Читать книгу Nitric Oxide in Plants - Группа авторов - Страница 15
1.4.1 Crosstalk of Nitric Oxide with Other Phytohormones in Plants to Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance
ОглавлениеNO is involved in advanced signal mechanisms, as well as synergistic collaboration with phytohormones and alternative secondary signal molecules, to confer stress tolerance in plants. NO has been linked to a variety of phytohormones, including gibberellins, brassinosteroids, and ABA. The interaction of NO with phytohormones has been studied in a variety of ways. NO and plant hormones work together to regulate a wide range of physiological responses in plants. By activating Ca2+ and calcium‐dependent protein kinase via downstream signals, NO and auxin promote root development (Pagnussat et al. 2002). Similarly, the interaction of NO and auxin promotes Cd tolerance in the rosid dicot genus Truncatula by reducing auxin degradation (Xu et al. 2010). Furthermore, there is a growing of evidence pointing to the effect of NO in reducing serious metal toxicity (He et al. 2012; Yuan and Huang 2016; Wei et al. 2020). Iron deficiency, on the other hand, stimulates the assembly of auxin and increases NO levels, thereby upregulating ferric-chelate enzyme activity in Arabidopsis.
Various studies have emphasized the role of cytokinins in plant organic process processes, cellular division, and leaf senescence. Cytokinins and NO interact in a variety of ways, including synergistic and antagonistic responses. NO and cytokinins interact synergistically in response to drought stress causing leaf senescence, cellular division, and photosynthetic activity (Mishina et al. 2007; Shao et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2013). NO signaling via gibberellins induces multiple physiological responses in plants, including seed germination, root growth (Lozano-Juste and León 2011; Sanz et al. 2015), photosynthetic activity, and nutrient use potency. NO and gibberellins also have an antagonistic relationship because NO suppresses gibberellic acid signal events and signal transduction by promoting the accumulation of DELLA proteins (Asgher et al. 2017). Wu et al. (2014) discovered that gibberellins work antagonistically with NO to manage root growth in Arabidopsis at low and high P concentrations. Likewise, NO production is required for ABA-induced stomatal closure in guard cells (Neill et al. 2002). The role of NO–ABA interactions in drought stress and UV-B radiation stress has been well established in controlling stomatal closure and inhibitor defense machinery (Neill et al. 2008; Tossi et al. 2009).
Several studies have shown that ABA and NO interact in plant physiological responses and signaling mechanisms (Castillo et al. 2015; Asgher et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2020). Furthermore, NO and ethylene have an antagonistic interaction because NO inhibits ethylene synthesis and action by inhibiting leaf senescence and ripening (Leshem et al. 1998; Manjunatha et al. 2010). However, serious physiological responses to NO interactions with ethylene are being studied in Arabidopsis, Cucumis, and Nicotiana (Ederli et al. 2006). As a result, it is clear that the interaction of NO with phytohormones in abiotic stress tolerance is supported by a variety of evidence. Consider the interaction of NO with various hormones such as brassinosteroids, jasmonates, and polyamines (Liu et al. 2014; Lau et al. 2021; Nahar et al. 2016). The interaction of NO with hormones activates the advanced signal cascade, inducing a variety of responses to environmental stresses.
Despite the fact that there is conflicting evidence regarding the interference mechanism of NO with hormones, future research on the mechanisms of interaction of multiple hormones with NO and their potential pathways is required to be addressed in terms of stress responses and plant growth traits (Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 The physiological role of NO in plants under abiotic stress.
Plant species | Stressors | Physiological role | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Wheat | Drought | Enhanced drought tolerance | Garcia-Mata and Lamattina 2001 |
Alianthus altissima | Drought | Enhanced antioxidant defense mechanism, proline and osmolyte metabolism | Filippou et al. 2014 |
Wheat | Drought | Enhanced seedling growth, high relative water content, mitigation of oxidative stress | Tian and Lei 2006 |
Crambe abyssinica | Drought | Enhanced NR activity and suppressed ROS and malondialdehyde content | Batista et al. 2018 |
Arabidopsis | Drought | Early drought responsive processes along with translational and transcriptional reprogramming | Ederli et al. 2019 |
Bean | UV-B radiation | Decreased H2O2 content, enhanced leaf growth, elevated antioxidant enzyme activity | Shi et al. 2005 |
Alfalfa | Salinity | Enhanced plant growth and seed germination | Wang and Han 2007 |
Chickpea | Salinity | Stimulates plant development and antioxidant enzyme activity | Ahmad et al. 2016 |
Avicennia marina | Salinity | Enhanced photosynthetic activity | Shen et al. 2018 |
Zea mays | Salinity | Enhanced activity of tonoplast H+- ATPase and gene for Na+/H+ antiporter | Zhang et al. 2006 |
Cucumis sativus | Salinity | Spermidine accumulation has increased | Fan et al. 2013a |
Sunflower | Salinity | Seedling growth is improved, and antioxidant activity is increased and reduced ROS formation | Kaur and Bhatia 2016; Arora and Bhatia 2017 |
Jatropha | Salinity | Improved seedling growth with less oxidative stress and lower toxic ion deposition | Gadelha et al. 2017 |
Crocus sativus | Salinity | Increased growth due to osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activity, as well as increased secondary metabolite synthesis | Babaei et al. 2020 |
Pea | Salinity | Enhanced chlorophyll content, nutrient uptake, and antioxidant enzyme activity | Dadasoghi et al. 2020 |
Mustard | Salinity | Increased synthesis of antioxidant enzymes, enzymes for N metabolism, photosynthesis and respiration, decreased H2O2, MDA content, and PCD | Sami et al. 2021 |
Vigna radiata | Salinity | Increased activity of proline, total amino acids, reducing sugars, modulates antioxidant enzyme activities, physiological traits | Roychoudhary et al. 2021 |
Tomato | Salinity | Enhanced activities of NO and ROS | Liu et al. 2015a |
Spinach | Salinity | Enhanced secondary metabolites and activity of antioxidant enzymes | Du et al. 2015 |
Oryza sativa | As toxicity | Enhanced root growth and formation, reduced ROS generation, and As accumulation | Kushwaha et al. 2019 |
Arachis hypogea | Cd toxicity | Increased antioxidant enzyme activities, reduced ROS and Cd accumulation | Yuanjie et al. 2019 |
Arabidopsis | Cu toxicity | Improved cell viability | Peto et al. 2013 |
Tomato | Cd toxicity | Enhanced water uptake, reduced Cd uptake and oxidative damage | Ahmad et al. 2018 |
Cowpea, rye grass | Al toxicity | Enhanced chlorophyll content, antioxidant enzyme activities | Khairy et al. 2016; Sadeghipour 2016 |
Lablab purpureus L. | High temperature | Reduced lipid peroxidation and increased antioxidant activity, both enzymatic and nonenzymatic | Rai et al. 2018 |
Soybean | High temperature | Modulates activity of ascorbate peroxidase and peroxidase, reduced lipid peroxidation | Vital et al. 2019 |
Tomato | Low temperature | Enhanced germination, seedling root and shoot length, sugar content | Amooaghaie and Nikzad 2013 |
Juglans regia | Chilling stress | Enhanced chlorophyll, glutathione, and sugar content, reduced lipid peroxidation | Dong et al. 2018 |
Brassica | Herbicidal toxicity | Increase in NO content, low ROS formation, improved antioxidant activities | Hasanuzzman et al. 2018 |