Читать книгу Reframing Organizations - Lee G. Bolman - Страница 29

Notes

Оглавление

1. Among the possible ways of talking about frames are schemata or schema theory (Fiedler, 1982; Fiske and Dyer, 1985; Lord and Foti, 1986), representations (Frensch and Sternberg, 1991; Lesgold and Lajoie, 1991; Voss, Wolfe, Lawrence, and Engle, 1991), cognitive maps (Weick and Bougon, 1986), paradigms (Gregory, 1983; Kuhn, 1970), social categorizations (Cronshaw, 1987), implicit theories (Brief and Downey, 1983), mental models (Senge, 1990), definitions of the situation, and root metaphors.

2. J. R. Latham, [Re]Create the Organization You Really Want!: Leadership and Organization Design for Sustainable Excellence (Colorado Springs, CO: Organization Design Studio, Ltd., 2016).

3. Ken Blanchard and Colleen Barrett, Lead with LUV: A Different Way to Create Real Success (Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press, 2010), p. 7.

4. Jeffrey Pfeffer, Power: Why Some People Have It—and Others Don't (New York: Harper Business, 2010), p. 5.

5. Dave Logan, John King, and Halee Fischer‐Wright, Tribal Leadership: Leveraging Natural Groups to Build a Thriving Organization (New York: Harper, 2011), p. 4.

6. A number of scholars (including Allison, 1971; Bergquist, 1992; Birnbaum, 1988; Elmore, 1978; Morgan, 1986; Perrow, 1986; Quinn, 1988; Quinn, Faerman, Thompson, and McGrath, 1996; and Scott, 1981) have made similar arguments for multi‐frame approaches to groups and social collectives.

Reframing Organizations

Подняться наверх