Читать книгу Geochemistry - William M. White - Страница 145
3.11.1.1 Hydrogen scale potential, EH
ОглавлениеThe established convention is to measure potentials in a standard hydrogen electrode cell (at standard temperature and pressure). The cell consists on one side of a platinum plate coated with fine Pt powder that is surrounded by H2 gas maintained at a partial pressure of 1 atm and immersed in a solution of unit H+ activity. The other side consists of the electrode and solution under investigation. A potential of 0 is assigned to the half-cell reaction:
(3.104)
where the subscript g denotes the gas phase. The potential measured for the entire reaction is then assigned to the half-cell reaction of interest. Thus, for example, the potential of the reaction:
is –0.763 V. This value is assigned to the reaction:
(3.105)
Table 3.3 EH° and pε° for some half-cell reactions.
Half-cell reaction | EH° (V) | pε° |
Li+ + e– ⇌ Li | −3.05 | −51.58 |
Ca2+ + 2 e– ⇌ Ca | −2.93 | −49.55 |
Th4+ + 4e– ⇌ Th | −1.83 | −30.95 |
U4+ + 4e– ⇌ U | −1.38 | −23.34 |
Mn2+ +2e– ⇌ Mn | −1.18 | −19.95 |
Zn2+ + 2e– ⇌ Zn | −0.76 | −12.85 |
Cr3+ +3e– ⇌ Cr | −0.74 | −12.51 |
CO2(g) + 4H+ + 4e– ⇌ CH2O*+2H2O | −0.71 | −12.01 |
Fe2+ + 2e– ⇌ Fe | −0.44 | −7.44 |
Eu3+ + e– ⇌ Eu2+ | −0.36 | −6.08 |
Ni2+ + 2e– ⇌ Ni | −0.26 | −4.34 |
Pb2+ + 2e– ⇌ Pb | −0.13 | −2.2 |
CrO42− + 4H2O +3e– ⇌ Cr(OH)3 + H2O | −0.13 | −2.2 |
2H+ + 2e– ⇌ H2(g) | 0 | 0 |
N2(g) + 6H+ + 6e– ⇌ 2NH3 | 0.093 | 1.58 |
Cu2+ + 2e– ⇌ Cu | 0.34 | 5.75 |
UO22+ + 2e– ⇌ UO2 | 0.41 | 6.85 |
S + 2e– ⇌ S2− | 0.44 | 7.44 |
Cu+ + e– ⇌ Cu | 0.52 | 8.79 |
Fe3+ + e– ⇌ Fe2+ | 0.77 | 13.02 |
NO3+ + 2H+ + e– ⇌ NO2(g) + H2O | 0.80 | 13.53 |
Ag+ + e– ⇌ Ag | 0.80 | 13.53 |
Hg2+ + 2e– ⇌ Hg | 0.85 | 14.37 |
MnO2(s) + 4H+ + 2e– ⇌ Mn2+ + 2H2O | 1.22 | 20.63 |
O2 + 4H+ + 4e– ⇌ 2H2O | 1.23 | 20.80 |
MnO4– + 8H+ + 5e– ⇌ Mn2+ + 4H2O | 1.51 | 25.53 |
Au+ + e– ⇌ Au | 1.69 | 28.58 |
Ce4+ + e– ⇌ Ce3+ | 1.72 | 29.05 |
Pt+ + e– ⇌ Pt | 2.64 | 44.64 |
* CH2O refers to carbohydrate, the basic product of photosynthesis.
and called the hydrogen scale potential, or EH, of this reaction. Thus, the EH for the reduction of Zn+2 to Zn0 is −0.763 V. The hydrogen scale potentials of a few half-cell reactions are listed in Table 3.3. The sign convention for EH is that the sign of the potential is positive when the reaction proceeds from left to right (i.e., from reactants to products). Thus, if a reaction has positive EH, the metal ion will be reduced by hydrogen gas to the metal. If a reaction has negative EH, the metal will be oxidized to the ion and H+ reduced. The standard state potentials (298 K, 0.1 MPa) of more complex reactions can be predicted by algebraic combinations of the reactions and potentials in Table 3.3 (see Example 3.11).
The half-cell reactions in Table 3.3 are arranged in order of increasing . Thus, a species on the product (right) side of a given reaction will reduce (give up electrons to) the species on the reactant side in all reactions listed below it. Thus, in the Daniell cell reaction in Figure 3.18, Zn metal will reduce Cu2+ in solution. Zn may thus be said to be a stronger reducing agent than Cu.
Electrochemical energy is another form of free energy and can be related to the Gibbs free energy of reaction as:
(3.106)
and
(3.107)
where z is the number of electrons per mole exchanged (e.g., 2 in the reduction of zinc) and is the Faraday constant ( = 96,485 coulombs; 1 joule = 1 volt-coulomb). The free energy of formation of a pure element is 0 (by convention). Thus, the ΔG in a reaction that is opposite one such as 3.105, such as:
is the free energy of formation of the ion from the pure element. From eqn. 3.106 we can calculate the ΔG for the reduction of zinc as 147.24 kJ/mol. The free energy of formation of Zn2+ would be −147.24 kJ/mol. Given the free energy of formation of an ion, we can also use eqn. 3.105 to calculate the hydrogen scale potential. Since
(3.108)
we can substitute eqns. 3.106 and 3.107 into 3.108 and also write
(3.109)
Equation 3.109 is known as the Nernst equation.† At 298 K and 0.1 MPa it reduces to:
(3.110)
We can deduce the meaning of this relationship from the relationship between ΔG and E in eqn. 3.106. At equilibrium ΔG is zero. Thus, in eqn. 3.108, activities will adjust themselves such that E is 0.