generation plants.
7 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) – India (2018a). Guidelines for Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
8 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) – India (2018b). Compliance Reporting Protocols for Online Continuous Emission & Effluent Monitoring Systems (OCEMS). Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
9 Chile. (2003). Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Chile on Environmental Cooperation. https://2009‐2017.state.gov/documents/organization/131463.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021).
10 Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA). (2006). Estabelece os Limites Máximos de Emissão de Poluentes Atmosféricos para Fontes Fixas. Resolução CONAMA No. 382. Brasil Ministério de Meio Ambiente.
11 Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA). (2011). Estabelece os Limites Máximos de Emissão de Poluentes Atmosféricos para Fontes Fixas Instaladas ou com Pedido de Licença de Instalaçao Anteriores a 02 de Janeiro de 2007. Resolução CONAMA No. 436.
12 Duflo, E., Greenstone, M., Pande, R., and Rya, N. (2013) Truth‐telling by third ‐party auditors and the response of polluting firms: experimental evidence from India. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) – Working Paper Series. https://www.nber.org/papers/w19259 (accessed 12 November 2021).
13 Ente Nacional Regulador de la Electricidad (ENRE) (2012). Anexo a la Resolución ENRE Nº 13/2012 Procedimiento para la Medición y Registro de Emisiones de la Atmósfera.
14 Environment Canada (2005). Protocols and Performance Specifications for Continuous Monitoring of Gaseous Emissions from Thermal Power Generation. Ottawa: EC, EPS 1/PG/7 (Note: currently in revision.)
15 Environmental‐Expert (2020). Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEMS) Equipment for Monitoring and Testing in Latin America. https://www.environmental‐expert.com/monitoring‐testing/continuous‐emissions‐monitoring‐cems/products/location‐latin‐america (accessed 12 November 2021).
16 European Union (EU) (2010). Directive 2010/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). OJL 334. Official Journal of the European Union.
17 Government of Ontario (2020a). Industry Emissions – Nitrogen Oxides and Sulphur Dioxide. Ontario Regulation 194/05. Toronto: Government of Ontario.
18 Government of Ontario (2020b). Emissions Trading. Ontario Regulation 397/01. Toronto: Government of Ontario.
19 Hellwig, V.G. (1980). Using continuous emission monitoring to document continuing compliance. Paper presented at Air Pollution Control Association Meeting, Montreal, paper 80‐70.4 (22–27 June 1980).
20 Jahnke, J.A. (1986) Conference Overview. In Continuous Emission Monitoring – Advances and Issues. International Specialty Conference. Baltimore. TR‐7. pp 452–455. Air Pollution Control Association. Pittsburgh
21 Karplus, V.J., Zhang, S., and Almond, D. (2018). Quantifying coal power plant responses to tighter SO2 standards in China. PNAS 115 (27): 7004–7009.
22 Kerstetter, D.L. (1985). Pennsylvania's continuous emission monitoring enforcement policy. In: Transactions – Continuous Emission Monitoring – Advances and Issues (ed. J.A. Jahnke), 187–198. Pittsburgh: Air Pollution Control Association.
23 Lents, J.M. and Leyden, P. (1996). RECLAIM: Los Angeles' new market‐based smog cleanup program. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 46 (3): 195–206.
24 Mangus, N.J. (1997). Lessons learned about monitor performance from acid rain program emissions data. In: Proceedings – Acid Rain & Electric Utilities II, VIP‐70 (ed. P. Dayal), 207–215. Pittsburgh: Air & Waste Management Association.
25 Marbek Resource Consultants (2009). Assessment of Regulatory Quantification and Reporting Requirements for Air Emissions from Industrial Facilities. PN 1423. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
26 McCoy, P.G. (1985). The use of CEM data in Subpart D enforcement. In: Transactions – Continuous Emission Monitoring – Advances and Issues (ed. J.A. Jahnke), 146–174. Pittsburgh: Air Pollution Control Association.
27 McCoy, P.G. (1990). The “CEM Nation”: an analysis of U.S. EPA's database – 1989. In: Proceedings – Continuous Emission Monitoring – Present and Future Applications, 10–36. Pittsburgh: Air & Waste Management Association.
28 McKee, H.C. (1974). Texas regulation requires control of opacity using instrumental measurements. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 24: 601–604.
