Читать книгу DNA Origami - Группа авторов - Страница 61

1 1 Rothemund, P.W.K. (2006). Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440 (7082): 297–302.

2 2 Douglas, S.M., Dietz, H., Liedl, T. et al. (2009). Self‐assembly of DNA into nanoscale three‐dimensional shapes. Nature 459 (7245): 414–418.

3 3 Wagenbauer, K.F., Sigl, C., and Dietz, H. (2017). Gigadalton‐scale shape‐programmable DNA assemblies. Nature 552 (7683): 78–83.

4 4 Douglas, S.M., Marblestone, A.H., Teerapittayanon, S. et al. (2009). Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA‐origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Research 37 (15): 5001–5006.

5 5 Ke, Y., Douglas, S.M., Liu, M. et al. (2009). Multilayer DNA origami packed on a square lattice. Journal of the American Chemical Society 131 (43): 15903–15908.

6 6 Ke, Y., Voigt, N.V., Gothelf, K.V., and Shih, W.M. (2012). Multilayer DNA origami packed on hexagonal and hybrid lattices. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134 (3): 1770–1774.

7 7 Dietz, H., Douglas, S.M., and Shih, W.M. (2009). Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes. Science 325 (5941): 725–730.

8 8 Han, D., Pal, S., Nangreave, J. et al. (2011). DNA origami with complex curvatures in three‐dimensional space. Science 332 (6027): 342–346.

9 9 Schnitzbauer, J., Strauss, M.T., Schlichthaerle, T. et al. (2017). Super‐resolution microscopy with DNA‐PAINT. Nature Protocols 12 (6): 1198–1228.

10 10 Douglas, S.M., Bachelet, I., and Church, G.M. (2012). A logic‐gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335 (6070): 831–834.

11 11 Shaw, A., Lundin, V., Petrova, E. et al. (2014). Spatial control of membrane receptor function using ligand nanocalipers. Nature Methods 11 (8): 841–846.

12 12 Kuzyk, A., Schreiber, R., Fan, Z. et al. (2012). DNA‐based self‐assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response. Nature 483 (7389): 311–314.

13 13 Gopinath, A., Miyazono, E., Faraon, A., and Rothemund, P.W.K. (2016). Engineering and mapping nanocavity emission via precision placement of DNA origami. Nature 535 (7612): 401–405.

14 14 Bathe, M. and Rothemund, P.W.K. (2017). DNA nanotechnology: a foundation for programmable nanoscale materials. MRS Bulletin 42 (12): 882–888.

15 15 Xiong, Y., Yang, S., Tian, Y. et al. (2020). Three‐dimensional patterning of nanoparticles by molecular stamping. ACS Nano 14 (6): 6823–6833.

16 16 Helmi, S., Ziegler, C., Kauert, D.J., and Seidel, R. (2014). Shape‐controlled synthesis of gold nanostructures using DNA origami molds. Nano Letters 14 (11): 6693–6698.

17 17 Castro, C.E., Kilchherr, F., Kim, D.‐N. et al. (2011). A primer to scaffolded DNA origami. Nature Methods 8 (3): 221–229.

18 18 Šulc, P., Romano, F., Ouldridge, T.E. et al. (2012). Sequence‐dependent thermodynamics of a coarse‐grained DNA model. The Journal of Chemical Physics 137 (13): 135101.

19 19 Snodin, B.E.K., Randisi, F., Mosayebi, M. et al. (2015). Introducing improved structural properties and salt dependence into a coarse‐grained model of DNA. The Journal of Chemical Physics 142 (23): 234901.

20 20 Snodin, B.E.K., Schreck, J.S., Romano, F. et al. (2019). Coarse‐grained modelling of the structural properties of DNA origami. Nucleic Acids Research 47 (3): 1585–1597.

21 21 Maffeo, C. and Aksimentiev, A. (2020). MrDNA: a multi‐resolution model for predicting the structure and dynamics of DNA systems. Nucleic Acids Research 48 (9): 5135–5146.

22 22 Anastassacos, F.M., Zhao, Z., Zeng, Y., and Shih, W.M. (2020). Glutaraldehyde cross‐linking of oligolysines coating DNA origami greatly reduces susceptibility to nuclease degradation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (7): 3311–3315.

23 23 Gerling T, Kube M, Kick B, Dietz H (2018). Sequence‐programmable covalent bonding of designed DNA assemblies. Science Advances 4(8):eaau1157.

24 24 Gerling, T. and Dietz, H. (2019). Reversible covalent stabilization of stacking contacts in DNA assemblies. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58 (9): 2680–2684.

