Читать книгу The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics - Carol A. Chapelle - Страница 150

1 Alderson, J. C. (1991). Bands and scores. In J. C. Alderson & B. North (Eds.), Language testing in the 1990s: The communicative legacy (pp. 71–86). London, England: Macmillan.

2 American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2009). Testing for proficiency: The ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Retrieved April 2, 2019 from https://www.actfl.org/professional-development/assessments-the-actfl-testing-office/oral-proficiency-assessments-including-opi-opic

3 Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

4 Becker, A., Matsugu, S., & Mansoor, A. (2017). Balancing practicality and construct representativeness for IEP speaking tests. Asian‐Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2. doi: 10.1186/s40862‐017‐0041‐z

5 Bernstein, J. C. (2012). Computer scoring of spoken responses. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 857–63). New York, NY: Wiley‐Blackwell.

6 Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co‐constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26(3), 341–66.

7 Brown, A. (1995). The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation‐specific performance test. Language Testing, 12(1), 1–15.

8 Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

9 Chalhoub‐Deville, M. (1995). Deriving oral assessment scales across different tests and rater groups. Language Testing, 12(1), 16–21.

10 Chalhoub‐Deville, M., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Rater judgment and English language speaking proficiency. World Englishes, 24(3), 383–91.

11 Clark, J. L. D. (1979). Direct vs. semi‐direct tests of speaking ability. In E. J. Briere & F. B. Hinofotis (Eds.), Concepts in language testing: Some recent studies (pp. 35–49). Washington, DC: TESOL.

12 Council of Europe. (2001). The common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, and assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

13 Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.

14 Davidson, F. (2006). World Englishes and test construction. In B. B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & C. Nelson (Eds.), The handbook of world Englishes (pp. 709–17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‐Blackwell.

15 De Jong, N. (2018). Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 237–54. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780

16 Dimova, S. (2017). Pronunciation assessment in the context of World Englishes. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 49–66). Oxford, England: Routledge.

17 Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26(4), 423–43.

18 Figueras, N., & Noijons, J. (Eds.). (2009). Linking to the CEFR levels: Research perspectives. Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito/EALTA.

19 Fulcher, G. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data‐based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing, 13(2), 208–38.

20 Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–36.

21 Ginther, A. (2003). International teaching assistant testing: Policies and methods. In D. Douglas (Ed.), English language testing in U.S. colleges and universities (pp. 57–84). Washington, DC: NAFSA: Association of International Educators.

22 Ginther, A., Dimova, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379–99.

23 Ginther, A., & McIntosh, K. (2018). Language testing and assessment. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 845–67). New York, NY: Palgrave.

24 Harding, L. (2017). Validity in pronunciation assessment. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 30–48). Oxford, England: Routledge.

25 Hasselgreen, A. (2005). Testing the spoken English of young Norwegians: A study of test validity and the role of “smallwords” in contributing to pupils' fluency. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

26 He, A. W., & Young, R. (1998). Language proficiency interview: A discourse approach. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 1–26). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

27 Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2017). Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.

28 Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O'Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49.

29 Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 157–81.

30 Johnson, M., & Tyler, A. (1998). Re‐analyzing the OPI: How much does it look like natural conversation? In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 27–51). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

31 Kang, O., & Ginther, A. (Eds.). (2017). Assessment in second language pronunciation. Oxford, England: Routledge.

32 Koike, D. A. (1998). What happens when there's no one to talk to? Spanish foreign language in simulated oral proficiency interviews. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 69–101). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

33 Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London, England: Longman.

34 Lazaraton, A. (1992). The structural organization of a language interview: A conversation analytic perspective. System, 20(3), 373–86.

35 Lazaraton, A. (1997). Preference organization in oral proficiency interviews. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 53–72.

36 Lim, G. S. (2018). Conceptualizing and operationalizing second language speaking assessment: Updating the construct for a new century. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 215–18. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2018.1482493

37 Lumley, T., & McNamara, T. F. (1995). Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training. Language Testing, 12(1), 54–71.

38 Ockey, G. J., & French, R. (2016). From one to multiple accents on a test of L2 listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 693–715.

39 Ockey, G., Papageorgiou, S., & French, R. (2015). Effects of strength of accent on an L2 interactive lecture listening comprehension test. The International Journal of Listening, 30(1), 84–98.

40 O'Loughlin, K. (2001). The equivalence of direct and semi‐direct speaking tests. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

41 O'Sullivan, B. (2005). Introduction: The birth of modern testing. In B. O'Sullivan (Ed.), Language testing: Theories and practices (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Palgrave.

42 Plough, I., Banerjee, J., & Iwashita, N. (2018). Revisiting the speaking construct: The question of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 325–9.

43 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

44 Ross, J. R. (1979). Where's English? In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S. Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 127–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.

45 Ross, S., & Berwick, R. (1992). The discourse accommodation in oral proficiency interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(2), 159–76.

46 Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.

47 Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 133–58.

48 Shohamy, E. (1994). The validity of direct versus semi‐direct oral tests. Language Testing, 11(2), 99–123.

49 Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words: The development of objective language testing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

50 Stansfield, C. (1991). A comparative analysis of simulated and direct oral proficiency interviews. In S. Anivan (Ed.), Current developments in language testing (pp. 199–209). Singapore: RELC.

51 Stansfield, C., & Kenyon, D. (1992). Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview. System 20(3), 329–45.

52 Tannenbaum, R., & Wylie, E. C. (2008). Linking English‐language test scores onto the common European framework of reference: An application of standard‐setting methodology. Princeton, NJ: ETS.

53 Van Moere, A. (2006). Validity evidence in a university group oral test. Language Testing, 23(4), 411–40.

54 Van Moere, A. (2012). A psycholinguistic approach to oral language assessment. Language Testing, 29(3), 325–44.

55 Wind, S. A., & Peterson, M. E. (2018). A systematic review of methods for evaluating rating quality in language assessment. Language Testing, 35(2), 161–92.

56 Winke, P., Gass, S. M., & Myford, C. (2011). The relationship between raters' prior language study and the evaluation of foreign language speech samples. Princeton, NJ: ETS.

57 Xi, X., Higgins, D., Zechner, K., & Williamson, D. (2012). A comparison of two scoring methods for an automated speech scoring system. Language Testing, 29(3), 371–94.

58 Xi, X., & Mollaun, P. (2006). Investigating the utility of analytic scoring for the TOEFL academic speaking test (TAST). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

59 Yan, X. (2014). An examination of rater performance on a local oral English proficiency test: A mixed‐methods approach. Language Testing, 31(3), 501–27.

60 Yan, X., Cheng, L., & Ginther, A. (2019). Factor analysis for fairness: Examining the impact of task type and examinee L1 background on scores of an ITA speaking test. Language Testing, 36(2), 207–34. doi: 10.1177/0265532218775764

61 Yan, X., & Ginther, A. (2017). Listeners and raters: Similarities and differences in the evaluation of accented speech. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 67–88). Oxford, England: Routledge.

62 Yan, X., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Ginther, A. (2016). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta‐analysis. Language Testing, 33(4), 497–528.

63 Yan, X., Thirakunkovit, S., Kauper, N., & Ginther, A. (2016). What do test takers say: Test‐taker feedback as input for quality control. In J. Read (Ed.), Post‐admission language assessments of university students (pp. 113–36). Melbourne, Australia: Springer.