29 Ministerio de Ambiente, (Minambiente) Vivianda y Desarrello Territorial (2008). Por la Cual se Establecen Las Normas y est ándares de Emisión Admisibles de Contaminantes a la Atmósfera por Fuentes Fijas y se Dictan Otras Dispociones. Resolución Número 909, 5 de junio de 2008. Colombia. https://www.minambiente.gov.co (accessed 12 November 2021).
30 Ministerio del Ambiente (Ministry of the Environment) (MINAM) (2014). Aprueban Limites Máximos Permisibles (LMP) Para Emisiones de Actividad de Generación Termoeléctrica. Ministerial Resolution 162‐ 2014‐MINAM. Government of Peru. https://www.minam.gob.pe/disposiciones/resolucion‐ministerial‐n‐162‐2014‐minam (accessed 12 November 2021).
31 Ministerio del Ambiente (Ministry of the Environment) (MINAM) (2016). Protocolo Nacional de Sistemas de Monitoreo Continuo de Emsiones (CEMS). Ministerial Resolution 201‐ 2016‐MINAM. Government of Peru. https://www.minam.gob.pe/disposiciones/resolucion‐ministerial‐n‐201‐2016‐minam (accessed 12 November 2021).
32 Ministerio del Ambiente (Ministry of the Environment) (MINAM) (2020). Aprueban Limites Máximos Permisibles Para Emisiones Atmosféricas de Plantas Industriales de Fabricación de Cemento y/o Cal. Ministerial Resolution 001‐2020‐MINAM. Government of Peru. https://www.minam.gob.pe/disposiciones/resolucion‐ministerial‐n‐201‐2016‐minam (accessed 12 November 2021).
33 Ministerio del Ambiente y Agua (2015). Standards for Air Emissions from Fixed Combustion Sources (Annex II, Book VI of the Unified Text of the Secondary Legislation of the Ministry of the Environment). Decree No. 3516. Ministry of the Environment Ecuador. https://www.ambiente.gob.ec (accessed 12 November 2021).
34 Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA) (1999). Establece Norma de Emisión para Olores Molestos (Compuestos Sulfuro de Hidrogeno Mercaptanos Gases TRS) Asociados a la Fabricacion de Pulpa Sulfada Decreto Supremo Nº 167. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile
35 Ministero del Medio Ambiente (MMA) (2011). Establece Norma de Emisión Para Centrales Termoeléctricas. Decreto Supremo Nº 13. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile
36 Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA) (2013a). Establece Norma de Emisión de Fudiciones Cobre y Fuentes Emiseros de Arsénico. Decreto Supremo Nº 28. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile
37 Ministero del Medio Ambiente (MMA) (2013b). Establece Norma de Emisión para Incineración, Coincineración, Y Coprocesamiento, Decreto Supremo Nº 45 de 2007. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile.
38 Mohin, T.J. (1992). CAA Title II challenges EPA. Environmental Protection June: 10–18.
39 Montoya, L. (2020). Private communication.
40 Morrell, S. (2020). Private communication.
41 Neulicht, R., Trenholm, A., and Bivins, D. (1996). Preparing a compliance assurance monitoring plan. In: Proceedings – Continuous Compliance Monitoring Under the Clean Air Act Amendments, 85–95. Pittsburgh: Air & Waste Management Association.
42 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) (1998). Technical Guidance Document: Compliance Assurance Monitoring. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016‐05/documets/ca‐tgd.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021).
43 Qingfeng, D. and Yuhong, H. (1997). Emissions monitoring and control of coal‐fired power plants in China. In: Proceeding: International Workshop on Continuous Emissions Monitoring, 265–271. London: IEA Coal Research.
44 Quarles, P. and Peeler, J.W. (1986). Handbook for the Review of Excess Emission Reports. EPA‐340‐186‐011.
45 Schakenbach, R.V. and Forte, R. (2006). Fundamental of successful monitoring, reporting, and verification under a Cap‐and ‐Trade program. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 56 (11): 1576–1583.
46 Schmalensee, R. and Stavins, R.N. (2013). The SO2 allowance trading system: the ironic history of a grand experiment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (1): 103–122.
47 Schmalensee, R. and Stavins, R.N. (2015). Lessons learned from three decades of experience with Cap‐and‐Trade. NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper 21742. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21742 (accessed 12 November 2021).