25 25 Fuller, R.B. (1982). Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking. Macmillan Pub Co 916.

26 26 Eyckmans, J., Boudou, T., Yu, X., and Chen, C.S. (2011). A hitchhiker’s guide to mechanobiology. Dev Cell 21 (1): 35–47.

27 27 Jansen KA, Donato DM, Balcioglu HE, Schmidt T, Danen EHJ, Koenderink GH (2015). A guide to mechanobiology: where biology and physics meet. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) ‐ Molecular Cell Research. 1853(11, Part B):3043–3052.

28 28 Ariga, K., Minami, K., Ebara, M., and Nakanishi, J. (2016). What are the emerging concepts and challenges in NANO? Nanoarchitectonics, hand‐operating nanotechnology and mechanobiology. Polymer Journal 48 (4): 371–389.

29 29 Wang, J.H.‐C. and Thampatty, B.P. (2006). An introductory review of cell mechanobiology. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 5 (1): 1–16.

30 30 Plotnikov, S.V., Pasapera, A.M., Sabass, B., and Waterman, C.M. (2012). Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM‐rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151 (7): 1513–1527.

31 31 Elosegui‐Artola, A., Bazellières, E., Allen, M.D. et al. (2014). Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types. Nature Materials 13 (6): 631–637.

32 32 Lewis AH, Grandl J (2015). Mechanical sensitivity of Piezo1 ion channels can be tuned by cellular membrane tension. eLife. 4:e12088.

33 33 Dupont, S., Morsut, L., Aragona, M. et al. (2011). Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474 (7350): 179–183.

34 34 Funke JJ, Ketterer P, Lieleg C, Schunter S, Korber P, Dietz H (2016). Uncovering the forces between nucleosomes using DNA origami. Science Advances 2(11):e1600974.

35 35 Kilchherr, F., Wachauf, C., Pelz, B. et al. (2016). Single‐molecule dissection of stacking forces in DNA. Science 353 (6304).

36 36 Nickels, P.C., Wünsch, B., Holzmeister, P. et al. (2016). Molecular force spectroscopy with a DNA origami–based nanoscopic force clamp. Science 354 (6310): 305–307.

37 37 Kramm, K., Schröder, T., Gouge, J. et al. (2020). DNA origami‐based single‐molecule force spectroscopy elucidates RNA Polymerase III pre‐initiation complex stability. Nature Communications 11 (1): 2828.

38 38 Mishra, S., Feng, Y., Endo, M., and Sugiyama, H. (2020). Advances in DNA origami–cell interfaces. ChemBioChem 21 (1–2): 33–44.

39 39 Chen, J. and Seeman, N.C. (1991). Synthesis from DNA of a molecule with the connectivity of a cube. Nature 350 (6319): 631–633.

40 40 Shih, W.M., Quispe, J.D., and Joyce, G.F. (2004). A 1.7‐kilobase single‐stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron. Nature 427 (6975): 618–621.

41 41 Han, D., Qi, X., Myhrvold, C. et al. (2017). Single‐stranded DNA and RNA origami. Science 358 (6369): eaao2648.

42 42 Geary, C., Rothemund, P.W.K., and Andersen, E.S. (2014). A single‐stranded architecture for cotranscriptional folding of RNA nanostructures. Science 345 (6198): 799–804.

43 43 He, Y., Ye, T., Su, M. et al. (2008). Hierarchical self‐assembly of DNA into symmetric supramolecular polyhedra. Nature 452 (7184): 198–201.

44 44 He, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, H. et al. (2005). Self‐assembly of hexagonal DNA two‐dimensional (2D) arrays. Journal of the American Chemical Society 127 (35): 12202–12203.

45 45 Rothemund PWK. Scaffolded DNA (2006) origami: from generalized multicrossovers to polygonal networks. In: Chen J, Jonoska N, Rozenberg G, editors. Nanotechnology: Science and Computation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 3–21. (Natural Computing Series).

46 46 Yan, H., Park, S.H., Finkelstein, G. et al. (2003). DNA‐templated self‐assembly of protein arrays and highly conductive nanowires. Science 301 (5641): 1882–1884.

47 47 Veneziano, R., Ratanalert, S., Zhang, K. et al. (2016). Designer nanoscale DNA assemblies programmed from the top down. Science 352 (6293): 1534–1534.

48 48 Wang, W., Chen, S., An, B. et al. (2019). Complex wireframe DNA nanostructures from simple building blocks. Nature Communications 10 (1): 1–8.

49 49 Iinuma, R., Ke, Y., Jungmann, R. et al. (2014). Polyhedra self‐assembled from DNA tripods and characterized with 3D DNA‐PAINT. Science 344 (6179): 65–69.

50 50 Gerling, T., Wagenbauer, K.F., Neuner, A.M., and Dietz, H. (2015). Dynamic DNA devices and assemblies formed by shape‐complementary, non–base pairing 3D components. Science 347 (6229): 1446–1452.

51 51 Smith, D.M., Schüller, V., Forthmann, C. et al. (2011). A structurally variable hinged tetrahedron framework from DNA origami. Journal of Nucleic Acids 2011: e360954.

52 52 Han, D., Pal, S., Yang, Y. et al. (2013). DNA gridiron nanostructures based on four‐arm junctions. Science 339 (6126): 1412–1415.

53 53 Zhang, F., Jiang, S., Wu, S. et al. (2015). Complex wireframe DNA origami nanostructures with multi‐arm junction vertices. Nature Nanotechnology 10 (9): 779–784.

54 54 Hong, F., Jiang, S., Wang, T. et al. (2016). 3D framework DNA origami with layered crossovers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (41): 12832–12835.

55 55 Benson, E., Mohammed, A., Gardell, J. et al. (2015). DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale. Nature 523 (7561): 441–444.

56 56 Benson, E., Mohammed, A., Bosco, A. et al. (2016). Computer‐aided production of scaffolded DNA nanostructures from flat sheet meshes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (31): 8869–8872.

57 57 Benson, E., Mohammed, A., Rayneau‐Kirkhope, D. et al. (2018). Effects of design choices on the stiffness of wireframe DNA origami structures. ACS Nano 12 (9): 9291–9299.

58 58 Benson, E., Lolaico, M., Tarasov, Y. et al. (2019). Evolutionary refinement of DNA nanostructures using coarse‐grained molecular dynamics simulations. ACS Nano 13 (11): 12591–12598.

59 59 Jun H, Zhang F, Shepherd T, Ratanalert S, Qi X, Yan H, et al. (2019) Autonomously designed free‐form 2D DNA origami. Science Advances 5(1):eaav0655.

60 60 Jun, H., Shepherd, T.R., Zhang, K. et al. (2019). Automated sequence design of 3D polyhedral wireframe DNA origami with honeycomb edges. ACS Nano 13 (2): 2083–2093.

61 61 Jun, H., Wang, X., Bricker, W.P., and Bathe, M. (2019). Automated sequence design of 2D wireframe DNA origami with honeycomb edges. Nature Communications 10 (1): 1–9.

62 62 Jun H, Wang X, Bricker WP, Jackson S, Bathe M (2020). Rapid prototyping of wireframe scaffolded DNA origami using ATHENA. bioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.09.940320.

63 63 Vogel, V. and Sheetz, M. (2006). Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7 (4): 265–275.

64 64 Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H., and Sheetz, M.P. (2014). Appreciating force and shape — the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 15 (12): 825–833.

65 65 Gordon, W.R., Zimmerman, B., He, L. et al. (2015). Mechanical allostery: evidence for a force requirement in the proteolytic activation of Notch. Developmental Cell 33 (6): 729–736.

66 66 Luca, V.C., Kim, B.C., Ge, C. et al. (2017). Notch‐Jagged complex structure implicates a catch bond in tuning ligand sensitivity. Science 355 (6331): 1320–1324.

67 67 Simmel, S.S., Nickels, P.C., and Liedl, T. (2014). Wireframe and tensegrity DNA nanostructures. Accounts of Chemical Research 47 (6): 1691–1699.

68 68 Liedl, T., Högberg, B., Tytell, J. et al. (2010). Self‐assembly of three‐dimensional prestressed tensegrity structures from DNA. Nature Nanotechnology 5 (7): 520–524.

69 69 DeLuca, M., Shi, Z., Castro, C.E., and Arya, G. (2020). Dynamic DNA nanotechnology: toward functional nanoscale devices. Nanoscale Horizons 5 (2): 182–201.

70 70 Smith, S.B., Cui, Y., and Bustamante, C. (1996). Overstretching B‐DNA: the elastic response of individual double‐stranded and single‐stranded DNA molecules. Science 271 (5250): 795–799.

71 71 Suma, A., Poppleton, E., Matthies, M. et al. (2019). TacoxDNA: a user‐friendly web server for simulations of complex DNA structures, from single strands to origami. Journal of Computational Chemistry 40 (29): 2586–2595.

72 72 Poppleton, E., Bohlin, J., Matthies, M. et al. (2020). Design, optimization and analysis of large DNA and RNA nanostructures through interactive visualization, editing and molecular simulation. Nucleic Acids Research.