48 Schreifels, J. and Napolitano, S. (2014). Efficient, effective, and Credible Cap and Trade: lessons learned from the U.S. Acid Rain Program.
49 Shouse, K.C. (2018). The clean air act’s good neighbor provision: overview of interstate air pollution control. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45299.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021).
50 Sloss, L.L. (1997). Continuous Emissions Monitoring for Coal‐Fired Power Stations. London: IEA Coal Research.
51 Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (SMA) (2019). Resolution No. 1743 – 6 December 2019. Protocolo Para Validacion de Sistemas de Monitoreo Continuo de Emisiones “CEMS”. Government of Chile.
52 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1975). Requirements for Submittal of Implementation Plans. Standards for New Stationary Sources. 40 FR 46240 (6 October 1975).
53 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997a). Credible Evidence Revisions – Final Rule, 62 FR 8314 (24 February). Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
54 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997b). Interim Policy and Guidance on the Use of Credible Evidence in Air Enforcement Activities (Memorandum). https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/memorandum‐interim‐policy‐and‐guidance‐use‐credible‐evidence‐air‐enforcement‐activities (accessed 12 November 2021).
55 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998). 40 CFR Parts 51, 76, and 96 – Supplemental Notice for the Finding of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone; Proposed Rule, 63 FR 25902 (11 May 1998). Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
56 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003). Part 75 CEMS Field Audit Manual. https://epa.gov/airmarkets/field‐audit‐manual (accessed 12 November 2021).
57 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009). Plain English Guide to the Part 75 Rule. Clean Air Markets Division. https://epa.gov/airmarkets/monitoring/plain‐english‐guide‐part‐75‐rule (accessed 12 November 2021).
58 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010). Clean Air Interstate Rule – 2009 Emission, Compliance and Market Analysis. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015‐08/documents/cair09_ecm:analyses.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021).
59 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012). EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards. EPA‐600/R‐12/531
60 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2013). Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Technical Q&A. https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/part‐75‐emissions‐monitoring‐technical‐qas (accessed 12 November 2021).
61 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014a). Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources – Final Rule.79 FR 28439 (16 May 2014).
62 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014b). Program Progress – Clean Air Interstate Rule, Acid Rain Program, and former NOx Budget Trading Program. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017‐09/documents/2014_full_report.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021).
63 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014c). Guidance on Federally‐Reportable Violations for Clean Air Act Stationary Sources. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013‐10/documents/caastationary‐guidance.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021).
64 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020a). Standards of performance for new stationary sources – Subpart A – general provisions. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60 Subpart A. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
65 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020b). Requirements for preparation, adoption, and submittal of implementation plans. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 51. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
66 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020c). Standards of performance for new stationary sources – Appendix A – test methods. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60 Appendix B. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
67 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020d). Standards of performance for new stationary sources – Appendix B – performance specifications. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60 Appendix B. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
68 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020e). Standards of performance for new stationary sources – Appendix F – quality assurance. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60 Appendix F. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
69 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020f). Acid rain program: continuous emission monitoring. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 75. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
70 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020g). Acid rain program: continuous emission monitoring – Appendix A – specifications and test procedures. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 75 Appendix A. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
71 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020h). Acid rain program: continuous emission monitoring – Appendix B – quality assurance and quality control procedures. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 75 Appendix B. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
72 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020i). Standards for the management of specific Hazardous wastes and specific types of Hazardous Waste management facilities – Appendix IX – methods manual for compliance with the BIF regulations. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 266 Appendix IX. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
73 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020j). Definitions – Compliance Assurance Monitoring. 40 CFR 64.1. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.
74 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) (2018). ASOP‐10: Air Standard Operating Procedure for Reviewing Excess Emission Reports (EERs). Richmond: Commonwealth of Virginia. https://www.townhall.virginia.gov.
75 Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation (WADER) (2016). Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) Code for Stationary Source Air Emissions. Perth, Western Australia. Government of Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation.
76 Zhang, X. and Schreifels, J. (2011). Continuous emission monitoring systems at power plants in China: improving SO2 emission measurement. Energy Policy 39 (11): 7432–7438.
77 Zhu, F., Li, H., and Qiu, S. (2010). Development and application prospects of gas continuous emission monitoring systems. Environmental Monitoring Management and Technology 22 (4): 10–14.

Подняться наверх